this wont end well.
and Bhop is in no way overrated.
I agree completely. He is well overrated.
His only really meaningful fight against a fighter in his own weight class in recent times was Calzaghe and Hopkins lost that quite convincingly. All of his fights since Taylor have been smoke and mirrors....except for Tarver. But even then Tarver has been pretty rubbish since then so you can argue that Tarver was over the hill and overrated anway.
Hopkins barely squeezed by Taylor giving up half the fight in both of those showings. And prior to that his record had a lot of filler and money fights with smaller men moving up.
lol this is almost laughable
If you wanna claim hopkins is overrated you may as well play the same card with the likes of jones, mosley etc
The guy hasnt been put down in 20+ years of boxing, has completely dominated a division over a 5-6 year period. Every single one of his losses have been due to close decisions that could of gone either way...
Jones 115-113 Hopkins
Taylor 115-113 Hopkins
Taylor 115-113 Hopkins
Calzaghe 115-112 Hopkins
If you wanna hate the man by all accounts hate away as many do. But to actually make such a ridiculous statement about an all time greats legacy isnt gonna gain you much noterity amongst the hardcore posters on this site
one dangerous horrible bloke
I'm sure B-Hop is now sitting somewhere hanging his head and crying in his non-alcoholic beverage after these scathing statements.
Echols and Allen, for example, were tough SOBs. Just watch the fights. A guy's record doesn't mean anything. The guy isn't going to hit you with softer punches or be less difficult to hit if he doesn't have a protective management/promotional team and if he has to work a full-time job in addition to his boxing career. Hopkins is the guy that had to actually BE IN THE RING with these guys.
There are two types of people in this world: Those that talk the most and do the least, and those who talk the least and do the most. Keyboard warriors underrating a professional like Hopkins make me sick. The guy's 44 years old, on the top of his game, fought anybody he could get in the ring with him, is the best pure technician in the game and outperforms any old boxer in history. He may not be the best fighter of all time, but he is in no way overrated. Ask anyone who's actually in the game what they think of Bernard Hopkins. Nothing but respect.
The very fact that you say he fought Roy Jones Jr prime to prime tells me you have an axe to grind. If you've actually seen Hopkins fight throughout the years and know what his development was like, you'll know that's BS.
![]()
To the brave belong all things.
Are my eyes playing tricks on me or did the title say OVERRATED??
This guy is W49 L5 D1 Never been stopped
He lost his first world title bid on points to Roy Jones this is when every fighter Roy faced was getting sparked yet bernard made an argument of it and lost on points.
He then fought for his second chance at the IBF middleweight crown against Sergundo Mecado he was dropped twice once in the 5th and in the 7th yet fought hard enough to get the draw. In the rematch Bernard won to become IBF middleweight champion Mecado was no mug
John David jackson
Glenn Johnson We all know what Glenn has gone on to achieve Bernard is the only man to stop him.
Simon brown
Antwun Echols
Robert Allen
Syd Vanderpool
Carl Daniels
William Joppy
Howard Eastman
None of these guys were mugs and some were former world champs
He unified the middleweight division by beating
Keith Holmes WBC
Felix Trinidad WBA
Oscar De La Hoya WBO
He became the Light-heavyweight Kingpin by beating Antonio Tarver he also beat Winky Wright
He lost a close SD12 to Joe Calzaghe many think Bernard did enough to win me included
He then went on to totally outbox the next unbeaten big thing who was KTFO everything in his path Kelly Pavlik
Lets not forget alot of his big wins have come in his 40's he's now 44 soon to be 45
So OVERRATED i think not my friend![]()
one dangerous horrible bloke
John David jackson - never the same after the beating he took from Castro... What a KO!!
Glen Johnson was never hurt in their fight.. Also he was not nearly as good as he got when he aged. He learned how to fight IN the ring.
All of Hopkins other big wins are from little guys moving up. Tito, DLH, Pavlik
He never liked to face big punchers after his brushes with KD early in his career. He cherry picks quite a bit. But, hey, I keep thinking he's at the end of his rope and he pulls off another win here and there.
My point is.. RIGHT NOW he is overrated... Past 4 years anyway.
I think he definitely will be HOF and deserves so. But he was never better than Calzaghge, Jones, Hagler, Lamotta, SRR..
Last edited by JonnyFolds; 08-21-2009 at 03:41 PM.
"Floyd needs to inject Xylocaine into his balls to gain the courage to fight Pacquiao."
- and I quote from some random guy on the internet
These are very valid points.
I appreciate Hopkins ability greatly. I've come to basically love his style of fighting. The old young him, the new old him... All top draw boxing.
But yes unfortunately, as with his style of fighting... Perception is a key word.
I wont pick too many holes though, Bernard is a marque fighter when referring to Boxing's elite BUT i do think the time has come as of late where Bernard is no longer good for the sport of boxing.
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
When I read this title I thought I had come from the bar and drank too much. But then I remembered...I don't drink! WTF! Bernard Hopkins overrated?! Really
Well, we know who on this forum doesn't watch boxing. Outside of the RJJ fight name one fight in Bernard's career where he was beat without controversy? YOU CAN'T!!! I am no BHop fan at all! But I know what the truth is and I know Bernard is definitely not overrated. That is just stupid. Who is the only man to beat Kelly Pavlik and with ease at that? Who is the only man to KO Felix Trinidad? Who is the only man to KO, not TKO, Oscar De la Hoya? Who is the only man to KO Glen Johnson? Who is the only man in boxing history to go defend his middleweight title 20 times successfully? Who gave Joe Calzaghe his closest and only controversial fight at 44 years old? Anybody who thinks Calzaghe won that fight convincingly is drunk off hatred. He may have won but that fight was razor thin either way. What is overrated about Bernard Hopkins
Anybody can break down any fighter with bullcrap hating stats and in attempts to lessen his status. But how do you take away the accomplishments? I challenge anyone who thinks BHop is overrated to name a fighter who they think is better at middleweight and I will show how that fighter is overrated. That game is too easy to do when you don't have to show their accomplishments and belittle "all" of them with facts. Tarver was the undisputed light heavweight champ, Winky was the most avoided fighter in the game, Pavlik was the undefeated KO steamrolling middleweight champ, and BHop was over 40 years old beating all these guys. Name one guy who you think is better than BHop and its an easy picking to belittle their status just as well. RJJ, PBF, Pac, they all can be belittle but the argument will sound just as stupid as...Bernard Hopkins is overrated.
Last edited by blegit; 08-21-2009 at 09:12 AM.
....
....
........
Is there a punchline to this thread?
Hidden Content IN CASE THEY ALL FORGOT WHAT REAL HEAVYWEIGHT POWER WAS!!!
His best wins were againsed smaller guys I've always said that, called him boring too. The Calzaghe fight play acting was just pathetic though, really it was embarrassing to watch a world class fighter try cheat like that.
The Pavlik fight was great though he put on a master class and I enjoyed the fight from start to finish, I wish he was that eager to fight in every fight.
Dude, you can say what you want, you can pick apart all his fights and opponents, say he's dull, boring, a dirty fighter, ect ect ect. You can say whatever you want.
The bottom line is, this guy is 45 years old and he's whipping top class opposition.
Bernard is the picture of what a great prizefighter should be. He was not blessed with great athletic ability, he's not super fast and he was never a big puncher. He got a late start in boxing. But he showed what hard work, dedication, and DISCIPLINE can do for you.
Bhop is one of the greatest of all time, no question. Bernard has forgotten more than most boxers will ever know about the sweet science.
To be fair the words over rated can be taken different ways depending on your emotion and respect towards who gets labeled with it.
With the words (by some) added to it and you have a different point.
I dont think he ment Bernard is total sh!t just he measured his way through some fights .
As did Roy Jones as did Calzage and many other champions too all measure their way through their career like choosen stepping stones.
Its no biggy, it is just forms of control both in and out of the ring they are all great fighters.
Like we just discussed about Lewis he was a very measuring fighter the whole time in the ring and some thought it was boring and he could do alot (better for us not for him) with more risks shown.
Its a tough game props to all in it , I say use what ever is legally available at the time to get the odds further on your side;but in saying that, full props to those who just want the hardest fights and come with it all laid on the line on the night too cause they are the best fightsby the best fighters.
Mosley comes to mind; greatest bring it all fighter, bar acouple of minor hiccups like fighting a friend once for warm up fight, but hey he still knocked him cold after he got enough of his warm up rounds in.
I'm waiting for it also..
One of the points was "he's a dull fighter".. well sorry he doesn't entertain you, but he still wins.. Exciting has nothing to do with being overrated/underrated..
Same goes for being a "whiner" and being a "dirty fighter"..
Gatti was an exciting fighter, but he's on no P4P list.
Hopkins was by no means in his prime against Jones, and Jones still said it was one of his hardest fights.
He floored Calzaghe early and many believe he won that fight.. If he had won two more rounds, where some rounds could have gone eithe rway, down the stretch he would have won the fight.. Against the undefeated Joe Calzaghe, i wouldn't say that is overrated.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks