I'm thinking Norwood holds claim to the only convincing win over Marquez,and that was a all around nasty,messy & close fight for both.Oh and his early DQ loss of course,but I'm sure he was only retaliating![]()
In threads like these there are always plenty of people saying otherwise.
Just because the judges score a fight a certain way doesn't mean that the result is justified or fair, though in this case I believe it is. Boxing is one of those rare sports where the outcome can depend upon perception and as such it's always interesting to discuss how we as boxing fans perceived the fight. The official scores are on the record, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't discuss who we thought won.
Last edited by miron_lang; 06-03-2009 at 04:08 AM.
I'm sounding like a broken record but oh well:
The first fight PAC definitely should've won if not for judge Clemens
The second fight could've gone either way but PAC definitely landed the harder quality shots that shook the other guy more.
[SIGPIC]
Hidden Content
well, you said it. i know a lot here got hit on the noggins. lol
the thing is it is a close fight and anyone who say for certain that one fighter won over the other is what you say they are. record books though would have the fight a draw and a win for pacquiao which will what history would look at since there really isn't any outcry for robbery.
Last edited by KKisser; 06-03-2009 at 03:00 AM.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks