Would someone care to defend Marciano based on my list?
I mean really, people worship him but in essence how good was he and how would he matchup against a more skilled talent pool... I understand he had insane cardio and iron will, but he was slow and unrefined and would get crushed by most top 5 heavies dating back to the 70's.
I can even see a guy like Haye disposing of him.. How do you suppose he would fair against Dwight Muhhamed Qawi?
Last edited by JT Rock; 08-09-2009 at 05:56 PM.
Well, except if he did what's alleged here, that goes well beyond being prudent with his money. Bernard Hopkins is prudent with his money, however, if he did some shit that's basically theft, people would call him on it not let some nostalgic image cloud it. Ignoring Marciano's questionable legacy (it is interesting that some who claim him as the greatest HW are more than happy to claim the likes of PBF & ODLH cherry-picked), behaving like this isn't acceptable whoever you are, whether you're a world-class boxer or someone who sits on the couch all day doing fuck all. It's still being a greedy, manipulative dickhead
LaStarza, Savold, Vingo, Layne, etcaargh. Today, he would be fighting as a light heavy or cruiser and that's where the copmarisons should be made based on relativity, IMO. Otherwise, we engage in generational prejudice. He beat all 49 who were put in front oof him. Surley, that does not warrant the degree of hostility of some of the posts.
“If you want loyalty, buy a dog.” Ricky Hatton
LaStarza beat him & was robbed because one of the most ridiculous rulings in the history of the sport, although I give him credit for the 2nd win though. Savold was about as shot as a fighter could be at that point. Vingo was little more than a young prospect who had been pro only 18 months or something when he faced Marciano & was overmatched. Layne was a credible win, however, in truth none of these guys were elite fighters. It's like claiming Tyson as the greatest & then using Pinklon Thomas & Carl Williams as evidence of his solid opposition
Do not let success go to your head and do not let failure get to your heart.
The fact is Rocky Marciano fought everyone, he needed to fight and avoided no one. You can't blame Rocky Marciano for the era not being like the 70's, he beat every man infront of him and thats all counts to me. Plus to the people saying Rocky Marciano isn't skilled.
Well doesn't that mean he done brilliantly well, then for not being skilled ? 49-0 and being one of the top 10 Heavyweights of all time for not being skilled ? just makes Rocky Marciano look that much better.
I'm not going by 2nd hand accounts about Marciano's character being sleazy like that. One thing for sure is that the man had tremendous heart and beat everyone that he faced. And for a guy supposedly having no skills that's one hell of an achievement to go undefeated in your career.
Formerly LuciferTheGreat
Not really interested in that crap dude.. The facts are the facts. Out of that list name me one guy that Marciano could have beaten..
Even a 40 year old version of Foreman would have caved his face in
Like Lucifer the great said, his undefeated streak dosent impress me, because the opposition was extremely weak, if a champion defended against a guy with 40 losses you guys would be calling for his head.
Rocky isint even the best fighter to come out of Brockton.. Marvin Hagler has that distinction
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Bookmarks