Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Ok Bilbo here it is, Plain as I can explain it. Tough Gong

Share/Bookmark

Threaded View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #7
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3374
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Ok Bilbo here it is, Plain as I can explain it. Tough Gong

    Quote Originally Posted by Youngblood View Post
    I will speak briefly on the concept of alternate realities, or the idea of duality and even kick that potential concept up a notch given the current research in M-string theory and hypothesis underway.

    Re: alternate realities and universes.

    As of now, part of why theoretical physicists are so interested in understanding the moments microseconds after creation isnt so much because of some spiritual ideal, but moreso because all of our math and science on the origin of the universe brings us to the moment of the big bang. We cannot look further back then that. Only after. And to skip all the detail which is we understand our age in billions of years of time, we know there was a explosion, and that we all grew from it, have to this point as of today...

    As of today, we realize we do not live in a 4 dimensional world/universe, but that it is comprised of many more dimensions. Part of the secret to unraveling that, with science, is in understanding the functions and values of unseeable particles that react under extreme force. The one thing we once thought was easy math and physics for us, as far as laws of nature went, was Newtons Law of gravity. Old stuff right, apple falls from the tree, hits the ground, therefore that is gravity and gravity ultimately keeps this whole universe together in various ways interwoven with time, bending and stretching it.

    But is gravity really so simple? Well shit, apparantly it isn't. Of all the forces of nature,we have come to know with a certainty that gravity isn't a powerful force at all in our universe, but the weakest of all natural forces. But why?

    Part of the answer that is being looked at is that we expect there is a thing called a graviton, that during that extreme explosion, is a particle and function of gravity which slips out of our universe during supersymmetry into what is called a brane. A brane could best be described as a parallel universe, which may reside but a billionth of a degree beside us, and is a slight variation of our universe. Where everything is very similar to what you have now...except just slightly altered. Always there, just not seeable from our universe. And that there are many branes, and that each bit or a part of gravity slips from brane to brane, and each brane is slightly different. And the further away from our universe measured by branes it is, then the further from our reality it is too, although parts of our reality still reside in it, in all of them to varying degrees simutaneouesly.

    So given this research by people who in no way hold any religous belief, spiritual belief, and only try to see things from a completely science and math based probabiilties and laws of physics and nature view, it does lend itself to things like duality. It lends itself to the concept there might be a hell of a lot more then just duality also, as there may very well be an infinate number of similar realities all living very close to us, namely called branes, ultimately being alternate hidden universes. Our alternate realities.
    Sorry but are you really so naieve to believe such people exist?

    Every person on earth has a worldview and an belief system through which they filter their experiences.

    Some of the most famous scientific and philosophical minds, Sagan, Asimov, Dawkins, Jay Gould, Freud, Monod, Kinsey, even David Attenborogh are some of the biggest fundamentalist and most 'religious' people who have lived in the past one hundred years.

    They are all committed humanists, actively involved in the spread of their religion of atheism and are anything but impartial observers of the truth.

    Watch this video and tell me honestly that you think Richard Dawkins is an impartial obvserver and searcher for truth

    Richard Dawkins on militant atheism | Video on TED.com

    By the way, I do also think Richard is a very funny guy, much of book the God Delusion is hilarious, he is funny in his contempt.
    Last edited by Kev; 08-29-2009 at 06:30 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Is plain fanboyism causing people to nitpick?
    By Taeth in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 05-03-2007, 05:50 AM
  2. Eubank backs Calzaghe for TV gong
    By WWatt in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-09-2006, 02:53 AM
  3. Replies: 60
    Last Post: 11-06-2006, 11:15 PM
  4. Guys who just plain suck
    By Von Milash in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 07-31-2006, 05:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing