Official Super Six Follow Live Thread

[eagle]

the thing is dirrell held like mad! I agree froch looked bad but i had it even, i just cant give a round to a man who lands 4 punches and then holds so he cant be hit. I thinbk bit of a dodgy decision but i had it even

What a load of biased shit. I cant give a man a win who doesnt land 4 punches the whole night. Even? Idiot.

ok then if dirrell gets a point taken for holding in every round because he HELD ALOT and no one will disagree even if you think he won. But yes if dirrell gets a point taken off every round for holding then i will score it even because dirrell landed more. For the record i think dirrell is a far better fighter but didnt do enough to take a champs belt by holding etc

Well what about Frochs rabbit punching. You gonna take points off for that?

[oakleyno1]

What a load of biased shit. I cant give a man a win who doesnt land 4 punches the whole night. Even? Idiot.

ok then if dirrell gets a point taken for holding in every round because he HELD ALOT and no one will disagree even if you think he won. But yes if dirrell gets a point taken off every round for holding then i will score it even because dirrell landed more. For the record i think dirrell is a far better fighter but didnt do enough to take a champs belt by holding etc

Well what about Frochs rabbit punching. You gonna take points off for that?

the rabbit punches were a result of the holding - if the holding wasnt there they wouldnt of occured. i agree froch fought like someone from fucking ufc in there lol but the referee did not do his job properly - yes he broke them up reasonably well but you have to take points off eventually and it would of been ridiculous if he had taken off points against froch if he wasnt for dirrells holding.

[eagle]

ok then if dirrell gets a point taken for holding in every round because he HELD ALOT and no one will disagree even if you think he won. But yes if dirrell gets a point taken off every round for holding then i will score it even because dirrell landed more. For the record i think dirrell is a far better fighter but didnt do enough to take a champs belt by holding etc

Well what about Frochs rabbit punching. You gonna take points off for that?

the rabbit punches were a result of the holding - if the holding wasnt there they wouldnt of occured. i agree froch fought like someone from fucking ufc in there lol but the referee did not do his job properly - yes he broke them up reasonably well but you have to take points off eventually and it would of been ridiculous if he had taken off points against froch if he wasnt for dirrells holding.

No it wouldnt have been as ridiculous as warning Froch yet not taking points then deducting Dirrel after no warnings. The refereeing and judgung were ridiculously biased and only an idiot would see it any other way.

[ElTerribleMorales]

ok then if dirrell gets a point taken for holding in every round because he HELD ALOT and no one will disagree even if you think he won. But yes if dirrell gets a point taken off every round for holding then i will score it even because dirrell landed more. For the record i think dirrell is a far better fighter but didnt do enough to take a champs belt by holding etc

Well what about Frochs rabbit punching. You gonna take points off for that?

the rabbit punches were a result of the holding - if the holding wasnt there they wouldnt of occured. i agree froch fought like someone from fucking ufc in there lol but the referee did not do his job properly - yes he broke them up reasonably well but you have to take points off eventually and it would of been ridiculous if he had taken off points against froch if he wasnt for dirrells holding.

guess the 2 cheap shots after the break and the 2 body slams don't count for anything