Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 82

Thread: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #11
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    321
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    843
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pacquiao's Accomplishments aren't really that Great

    Quote Originally Posted by Addicted to_boxing View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by mad_takamura View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Addicted to_boxing View Post
    Nice try, but although the boxers names are impressive you never answered the questions of my post ! About fighting fighters coming off a loss in one of either their last or prior to last fights! Of fighting fighters with little elusiveness, Of fighting fighters with no"REAL" power Soto did not meet the calculated match requirements - too much of a power risk . Soto F/U his lil bro and Pac never redeemed the family name. Instead he gave a fight opportunity to a lighter weighing Larios. Now, Pac has surpassed Soto in weight and skill to warrant a match today

    GREAT GREAT GREAT handling by Cock-Roach. Where does this imply Pac fans are cockroaches? Come out of Pac;s anus for air please ....... This is a stab at Roach!


    Pointing out a a valid point does not make me a troll. Responding to a post with information not related to the content justifies how the smegma in your mouth has reached your brain!
    addicted to trolling, i guess your addiction to being a troll made you too high it clouded your judgment.

    you said pac replaced redemption of family name and avenging bobby pac's loss to soto by avoiding soto and fighting larios instead. tell me: are you, if ever you are in a sound mind, serious at all with this post?!

    coz you are completely false. it seems going around in boxing forums like this your only purpose is to troll. based to the chronological sequence of events your post is just too false and makes me wonder if i ever have to take you seriously.

    the pac larios fight happened at 2006 while soto beating bobby pac happened at 2007! so to who do pac have to avenge for when he fought larios instead? who did pac avoided and replaced larios for?

    this post just proves that you don't know what you're talking about addicted. all you really know is to spew hatred through trolling.
    you should change your name from addicted to boxing to addicted to trolling really.
    You are partially correct in that i said Larios but actually Pac decided to fight a washed up MAB in a rematch. Same message though, address that !!!! Pac pussed out despite seeing Soto beat the the piss out of his brother Bobby .... looking foward to seeing your excuse !!!
    ok here is my "excuse."
    there are 2 reasons why.
    1. market value. during that time, whose name is more established? mab or soto? to who shall pac have more reward in terms of ppv and ticket sales? and i don't think risk has to do anything with that. for me at that time soto can't even match up with pac so why would pac elude soto? my reason for this is because soto even suffered a knockdown from the lesser, more average bobby pac during their fight so what more if that was the pacman during that time? have you watched the fight? bobby decked him! however compared to bobby pac, pacman is more faster, skillful and stronger than his kid brother! imagine what the pacman would've done during that time! and i'm emphasizing during that time since you even admitted how pac has now outdone soto in terms of skill. poor soto.

    but let's get back to the market value. although soto beat rocky juarez impressively prior to the time of the mab-pac rematch, that doe'snt even warrant him a fight with pac imo that can outdo the ppv potential of a mab-pac2 with regards to mab's mexican and american fans. with mexican fans alone, mab has a better fanbase than la zorrita. and ticket sales and ppv buys? do we need to argue with that? mab owns soto off course.
    and mab being washed up? if he was he did'nt gave jmm a competetive fight. he even lasted with jmm exchanging and engaging blows. heck he even performed better than casa or juan diaz. both were ktfo'ed by jmm! his fight with khan recently didn't even proved more, coz that fight was stopped due to a headbutt.

    and quit whinning pac has outdone anybody from his potential foes in the lower weights in terms of weight and skill. you're sounding like pacdbest already! that's how pac is, a former flyweight winning all the way to the welterweights! that's phenomenal weather you admit it or not!

    2.pac's personality. pac always make sure that he gives back to the people who in more ways than one helped him get to the point where he is right now, boxing superstardom. when he comes home from a fight, he shares his blessing by having the whole people in his province and basically anyone who approaches him needing help) receive food money and clothes, each and everyone of them, knowing that his province is poverty stricken. he's too generous that even roach was afraid that he might lose half of his money by giving too much! he even gave one friend a new car, a stadium full of cockfighting afficionados 1000 pesos each ($22 each i guess, but that's a lot since my country is a 3rd world country.) he is a generous, humble, down to earth person willing to give back the blessings he receive. him being a devout catholic has a lot to do with that. and what is the connection in this to why he chose mab you ask?
    pac owes a lot to mab in one way or the other. he even explained this before the contract signing that if not to mab he wouldn't even be known today. that win by pac basically started his fame and recognition in the boxing world. if not that win against mab, i don't think he would even get a chance to fight em imo! so that rematch shows how he acknowledge that fact; he gave mab a chance to redeem himself again and so is the rematch.
    mab being washed up? 7 straight wins after his loss to pac and a ud loss to jmm makes that argument a little stale. i would only agree that em is the one who is washed up but not mab!

    sorry for this post being long. i hope i answered your querry satisfactory in your behalf.
    Last edited by mad_takamura; 07-05-2009 at 11:42 AM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-10-2009, 05:08 AM
  2. Mayweather: Pacquiao's got nothing on me
    By pacman79 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-20-2009, 07:17 PM
  3. What did you think of Pacquiao's performance.
    By El Gamo in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-09-2008, 06:38 AM
  4. Pacquiao's weight
    By donnydarkoIRL in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 40
    Last Post: 03-13-2008, 06:26 PM
  5. PACQUIAO'S PRESSURES!!!
    By mizpah in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 04-27-2006, 07:41 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing