Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

View Poll Results: Fighters in the pool filling vacancies

Voters
4. This poll is closed
  • Yes, they should have won a fight since entering the pool

    3 75.00%
  • They don't need to have won a fight since being removed from the ratings

    1 25.00%
Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Fighters in the pool

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1709
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fighters in the pool

    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post

    What its really for is guys being voted out of the ratings, having to win a fight before they are eligible to be voted into the ratings again. A perfect example would be someone like Firat Arslan... he has not been active at all but he is in the pool because he was removed from the ratings. I just feel these types of fighters should have to win a fight before we consider them for the ratings again
    I agree with that, I just find it a bit annoying that we have very few complete divisions. I'd like to think by the time we'd had this running a year, we'd have them all full for the Top 10.

    I also think regarding the pool, we should be able to elect fighters to it regardless of whether they have an upcoming match-up
    That's a good idea & I don't think anyone will disagree with you, all we need to do is put up a vote & see how the committee feels.

    As for filling vacancies we haven't done too bad I think, 160 & 108 have been the hardest to fill imo. 135 has upcoming fights that can fill positions & 154 is very active also with good fights in the future to fill ratings
    Yeah, 160 is one where I feel there are definitely issues, we've only got one guy in the pool (Geale) who is really worthy of being ranked at present. Plus with David Lopez dropping out soon having not fought at the weight in a year, I feel we definitely need some new people in there. I'll put people up rather than keep desperately looking for something to fill the void.

    I know what you mean about filling them, but it frustrates me that our Top 10 rankings are generally Top 9s or even 8s. We obviously have to keep it moving, but I think I'm gonna get pro-active filling these vacancies over the next month.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    6,176
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2312
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Fighters in the pool

    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Galaxy View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JazMerkin View Post

    I agree with that, I just find it a bit annoying that we have very few complete divisions. I'd like to think by the time we'd had this running a year, we'd have them all full for the Top 10.

    I also think regarding the pool, we should be able to elect fighters to it regardless of whether they have an upcoming match-up
    That's a good idea & I don't think anyone will disagree with you, all we need to do is put up a vote & see how the committee feels.

    As for filling vacancies we haven't done too bad I think, 160 & 108 have been the hardest to fill imo. 135 has upcoming fights that can fill positions & 154 is very active also with good fights in the future to fill ratings
    Yeah, 160 is one where I feel there are definitely issues, we've only got one guy in the pool (Geale) who is really worthy of being ranked at present. Plus with David Lopez dropping out soon having not fought at the weight in a year, I feel we definitely need some new people in there. I'll put people up rather than keep desperately looking for something to fill the void.

    I know what you mean about filling them, but it frustrates me that our Top 10 rankings are generally Top 9s or even 8s. We obviously have to keep it moving, but I think I'm gonna get pro-active filling these vacancies over the next month.
    That's good to hear, I think other manager's are concerned about filling the #10 as that guy may be pushed out it a higher ranked fighter is defeated. But imo if #10 is pushed to the pool it gives him another 6 months before we review his progress, plus I think it goes a long way to strengthening our pools
    The Best There Is, The Best There Was, The Best There Ever Will Be

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 4
    Last Post: 04-14-2008, 07:02 PM
  2. The 'Pool adds more players
    By El Kabong in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 07-22-2007, 10:52 PM
  3. pool Exercise?
    By JAVIER85 in forum Ask the Trainer
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 07-19-2007, 04:49 AM
  4. Amazing pool player
    By beds in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 04-23-2006, 08:44 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing