Well which part of that last post was biased?
Well which part of that last post was biased?
1..The part where you expect a fighter new in a division to be taking on Dangerous fighters instead of easing himself in
2..Then the part where you dismiss the fact he was Undisputed Cruiserweight Champion as having achieved nothing
There is nothing wrong in not rating a fighter or believing the division he fights in is'nt that good..and then putting a reasoned argument to why you believe that point of view...but to expect him to live up to his claims on the back of one fight and one Pull out because of injury without really giving any valid reason....I GOTTA SAY SEEMS CUT AND DRIED BIAS TO ME![]()
#1 David Haye wants to fight the Klitschko's in his 3rd heavyweight fight after fighting the likes of Tomaz Bonin and Monte Barrett so either David Haye is ready to fight the top level guys or he isn't. I would have had 0 issue had Haye fought a Sam Peter or hell even Oleg Maskaev or Andrew Golota someone who actually used to fight at the top level and THEN called out Wlad but he fought 2 bums and called out Wlad, that doesn't add up to me. Even if you look at Floyd Mayweather Jr. taking a tune up fight to get ready at 140, he fought Demarcus Corley a guy who actually did something at 140.
#2 Which of those guys as cruiserweight that David Haye beat would do anything at heavyweightI think Haye has talent and everything but history has shown us that cruiserweights don't usually do all that great in the heavyweight division.
I can't but disagree..I like Haye and think he has great potential in the division and has gone about it the right way..although I can agree his mouth does himself no favours and causes enough debate to cover most forums between the fans who follow him and the fans who despise him!
Sometimes I think just shut up myself TBH.![]()
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks