Thanks: 
Likes: 
Dislikes: 
Re: Premier League 2009-2010 prediction thread!!
Well actually go back through my posts and you will see some of the stuff i posted wasn't even in the media. Stuart Taylor signing is an example of that. I also said we'd got Tevez about 1 month before he signed, depsite various media reporting he was going to go to Chelsea. I also posted the exact time Adebayor would be unveiled despite the media saying the deal had hit the rocks. I also posted the date on which Kolo Toure would sign - which i was one day out. I also said Lescott would hand in a transfer request which he has done. I also said we'd make a big move for John Terry about 2 weeks before the media even had a wiff. I also said Bassong wouldn't be signing despite the media saying he would be signing within the next 48 hours.Originally Posted by skel1983
Sorry mate but that is short sighted at best.
Number one City players in general are on nowhere near what they are allegedly on according to the players. I know this for a fact. I don't know exactly what they are on but i do know nobody takes home more than 92k per week after tax (Robinho i'm guessing). Gareth Barry is nowhere near the 130k p/w reported in The Sun, Bellamy is nowhere near the 90k p/w as also reported in the media. I know this because it was mentioned at a Supporters club open-forum by Garry Cook ( i was there and heard it myself).
Adebayor has been given a good rise to move and so has Tevez but to say they are moving purely for financial reasons is very narrow minded. Furthermore nearly all footballers get a pay rise when they join a new club. Berbatov, Valencia, Rooney, Ferdinand, Vidic...need i go on? If everything was all about success then surely these players wouldn't need to practically double (correct me if i'm wrong but i'd guess Valencia, Rooney and Vidic must have come very close) their wages to join such a club? Would they?
Sure we are doing it on a new level but that's what you have to do to be competitive. United have done it, Chelsea have done it and after us there will be another club that does it.
The playing with better players argument is also a little bit silly because at City both tevez and Adebayor will be playing with some very talented players. We certainly have the resources to add to that pool of players and i think we have made our ambitions perfectly clear. We have considerably strengthened whereas only Chelsea arguably haven't been weakened.
By your way of thinking the best players would only ever go to the most successful clubs so that defeats the object of competition. If that happened we might aswell not bother with the Premier League and just have United - Liverpool live on Sky Box Office every week.
Where's the fun in that?
The way you go mate you would think you were Mark Hughes you know this that and everything that goes on but most the stuff you have said and all these facts you seem to know about are either printed in the sun or on sky sports news.
My way of thinking the best players would only ever go to the most succesful clubs so that defeats the object of compitition?? No my way of thinking like I said before is why the fuck would you want to join a club who can rarely sell there home games out who wont be in europe and will more then likely not be in the chamipons league for at least a couple of years, when you can stay or join a club that will be challanging for all the top titles and be playing in the Champions League?? ONE ANSWER AND ONE ANSWER ONLY CASH!!! If you want to believe its because Man City is this wonderful attractive world renowned club thats your decision, but noone else is fooled.
I dont blame City they have the money and good luck to them to get what players they can but players like the players i highlighted are money grabbing cunts.
Anyway back on point, Let's assume the players you mentioned are just money grabbing cunts. So if say Notts County or QPR offered them 200k p/w to play for them they would take it right? Probably not. Of course money is a factor just like it is for anybody else in any career field, but there also has to be sporting ambition that matches the money. I never once said we are this wonderfully attractive world renowned club, although we have a good history, but again it matters very little when we have the resources that we currently have. Past history counts for exactly fuck all when assessing your chances of future success. For example, Liverpool have a fantastic history yet see how dismissive Sir BaconFace and a good deal of Man Utd fans/news reporters are about Liverpool's ability to challenege for the title.
We have the chance to be successful in the future just like Chelsea had when Roman came in, and i'm pretty sure other players can see that. Like i said before, money is a factor but to say it's the only factor is so short-sighted.
Selling home games out is also an irrelevant point. Look at your own home attendances just before the Sky money came in. You know, around about the time you we're a mid-table team/good cup team. You wasn't selling out but when the success came, the attendances grew. It just means the rest of the seats are sold to glory-hunting, prawn sandwich eating day-trippers or if you like, the success achieved by your club has attracted more fans.
Finally, even if the entire Man City team was made of up mercenaries, how would that stop them from being successful? Players aren't going to under-perform because they are being paid well. They are still going to perform to the best of their ability. What if we signed 11 world class mercenaries? Would we still have no sporting ambition? So even if we're playing along with your notion that they are money grabbing cunts, at what point does it change from a team of mercenaries to a team capable of challenging for the title?
I'd say 1 - 2 seasons. And what guarantee of success would the likes of Adebayor, Toure, Barry, Lescott and Santa Cruz have had over that period if they had have stayed at their previous clubs? None because none of them have the resources to take them to the next level. We have the resources to take us beyond that level. The end.
 |
|
Reply With Quote
It's the clubs decision and he has 3 years left on his contract. So he can't do shiit to change it.
Bookmarks