Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
I'm not keen on the idea without further discussion. I do see the merits of dropping a guy like Diaz, because let's face it Mayo is no world-beater & would probably get handled by most guys in the Top 15 of his division. However, I don't think that if, for example, Marquez loses to Mayweather or Pacquiao loses to Cotto that they should drop lower in their respective divisions. I don't think Darchinyan's defeat to Agbeko means that he's no longer the best Super-Flyweight in the world. I'm not going to vote on this just yet.

Btw, I haven't been on in a week because of personal stuff so if you could point out anything I've missed that needs voting & Killer if you could let me know what you've checked for your updates so I can merge the old threads together I'd appreciate it
Nothing much has changed, all the votes for this week have closed bar this one. Hope everythings good with you mate.

I agree with what your saying about Marquez & Agbeko, but we need something to deal with cases like Diaz'. Maybe we could edit killers rule of demoting a little... if a fighter is nomiated to be demoted the options should run from his current rank to the pool e.g. Diaz is number 6 so he could drop 1-4 (ranks 7-10) spots or straight to the pool.
What about just saying if a fighter loses two fights in a row we vote to drop him to the pool, regardless of what weightclass he's ranked in? This would simplify things from what we are talking about.