Re: Bradley vs Campbell

Originally Posted by
ICB
I think Nate Campbell is getting seriously over looked here, i think Timothy Bradley is good but he's not that good. I've never been overly impressed by him, and he was floored twice by Kendall Holt, which shows he's very beatable.
Nate Campbell struggled in his last fight, but the guy he was fighting was 6'1 for crying out loud. Who wouldn't struggle against a 6'1 Lightweight ? im going for Nate Campbell here, i think he's very skilled and he has the experience to beat Timothy Bradley, who i think is getting a bit overrated.
I don't think anyone is overrating Bradley here, to be fair he was caught by a perfect flush hook right on the button from Holt, and he got back up and continued to work away he's a very blue collar fighter, with great recovery ability. Noone's saying he's some kind of superman, just a consistent workingman fighter, not to mention he has been fighting at 140 for quite sometime.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Bookmarks