 |
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Boxing: Entertainment or Sport?
In boxing the best fight the best when the money is best.
So i'd go with boxing is a buisness.
Every other major sport, even without money being on the line, the top guys would still do it - Tiger Woods would play golf, Nadal would play Tennis, top footballers would still play football etc
What boxers would fight without money being the no.1 incentive?
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Boxing: Entertainment or Sport?
The mad and the mad rich ones!Originally Posted by Fenster
What boxers would fight without money being the no.1 incentive?
"Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."
George Foreman
Cunt of a Mod. Fact.
Array
Re: Boxing: Entertainment or Sport?
Yes.. although even the mad rich ones wouldn't continue for anything less than mad riches.The mad and the mad rich ones!What boxers would fight without money being the no.1 incentive?
By the way - Pac at middleweight is a bit of a stretch. Although Pac-Pavlik? I got Pac.
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Manos De Piedra
Array
Re: Boxing: Entertainment or Sport?
its both
Forum Contender
Array
Re: Boxing: Entertainment or Sport?
It is both.
Some of it I love, some of it I don't love.
I don't love bullshit. The kind of prizefighting stuff that goes on a lot these days.
For example, boxers get easy fights, get hyped up beyond belief and will fight some 38 year old legend who is way passed their best and carry on like they are the greatest boxer of all time.
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: Boxing: Entertainment or Sport?
Me too!
By the way - Pac at middleweight is a bit of a stretch. Although Pac-Pavlik? I got Pac.
"Boxing is like jazz. The better it is, the less people appreciate it."
George Foreman
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks