Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 88

Thread: What do you think of Catch weights?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    968
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    If PAC and Cotto will agree to fight at a catchweight of 143, do you think there could be some group who can successfully protest that this fight should not happen at that catchweight??
    No people will just accept it like all the other crap in Boxing (like the WBA).
    You're absolutely right, people will accept the fight... happy that the fight was made... buy tickets... buy PPVs... and enjoy the fight...

    So what's the fuzz all about??
    .
    The fuzz is that an opponent is weakened. People have given Manny a lot of respect and attention for beating bigger guys like Oscar and Hatton, he can do it again or at least has a good shot of doing it again. In my opinion Manny has Superior boxing skills, hand speed, foot movement compared to Cotto, isn't that enough of an advantage? If he shows up and fights Cotto with a good game plan and great boxing skills like he did against Oscar his chances are very good against Cotto.

    Manny fought Oscar at the 147 limit, why not Cotto?

  2. #2
    XaduBoxer Guest

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by bzkfn View Post

    No people will just accept it like all the other crap in Boxing (like the WBA).
    You're absolutely right, people will accept the fight... happy that the fight was made... buy tickets... buy PPVs... and enjoy the fight...

    So what's the fuzz all about??
    .
    The fuzz is that an opponent is weakened. People have given Manny a lot of respect and attention for beating bigger guys like Oscar and Hatton, he can do it again or at least has a good shot of doing it again. In my opinion Manny has Superior boxing skills, hand speed, foot movement compared to Cotto, isn't that enough of an advantage? If he shows up and fights Cotto with a good game plan and great boxing skills like he did against Oscar his chances are very good against Cotto.

    Manny fought Oscar at the 147 limit, why not Cotto?

    Because Hoya is a 154 boxer and PAC a 135 boxer so they met in the middle of 147...

    Cotto a 147 boxer and PAC a 140 boxer now so they will meet in the middle which is 143/144...
    .

  3. #3
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    968
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by XaduBoxer View Post

    You're absolutely right, people will accept the fight... happy that the fight was made... buy tickets... buy PPVs... and enjoy the fight...

    So what's the fuzz all about??
    .
    The fuzz is that an opponent is weakened. People have given Manny a lot of respect and attention for beating bigger guys like Oscar and Hatton, he can do it again or at least has a good shot of doing it again. In my opinion Manny has Superior boxing skills, hand speed, foot movement compared to Cotto, isn't that enough of an advantage? If he shows up and fights Cotto with a good game plan and great boxing skills like he did against Oscar his chances are very good against Cotto.

    Manny fought Oscar at the 147 limit, why not Cotto?

    Because Hoya is a 154 boxer and PAC a 135 boxer so they met in the middle of 147...

    Cotto a 147 boxer and PAC a 140 boxer now so they will meet in the middle which is 143/144...
    .
    Oh I get it now.
    Pacman fans seems to think anytime a guy moves up in weight to fight for a title it has to be at a catch weight right? lol
    That's not how it's done son. It's rarely done in boxing. When a guy moves up in weigth and wants to challenge another guys titles both are usually in good tip top condition to square off. That's just a pussy move popularize by Delahoya and Ray Leonard.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    City Of Angels
    Posts
    413
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    It is more about money than belts these days. But I wish the fight would happen at 147 to STFU all pac-haters. I think its still winnable for Pac. Its 50/50 there imo.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Quote Originally Posted by Quinito View Post
    It is more about money than belts these days. But I wish the fight would happen at 147 to STFU all pac-haters. I think its still winnable for Pac. Its 50/50 there imo.
    I don't hate Pacquiao at all. Love watching him fight and I respect his talent. But you die hard Pac fans just can't seem to see through the bullshit. My problem with the catchweight is that somebody being weight drained is seriously hindering them in a fight. Pacquiao has shown he is strong and healthy at Welterweight. So why the catchweight? Take the risk, and he'll get more respect from the fans. If not, stay at 140 and fight Valero, and then give Marquez the 3rd fight he's owed.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1710
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    One of the main issues is that it's easier to put a few pounds on than take them off. That's why I didn't really have a problem with the JMM/PBF fight because it was one guy coming up 8lbs, the other guy coming down 4lbs, which seemed fairer. However, Pac has shown he can fight at a 147 limit, so he SHOULD fight there, it's not like he's coming up from 135, he's THE man at 140 & if that's his limit than he should stay there, not drain natural welters.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    10,364
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1398
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Were talking about 3lbs of weight.

    THREE FUKIN POUNDS MAN...

    I mean, we didn't have to witness the likes of Chris Byrd insisting that Wlad Klitschko loose 3,4,5,10, 11lbs, a stone in weight just to make a fukin fight.

    Or Evander Holyfield tellin Lewis ''You'll you'll get ya shot as soon as you shift 10lbs in weight because OMG your so much heavier than me''!!



    Catch Weights are undeniably Gay.

    There are enough lower-weight class-divisions to make ANY transistion (south of Light-Heavyweight) a ''fair'' one.
    Last edited by Jimanuel Boogustus; 06-16-2009 at 12:08 PM.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Birmingham, UK
    Posts
    6,156
    Mentioned
    15 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1416
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: What do you think of Catch weights?

    Lets also point out that 2 of Pacquiao's losses are attributed to difficulty making weight. Are you saying that the likes of Rustico Torrecampo and Medgoen Singsurat have proven their all time greatness by beating the man now considered the best fighter in the world?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. When will the war catch up with Cotto?
    By littlebif in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 06-15-2009, 11:24 PM
  2. Catch Me Up
    By amat in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 03-17-2009, 06:22 PM
  3. is this not the greatest catch ever seen?
    By TheChosenOne in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 10-20-2008, 02:30 AM
  4. Anyone catch the Berto fight?
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 37
    Last Post: 06-24-2008, 07:32 PM
  5. anyone else catch the beef
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 06-06-2006, 01:40 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing