Re: Am i the only one who thinks Pacquiao should be fighting Mosley??

Originally Posted by
Majesty
For everyone saying Cotto is the weaker opponent and everything.
Put Mosley in there with a young gun like Clottey and not someone who telegraphs everything he throws and see how much better he looks against Clottey then Cotto. It's sort of amazing how he blitzes Margarito who is someone tailor made for him to look spectacular against and people forget the trouble he had with Mayorga. Clottey is a different kind of beast at this stage then Margarito . If you put Clottey in with Shane you'd probably see Shane have a lot of trouble too and then you'd be flip flopping who was the weakest.
I personally think that anyone that is behind a Cotto vs Pacquiao fight or a Mosley vs Pacquiao fight can't hate on Mayweather for fighting Marquez.
Shane fought Margarito then same way he fought collazo he stood toe to toe and was willing to trade. I fail to see the logic in saying that mosley would look bad against clottey just because cotto looked bad. And now Margarito was tailor made? Must be why he was the favorite, why he shitted on cotto, cintron twice, clottey too three young guns with his telegraphed punches. And what does the mayorga fight have to do with anything? So if he had and off night or found it difficult against an awkward opponent, didnt he fucking stop Mayorga at 154?
As far as PBF v JMM, I don't have a problem with it because JMM is better than PAC anyhow, I'd just rather see JMM take a tune up above 140 before jumping in with a rested floyd. And I think PBF v Shane is the best legacy fight out there for any of them. All the others are simply about money first, legacy a distant second.
"Sixty forty I kicks yo' ass, Sixty forty I tears yo' ass up" - Roy Jones
Bookmarks