Slow ticket sales for Mayweather-JMM fight

[ElTerribleMorales]

I won a bet here against Mr. LeftyLee for the PAC-Hatton fight, now tell us when was the last time you won a bet here and with whom?? Or did you ever made a bet here??

Then tell me who's coward for not accepting a bet on non-existent fight...
.

yet you were too much of a chicken shit to make a sig bet for the Lopez/Penalosa fight if that's not being a coward, don't know what is

perhaps, people don't want to see a boring fight. both fighters are known to be runners inside the ring, waiting for their opponent to make mistake before going for a strike

umm Marquez a runner?!? what fights are you fucking watching? counter puncher, yes, a runner, hell no

everytime i see the little Fillipino flag and New Member under it, and then posting mainly in threads that will in some way be linked to Manny and i find it very hard to take their opinions seriously, especially since most sound like Saddoboxer, and well it's a known FACT and not an OPINION that he's a clueless moron

yes you're right, I DID own you

I won a bet here against Mr. LeftyLee for the PAC-Hatton fight, now tell us when was the last time you won a bet here and with whom?? Or did you ever made a bet here??

Then tell me who's coward for not accepting a bet on non-existent fight...
.

yet you were too much of a chicken shit to make a sig bet for the Lopez/Penalosa fight if that's not being a coward, don't know what is

perhaps, people don't want to see a boring fight. both fighters are known to be runners inside the ring, waiting for their opponent to make mistake before going for a strike

umm Marquez a runner?!? what fights are you fucking watching? counter puncher, yes, a runner, hell no

everytime i see the little Fillipino flag and New Member under it, and then posting mainly in threads that will in some way be linked to Manny and i find it very hard to take their opinions seriously, especially since most sound like Saddoboxer, and well it's a known FACT and not an OPINION that he's a clueless moron

A "clueless moron" owned you in discussions/debates then what does it makes out of yourself?? A dumb moron?? ...
.

when have you ever "owned" anyone on here LMAO, when people get tired of hearing your daily borderline gay comments on Pacquiao, and stop bothering with your bullshit, doesn't mean you own shit, well you're the Fillipino Danny G , sad thing is that Danny wasn't AS transparent as you, and well he at least would play off his queer admiration by making another account hahaha, FACT IS Quinito stepped up to do what you never had the balls to, and that's back it up, you're a sad sad little girl

[XaduBoxer]

yet you were too much of a chicken shit to make a sig bet for the Lopez/Penalosa fight if that's not being a coward, don't know what is

umm Marquez a runner?!? what fights are you fucking watching? counter puncher, yes, a runner, hell no

everytime i see the little Fillipino flag and New Member under it, and then posting mainly in threads that will in some way be linked to Manny and i find it very hard to take their opinions seriously, especially since most sound like Saddoboxer, and well it's a known FACT and not an OPINION that he's a clueless moron

yes you're right, I DID own you

yet you were too much of a chicken shit to make a sig bet for the Lopez/Penalosa fight if that's not being a coward, don't know what is

umm Marquez a runner?!? what fights are you fucking watching? counter puncher, yes, a runner, hell no

everytime i see the little Fillipino flag and New Member under it, and then posting mainly in threads that will in some way be linked to Manny and i find it very hard to take their opinions seriously, especially since most sound like Saddoboxer, and well it's a known FACT and not an OPINION that he's a clueless moron

A "clueless moron" owned you in discussions/debates then what does it makes out of yourself?? A dumb moron?? ...
.

when have you ever "owned" anyone on here LMAO, when people get tired of hearing your daily borderline gay comments on Pacquiao, and stop bothering with your bullshit, doesn't mean you own shit, well you're the Fillipino Danny G , sad thing is that Danny wasn't AS transparent as you, and well he at least would play off his queer admiration by making another account hahaha, FACT IS Quinito stepped up to do what you never had the balls to, and that's back it up, you're a sad sad little girl

Did you remember you was OWNED here (by me ) when you claimed JMM hold a lineal title at 126??

To help you remember it, here's the link --> http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...00-post15.html

[ElTerribleMorales]

yes you're right, I DID own you

A "clueless moron" owned you in discussions/debates then what does it makes out of yourself?? A dumb moron?? ...
.

when have you ever "owned" anyone on here LMAO, when people get tired of hearing your daily borderline gay comments on Pacquiao, and stop bothering with your bullshit, doesn't mean you own shit, well you're the Fillipino Danny G , sad thing is that Danny wasn't AS transparent as you, and well he at least would play off his queer admiration by making another account hahaha, FACT IS Quinito stepped up to do what you never had the balls to, and that's back it up, you're a sad sad little girl

Did you remember you was OWNED here (by me ) when you claimed JMM hold a lineal title at 126??

To help you remember it, here's the link --> http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...00-post15.html

umm no, all you did was try to deny the fact that Marquez was considered the man at 126 after Pacquiao only managed to score a draw and ran up to 130, and looked up and Pacquiao has only held 3 lineal titles/Ring titles, FACT

[XaduBoxer]

yes you're right, I DID own you


when have you ever "owned" anyone on here LMAO, when people get tired of hearing your daily borderline gay comments on Pacquiao, and stop bothering with your bullshit, doesn't mean you own shit, well you're the Fillipino Danny G , sad thing is that Danny wasn't AS transparent as you, and well he at least would play off his queer admiration by making another account hahaha, FACT IS Quinito stepped up to do what you never had the balls to, and that's back it up, you're a sad sad little girl

Did you remember you was OWNED here (by me ) when you claimed JMM hold a lineal title at 126??

To help you remember it, here's the link --> http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...00-post15.html

umm no, all you did was try to deny the fact that Marquez was considered the man at 126 after Pacquiao only managed to score a draw and ran up to 130, and looked up and Pacquiao has only held 3 lineal titles/Ring titles, FACT

When you claimed that a certain boxer holds a lineal title, sane persons would have based it from the history record books... It's insane and senseless to claim boxer so and so is a lineal champ according to your own opinion only... It doesn't work that way and if you pursue it, you would just become a laughing stock in discussion forums since that way everybody can just claim that boxer so and so has 5, 6, 7 lineal titles... We have record books for that purpose...

When PAC and JMM met the first time, PAC was the 126 lineal champ and JMM the IBF/WBA 126 champ... The fight was scored officially a draw and each boxer kept their titles... PAC moved up to 130 after that and the lineal title was declared vacant up to now... It will only be filled up again if the #1 guy at 126 will fight the #2 or #3 guy for the lineal championship...

It's a fact, JMM was not recognized to hold a lineal title at 126 (featherweight division)...
.

[ElTerribleMorales]

Did you remember you was OWNED here (by me ) when you claimed JMM hold a lineal title at 126??

To help you remember it, here's the link --> http://www.saddoboxing.com/boxingfor...00-post15.html

umm no, all you did was try to deny the fact that Marquez was considered the man at 126 after Pacquiao only managed to score a draw and ran up to 130, and looked up and Pacquiao has only held 3 lineal titles/Ring titles, FACT

When you claimed that a certain boxer holds a lineal title, sane persons would have based it from the history record books... It's insane and senseless to claim boxer so and so is a lineal champ according to your own opinion only... It doesn't work that way and if you pursue it, you would just become a laughing stock in discussion forums since that way everybody can just claim that boxer so and so has 5, 6, 7 lineal titles... We have record books for that purpose...

When PAC and JMM met the first time, PAC was the 126 lineal champ and JMM the IBF/WBA 126 champ... The fight was scored officially a draw and each boxer kept their titles... PAC moved up to 130 after that and the lineal title was declared vacant up to now... It will only be filled up again if the #1 guy at 126 will fight the #2 or #3 guy for the lineal championship...

It's a fact, JMM was not recognized to hold a lineal title at 126 (featherweight division)...
.

and if you wanna go by the it's FACT that Pacquiao's only held 3 lineal/Ring championships, not 4 like you've claimed, Ring Magazine recognized Marquez as the top fighter at 126 before his controversial loss to John, and no one's a bigger laughing stock on here than you, so no worries here

[XaduBoxer]

umm no, all you did was try to deny the fact that Marquez was considered the man at 126 after Pacquiao only managed to score a draw and ran up to 130, and looked up and Pacquiao has only held 3 lineal titles/Ring titles, FACT

When you claimed that a certain boxer holds a lineal title, sane persons would have based it from the history record books... It's insane and senseless to claim boxer so and so is a lineal champ according to your own opinion only... It doesn't work that way and if you pursue it, you would just become a laughing stock in discussion forums since that way everybody can just claim that boxer so and so has 5, 6, 7 lineal titles... We have record books for that purpose...

When PAC and JMM met the first time, PAC was the 126 lineal champ and JMM the IBF/WBA 126 champ... The fight was scored officially a draw and each boxer kept their titles... PAC moved up to 130 after that and the lineal title was declared vacant up to now... It will only be filled up again if the #1 guy at 126 will fight the #2 or #3 guy for the lineal championship...

It's a fact, JMM was not recognized to hold a lineal title at 126 (featherweight division)...
.

and if you wanna go by the it's FACT that Pacquiao's only held 3 lineal/Ring championships, not 4 like you've claimed, Ring Magazine recognized Marquez as the top fighter at 126 before his controversial loss to John, and no one's a bigger laughing stock on here than you, so no worries here

I asked when was JMM considered a lineal/ring champ at 126... Currently that title is vacant and the last lineal/ring champ at 126 is Manny Pacquiao... You can't changed fact from record books with your own personal opinion... It's so bad and insane Mr. Erik... Please stop that...
.

[ElTerribleMorales]

When you claimed that a certain boxer holds a lineal title, sane persons would have based it from the history record books... It's insane and senseless to claim boxer so and so is a lineal champ according to your own opinion only... It doesn't work that way and if you pursue it, you would just become a laughing stock in discussion forums since that way everybody can just claim that boxer so and so has 5, 6, 7 lineal titles... We have record books for that purpose...

When PAC and JMM met the first time, PAC was the 126 lineal champ and JMM the IBF/WBA 126 champ... The fight was scored officially a draw and each boxer kept their titles... PAC moved up to 130 after that and the lineal title was declared vacant up to now... It will only be filled up again if the #1 guy at 126 will fight the #2 or #3 guy for the lineal championship...

It's a fact, JMM was not recognized to hold a lineal title at 126 (featherweight division)...
.

and if you wanna go by the it's FACT that Pacquiao's only held 3 lineal/Ring championships, not 4 like you've claimed, Ring Magazine recognized Marquez as the top fighter at 126 before his controversial loss to John, and no one's a bigger laughing stock on here than you, so no worries here

I asked when was JMM considered a lineal/ring champ at 126... Currently that title is vacant and the last lineal/ring champ at 126 is Manny Pacquiao... You can't changed fact from record books with your own personal opinion... It's so bad and insane Mr. Erik... Please stop that...
.

dude is smoking crack, and you're talking to me about changing facts? (which i haven't), who was it that claimed on numerous occasions that Manny has held 4 lineal/Ring titles? oh yea that was you, the biggest joke on the forum

[rialex]

umm no, all you did was try to deny the fact that Marquez was considered the man at 126 after Pacquiao only managed to score a draw and ran up to 130, and looked up and Pacquiao has only held 3 lineal titles/Ring titles, FACT

When you claimed that a certain boxer holds a lineal title, sane persons would have based it from the history record books... It's insane and senseless to claim boxer so and so is a lineal champ according to your own opinion only... It doesn't work that way and if you pursue it, you would just become a laughing stock in discussion forums since that way everybody can just claim that boxer so and so has 5, 6, 7 lineal titles... We have record books for that purpose...

When PAC and JMM met the first time, PAC was the 126 lineal champ and JMM the IBF/WBA 126 champ... The fight was scored officially a draw and each boxer kept their titles... PAC moved up to 130 after that and the lineal title was declared vacant up to now... It will only be filled up again if the #1 guy at 126 will fight the #2 or #3 guy for the lineal championship...

It's a fact, JMM was not recognized to hold a lineal title at 126 (featherweight division)...
.

and if you wanna go by the it's FACT that Pacquiao's only held 3 lineal/Ring championships, not 4 like you've claimed, Ring Magazine recognized Marquez as the top fighter at 126 before his controversial loss to John, and no one's a bigger laughing stock on here than you, so no worries here