
Originally Posted by
CFH
I would like to see a system put in place by which a manager can be voted out by a certain number of other managers. The purpose would be to facilitate the removal of those managers who are inactive, who push agendas (should this occur), those who refuse my sexual advances, or any other reason that could result in their removal.
Thoughts?
The key problem with this is, is will their replacement be any better? I mean JoeyUK is the only 'replacement' who's actually come in & done anything & to be fair to him, he's not one of the guys who's on the site every day, but at least he comes by & votes at times.
Most of the guys who've offered to be replacements aren't people who I can see making the effort to come in & I'm questionable of the boxing knowledge of some of them.
I'm not saying we don't need some new ones, but without people coming forward with the knowledge necessary it might be difficult. Why did Mick have to leave, he would've been perfect
I do think that we should institute some kind of discipline system to deal with your sexual predation of managers.
I bet hitmanhatton's locked up in your basement right now ya sicko
Bookmarks