Re: Paul Williams for vacant 8th spot at 160

Originally Posted by
Spicoli
We have discussions of a very possible Pavlik vs. Williams fight.....why force a vote on the past wright fight as opposed to Williams
fighting his way in against the top ranked Middle guy?
Where is the manager of the division?Would like to see Tams input on filling these spots.
I would propose that in the future all vacant spots are left open for a minimal amount of time prior to a vote on an
upcoming fight to fill a vacant spot.Leaves room for natural flexibility...think Darwin

.Bud...I think its the number of spots and hindsight voting that are getting me.Just seems, with much respect,manufactured a bit.Not trying to break balls here and dont want to get bogged down.Just voicing opinion.
Where oh where could little Tam be? At this point I don't think his input is very valid as he has been very inactive.
The thing with waiting for the result of Pavlik/ Williams is that if Williams loses he probably gets removed from the pool... right? Whereas if he enters the fight as our number 8 guy he has the opportunity the be demoted with a lose & still possible be ranked.
imo 8 is a very fair entry for Williams... The Ring has him at 5!
I remember we did the same thing Antillon for the 10th spot at 135 at the time based on his 2 previous fights at lightweight that had already happened... do I sense some favoritism? Or is your boy Urbano exempt?
If you like put up a poll to see if other members feel we should have a time limit before voting to fill vacancies. But I feel filling the vacancies as soon as they become vacant is the best way to go, it gives us a complete top 10, based on the majority of the active managers opinions & creates opportunities for guys fighting those we voted in to win/ earn ranking...
The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be
Bookmarks