Quote Originally Posted by AdamGB View Post
So what?

David Haye isn't a light Heavy Weight or a Cruiserweight from the past 50 years... David Haye is David Haye.

How many Eastern Europian fighters were ruling the division 50 years ago Lyle?

Doesn't matter though does it, because both questions are irelevant to the fact that Haye secured the fight and that is that... we are not talking about how well he will do based on the law of averages... we are talking about the fact he didn't fight his way to the belt. if he'd had to fight his way to it I'm sure he would have set about that instead. But he didn't have to.

Can't see were the dicussion can go from there.
Up until the 1990's the Eastern Europeans were in something called Communism and therefore only allowed to box amateur....so that's a moot point.

If you want to see Haye get his ass whupped then fine, I just find it amusing that the same people that said "Wlad isn't ready" are the exact same people that are saying "David Haye deserves a title shot"...such a double standard.

It doesn't matter how weak you percieve the division to be David Haye isn't ready AND if you were a true FAN you would be worried and rightfully so. With David Haye's style 1 big beat down at heavyweight could ruin him forever.....but I guess he's ready for it, I mean he already has achieved sooooo much fighting the likes of an Old Jean Marc Mormeck, Tomaz Bonin, and Monte Barrett.....oh wait, I left out Enzo Maccarinelli! Man Enzo has been on a hot streak lately huh? He certainly turned out to be an awesome force in the cruiserweight division