Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Bradley VS Campbell

Voters
30. This poll is closed
  • Nate Campbell by Decision

    8 26.67%
  • Nate Campbell by TKO

    5 16.67%
  • Timothy Bradley by Decision

    13 43.33%
  • Timothy Bradley by TKO

    4 13.33%
  • Draw: ie... you are too scared to make your mind up!!!

    0 0%
Results 1 to 15 of 348

Thread: Bradley vs Campbell

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1436
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    It was a crappy ending to what was supposed to be a great fight.

    The referee was worthless, and the cut was caused by an accidental butt and thus the result should have been a NC and not a TKO win for Bradley.

    BUT Campbell asked for the fight to be stop and quit. And anytime you quit in the other guys hometown, knowing that the referee never confirmed that the cut was from an accidental clash of heads, well you are risking getting screwed.

    There is still a chance the commission could over turn this like they did with the Rahman vs. Toney fight.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    New England, USA
    Posts
    3,986
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1186
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    It was a crappy ending to what was supposed to be a great fight.

    The referee was worthless, and the cut was caused by an accidental butt and thus the result should have been a NC and not a TKO win for Bradley.

    BUT Campbell asked for the fight to be stop and quit. And anytime you quit in the other guys hometown, knowing that the referee never confirmed that the cut was from an accidental clash of heads, well you are risking getting screwed.

    There is still a chance the commission could over turn this like they did with the Rahman vs. Toney fight.
    Thats what surprised me. Nate is always complaining about the politics of boxing, yet as a seasoned pro he banks on the Calafornia officials to be "fair." He is now 0-3 in California. I think that he does have issues fighting away from his hometown of Florida, which he seldom does.
    Psalm 144: Blessed be the LORD my Rock, who trains my hands for war, and my fingers for battle

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Chicago
    Posts
    831
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1158
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    IMO Nate wanted out of that fight. I think he knew he was outgunned and as soon as the cut happened he tryed to get out of the fight. Like others have said Nate should have at least found out what the ruling was on the cut (punch or HB). Instead he basically told his corner he quit. Once he found out the ref ruled it a punch he should have at least tryed to continue for a half round or so. See what happens.......

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    9,794
    Mentioned
    21 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1436
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by BoomBoom View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hulk View Post
    It was a crappy ending to what was supposed to be a great fight.

    The referee was worthless, and the cut was caused by an accidental butt and thus the result should have been a NC and not a TKO win for Bradley.

    BUT Campbell asked for the fight to be stop and quit. And anytime you quit in the other guys hometown, knowing that the referee never confirmed that the cut was from an accidental clash of heads, well you are risking getting screwed.

    There is still a chance the commission could over turn this like they did with the Rahman vs. Toney fight.
    Thats what surprised me. Nate is always complaining about the politics of boxing, yet as a seasoned pro he banks on the Calafornia officials to be "fair." He is now 0-3 in California. I think that he does have issues fighting away from his hometown of Florida, which he seldom does.
    I think Nate knew he was behind on the cards, and felt the cut was bad and the fight would be stopped in the next couple rounds so rather than go to the cards and lose a decision he tried to get a no contest.

    It backfired though cus of the ref being a dodgy lil bitch.
    "You knocked him down...now how bout you try knockin me down ?"

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    7,832
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2149
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. His suppose to be a matured pro now but relied on officials to call the fight fair? He was getting beat up and knock back to the ropes.

    I think Bradley deserves credit he pounded Nate anywhere he can hit him. Nate imo knew he wasn't going to last so he went for a nc decision.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    3,276
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2602
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. His suppose to be a matured pro now but relied on officials to call the fight fair? He was getting beat up and knock back to the ropes.

    I think Bradley deserves credit he pounded Nate anywhere he can hit him. Nate imo knew he wasn't going to last so he went for a nc decision.

    i agree with everything above

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3177
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. .
    Bradley Butted him, the Ref called it that was stuttering and stammering and looked like a deer in the headlights after the fight... The Butt caused the cut, ringside Doc saw blood behind nates eye and nate couldnt see.. Regardless of how the fight would have panned out, the fact remains the ref blew it and it was a bad call

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    6,077
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2125
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    I'm late with my imput on last night's showdown because someone in this house can't stop playing around on Farmville.

    Campbell should have gotten his NC but it did seem like he was on his way to some sort of defeat.

    I hope I was able to explain the situation to you dum-dum pops.

    Seriously, what is there left to say after that? In fact the only reason I posted a comment is so you guys know I'm alive.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    2,130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1976
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. .
    Bradley Butted him, the Ref called it that was stuttering and stammering and looked like a deer in the headlights after the fight... The Butt caused the cut, ringside Doc saw blood behind nates eye and nate couldnt see.. Regardless of how the fight would have panned out, the fact remains the ref blew it and it was a bad call
    Nobody on this board disagrees that it was a bad call. Maybe you think Bradley was butting intentional. I don't see it that way. I think the butt was unintentional. Yes, it should have been an NC. This is not the first or last time ref got it wrong, but Nate was clearly looking to have the fight stopped. If Nate had felt that he was going to win the fight, he would have soldiered on I promise you- like Cotto and many others have done.

    I feel for Nate getting a bad call. The same thing happened to Ward against Phillips and it sucked when that happened, and it sucked again for Ward in the Leija fight when a cut caused by a punch got called a butt and Leija got the win from hometown judges. Nobody like to see the wrong call, but you are acting like Tim Bradley and the ref rain a train on your mom or your sister. I would have loved to see Nate pull it off last night, but it wasn't his night. I know, he knew it, most people watching knew it, and if you get over yourself and rewatch the fight objectively, you will know it, too.

    If Nate wasn't fighting a dirty fight himself, perhaps people would have more simpathy for him. But Nate was butting, holding, hitting low, and generally trying to play head games with Bradley. That was pretty obvious.

    You make a bad analogy to the JMM/Diaz fight. Don't even try to make like Nate would have been able to pull a JMM against Bradley. Even old, Marquez was clearly faster than Diaz (never known for his handspeed anyway). It looked like Diaz might be able to dictate the fight based on strenght and aggression, but he wasn't making Marquez look old. He was making him look small.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Puerto Rico
    Posts
    7,933
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1368
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by RozzySean View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. .
    Bradley Butted him, the Ref called it that was stuttering and stammering and looked like a deer in the headlights after the fight... The Butt caused the cut, ringside Doc saw blood behind nates eye and nate couldnt see.. Regardless of how the fight would have panned out, the fact remains the ref blew it and it was a bad call
    Nobody on this board disagrees that it was a bad call. Maybe you think Bradley was butting intentional. I don't see it that way. I think the butt was unintentional. Yes, it should have been an NC. This is not the first or last time ref got it wrong, but Nate was clearly looking to have the fight stopped. If Nate had felt that he was going to win the fight, he would have soldiered on I promise you- like Cotto and many others have done.

    I feel for Nate getting a bad call. The same thing happened to Ward against Phillips and it sucked when that happened, and it sucked again for Ward in the Leija fight when a cut caused by a punch got called a butt and Leija got the win from hometown judges. Nobody like to see the wrong call, but you are acting like Tim Bradley and the ref rain a train on your mom or your sister. I would have loved to see Nate pull it off last night, but it wasn't his night. I know, he knew it, most people watching knew it, and if you get over yourself and rewatch the fight objectively, you will know it, too.

    If Nate wasn't fighting a dirty fight himself, perhaps people would have more simpathy for him. But Nate was butting, holding, hitting low, and generally trying to play head games with Bradley. That was pretty obvious.

    You make a bad analogy to the JMM/Diaz fight. Don't even try to make like Nate would have been able to pull a JMM against Bradley. Even old, Marquez was clearly faster than Diaz (never known for his handspeed anyway). It looked like Diaz might be able to dictate the fight based on strenght and aggression, but he wasn't making Marquez look old. He was making him look small.
    yea i agree, even though i kinda felt that the comments from Bradley were a bit out of place (the whole, "i was gonna win anyway, he was getting older"), i very much doubt that the headbutt was intentional, he seems to be a complete class act and willing to take on anyone, and that's only something you can admire, i hope the decision is overruled, cause if there's ever one that should be it's this one, but i doubt it will

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3177
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Bradley vs Campbell

    Quote Originally Posted by RozzySean View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Julius Rain View Post
    the old dummy nate came out last night. Nate wanted out of that fight and intentionally tried to get a no contest decision. .
    Bradley Butted him, the Ref called it that was stuttering and stammering and looked like a deer in the headlights after the fight... The Butt caused the cut, ringside Doc saw blood behind nates eye and nate couldnt see.. Regardless of how the fight would have panned out, the fact remains the ref blew it and it was a bad call
    Nobody on this board disagrees that it was a bad call. Maybe you think Bradley was butting intentional. I don't see it that way. I think the butt was unintentional. Yes, it should have been an NC. This is not the first or last time ref got it wrong, but Nate was clearly looking to have the fight stopped. If Nate had felt that he was going to win the fight, he would have soldiered on I promise you- like Cotto and many others have done.

    I feel for Nate getting a bad call. The same thing happened to Ward against Phillips and it sucked when that happened, and it sucked again for Ward in the Leija fight when a cut caused by a punch got called a butt and Leija got the win from hometown judges. Nobody like to see the wrong call, but you are acting like Tim Bradley and the ref rain a train on your mom or your sister. I would have loved to see Nate pull it off last night, but it wasn't his night. I know, he knew it, most people watching knew it, and if you get over yourself and rewatch the fight objectively, you will know it, too.

    If Nate wasn't fighting a dirty fight himself, perhaps people would have more simpathy for him. But Nate was butting, holding, hitting low, and generally trying to play head games with Bradley. That was pretty obvious.

    You make a bad analogy to the JMM/Diaz fight. Don't even try to make like Nate would have been able to pull a JMM against Bradley. Even old, Marquez was clearly faster than Diaz (never known for his handspeed anyway). It looked like Diaz might be able to dictate the fight based on strenght and aggression, but he wasn't making Marquez look old. He was making him look small.
    I didnt think it was intentional at all, I was pissed because the ref was a moron and his explanation was shit... On the replay he said he saw the butt and ruled it accidental, then he advocates in that 8th of a second after the butt that a punch campbell blocked opened up the cut

    Really because that happens The only time to me Bradley looked something is when he was landing Calzaghe Combos against Manfredo after the cut that was FACTUALLY bleeding behind Nates eye...

    So none of us know what the outcome of a fight that was 25% in progress but the rules are the rules and it was an amateurish and bush league error by a moronic ref that looked more confused than anyone
    Last edited by JT Rock; 08-03-2009 at 10:26 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. campbell v bradley who you got
    By paddy448 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 06-26-2009, 08:37 PM
  2. Timothy Bradley vs Nate Campbell
    By fan johnny in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 06-18-2009, 01:22 PM
  3. Bradley to face Campbell!
    By TigerFan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 06-13-2009, 05:09 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing