Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0

Poll: Who won?

Be advised that this is a public poll: other users can see the choice(s) you selected.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 220

Thread: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    CT Usa
    Posts
    8,846
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3165
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    I ain't a Froch fan but of course I root for him, I thought he deserved the win because Dirrell just ran from the fight and tried to STEAL rounds. Four or five decent trades in some rounds and he had it in the bag because he looked good when he did stand and fight.

    If anyone truly thinks he did enough to take the title they may need a new pair of eyes.
    Well direct me to the eye store

    Dirrell landed more punches

    Dirrell's punches were cleaner, sharper, crisp and accurate

    Dirrell was the better defender

    Dirrell had froch on rubber legs 2x compared 0 times

    Dirrell held and leaned a bit excessive.. Froch showed what a low class bush league cock he is with his fouling.. Desperate move by an absolute scrub of a fighter

    Froch did fuck all but plod around as usual, swing for the fences fanning off the front row cause he couldnt hit water if he fell out of a boat..

    Dirrell got fucked sideways and the idiots it the crowd were cheering when froch was swinging at the invisible man in the ring, cause Andre was nowere near when Carl the snail Froch loaded up.. He looked like an absolute bewildered clown, Mr confidence didnt look to sure of himself as he kneeled down with Dirrell in prayer, reminded me of how suprised Pac's face looked when the judges screwed JMM in their 2nd fight

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2548
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    I ain't a Froch fan but of course I root for him, I thought he deserved the win because Dirrell just ran from the fight and tried to STEAL rounds. Four or five decent trades in some rounds and he had it in the bag because he looked good when he did stand and fight.

    If anyone truly thinks he did enough to take the title they may need a new pair of eyes.
    Well direct me to the eye store

    Dirrell landed more punches

    Dirrell's punches were cleaner, sharper, crisp and accurate

    Dirrell was the better defender

    Dirrell had froch on rubber legs 2x compared 0 times

    Dirrell held and leaned a bit excessive.. Froch showed what a low class bush league cock he is with his fouling.. Desperate move by an absolute scrub of a fighter

    Froch did fuck all but plod around as usual, swing for the fences fanning off the front row cause he couldnt hit water if he fell out of a boat..

    Dirrell got fucked sideways and the idiots it the crowd were cheering when froch was swinging at the invisible man in the ring, cause Andre was nowere near when Carl the snail Froch loaded up.. He looked like an absolute bewildered clown, Mr confidence didnt look to sure of himself as he kneeled down with Dirrell in prayer, reminded me of how suprised Pac's face looked when the judges screwed JMM in their 2nd fight
    I replied to another blind man. Read that

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    877
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1146
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    I would like to know how anyone can say Froch won easily? Well, not even the bias judging had him win easily. With the one point deduction the two judges who "gave" it to Froch 115-112 had Froch winning by ONE swing round. That is as close as you can score a victory. Froch landed nothing. People who say Dirrell ran while Froch tried to stand in there and fight are just stating what any common boxing fan saw coming. Froch is a slugger and Dirrell is a pure boxer. Dirrell was not going to mix it up with Froch and Froch was not going to outbox Dirrell. Froch got outclassed made to look very slow and average. If Dirrell is "running" but landing when he throws even if its sparingly and Froch is just chasing, with no knowledge of how to cut the ring off, and landing absolutely no punches how does he win? Lets be realistic. How many punches did Froch land? If you still use your fingers then put your other hand down, its not needed. Heck, Dirrell even had Froch hurt and backed up at the end of 11th. I think its very fishy that there are no reported punchstats for this fight. I know people who wanted Froch to win will argue that you shouldn't be allowed to win if you're "running" then you definitely shouldn't be allowed to win if you're shadowboxing. This fight showed me things I already suspected. Dirrell was overwhelmed by the environment though he can win easily off atleticism which he did and Froch is really just an above average slow fighter with a lot of heart and conditioning who would've had no business being in the same ring with Calzaghe.
    Last edited by blegit; 10-18-2009 at 09:01 PM.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    South London Baby
    Posts
    5,330
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1717
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    I ain't a Froch fan but of course I root for him, I thought he deserved the win because Dirrell just ran from the fight and tried to STEAL rounds. Four or five decent trades in some rounds and he had it in the bag because he looked good when he did stand and fight.

    If anyone truly thinks he did enough to take the title they may need a new pair of eyes.
    Well direct me to the eye store

    Dirrell landed more punches

    Dirrell's punches were cleaner, sharper, crisp and accurate

    Dirrell was the better defender

    Dirrell had froch on rubber legs 2x compared 0 times

    Dirrell held and leaned a bit excessive.. Froch showed what a low class bush league cock he is with his fouling.. Desperate move by an absolute scrub of a fighter

    Froch did fuck all but plod around as usual, swing for the fences fanning off the front row cause he couldnt hit water if he fell out of a boat..

    Dirrell got fucked sideways and the idiots it the crowd were cheering when froch was swinging at the invisible man in the ring, cause Andre was nowere near when Carl the snail Froch loaded up.. He looked like an absolute bewildered clown, Mr confidence didnt look to sure of himself as he kneeled down with Dirrell in prayer, reminded me of how suprised Pac's face looked when the judges screwed JMM in their 2nd fight
    I don't think you can even compare the two. That was a fight in which both guys gave their all & even though I thought JMM won, I can't call a Pac win a robbery, there were a lot of close rounds because both guys were doing a lot.

    Froch-Dirrell had virtually no close rounds because one guy was doing very little & the other guy who got the win was doing absolutely FUCK ALL. I struggle to see this as even close. Massimo Barrovecchio & Daniel Van de Wiele will rank alongside Gale Van Hoye from now on in my judging shitlist.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    I ain't a Froch fan but of course I root for him, I thought he deserved the win because Dirrell just ran from the fight and tried to STEAL rounds. Four or five decent trades in some rounds and he had it in the bag because he looked good when he did stand and fight.

    If anyone truly thinks he did enough to take the title they may need a new pair of eyes.
    Well direct me to the eye store

    Dirrell landed more punches

    Dirrell's punches were cleaner, sharper, crisp and accurate

    Dirrell was the better defender

    Dirrell had froch on rubber legs 2x compared 0 times

    Dirrell held and leaned a bit excessive.. Froch showed what a low class bush league cock he is with his fouling.. Desperate move by an absolute scrub of a fighter

    Froch did fuck all but plod around as usual, swing for the fences fanning off the front row cause he couldnt hit water if he fell out of a boat..

    Dirrell got fucked sideways and the idiots it the crowd were cheering when froch was swinging at the invisible man in the ring, cause Andre was nowere near when Carl the snail Froch loaded up.. He looked like an absolute bewildered clown, Mr confidence didnt look to sure of himself as he kneeled down with Dirrell in prayer, reminded me of how suprised Pac's face looked when the judges screwed JMM in their 2nd fight
    Your right in everything you say. But Dirrell is not from the UK. So therefor he can not win. The fix was in from the beginning. It's how they roll in the UK and Europe. The home fighter wins no matter what.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2548
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    I ain't a Froch fan but of course I root for him, I thought he deserved the win because Dirrell just ran from the fight and tried to STEAL rounds. Four or five decent trades in some rounds and he had it in the bag because he looked good when he did stand and fight.

    If anyone truly thinks he did enough to take the title they may need a new pair of eyes.
    Well direct me to the eye store

    Dirrell landed more punches

    Dirrell's punches were cleaner, sharper, crisp and accurate

    Dirrell was the better defender

    Dirrell had froch on rubber legs 2x compared 0 times

    Dirrell held and leaned a bit excessive.. Froch showed what a low class bush league cock he is with his fouling.. Desperate move by an absolute scrub of a fighter

    Froch did fuck all but plod around as usual, swing for the fences fanning off the front row cause he couldnt hit water if he fell out of a boat..

    Dirrell got fucked sideways and the idiots it the crowd were cheering when froch was swinging at the invisible man in the ring, cause Andre was nowere near when Carl the snail Froch loaded up.. He looked like an absolute bewildered clown, Mr confidence didnt look to sure of himself as he kneeled down with Dirrell in prayer, reminded me of how suprised Pac's face looked when the judges screwed JMM in their 2nd fight
    Your right in everything you say. But Dirrell is not from the UK. So therefor he can not win. The fix was in from the beginning. It's how they roll in the UK and Europe. The home fighter wins no matter what.
    Maybe Dirrell should have knocked out Froch as he was so much better.

    Funny thread that's for sure.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by JT Rock View Post

    Well direct me to the eye store

    Dirrell landed more punches

    Dirrell's punches were cleaner, sharper, crisp and accurate

    Dirrell was the better defender

    Dirrell had froch on rubber legs 2x compared 0 times

    Dirrell held and leaned a bit excessive.. Froch showed what a low class bush league cock he is with his fouling.. Desperate move by an absolute scrub of a fighter

    Froch did fuck all but plod around as usual, swing for the fences fanning off the front row cause he couldnt hit water if he fell out of a boat..

    Dirrell got fucked sideways and the idiots it the crowd were cheering when froch was swinging at the invisible man in the ring, cause Andre was nowere near when Carl the snail Froch loaded up.. He looked like an absolute bewildered clown, Mr confidence didnt look to sure of himself as he kneeled down with Dirrell in prayer, reminded me of how suprised Pac's face looked when the judges screwed JMM in their 2nd fight
    Your right in everything you say. But Dirrell is not from the UK. So therefor he can not win. The fix was in from the beginning. It's how they roll in the UK and Europe. The home fighter wins no matter what.
    Maybe Dirrell should have knocked out Froch as he was so much better.

    Funny thread that's for sure.
    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2548
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    Your right in everything you say. But Dirrell is not from the UK. So therefor he can not win. The fix was in from the beginning. It's how they roll in the UK and Europe. The home fighter wins no matter what.
    Maybe Dirrell should have knocked out Froch as he was so much better.

    Funny thread that's for sure.
    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.
    What are the worst decisions you know of to come out of the the UK of late? (Not Europe like you say)

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Maybe Dirrell should have knocked out Froch as he was so much better.

    Funny thread that's for sure.
    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.
    What are the worst decisions you know of to come out of the the UK of late? (Not Europe like you say)
    What is the UK not part of Europe? I did say continent

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    5,351
    Mentioned
    116 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1206
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.
    What are the worst decisions you know of to come out of the the UK of late? (Not Europe like you say)
    What is the UK not part of Europe? I did say continent
    yep, its also part of the northern hemisphere. Thats how relevant it is.
    Saddo Fantasy Premier League
    2011/12 - 2nd
    2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
    2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)

    Saddo World Cup Dream Team
    2014 - 1st Hidden Content

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    2,805
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1415
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Froch-115-114 on my cards.

    “If you want loyalty, buy a dog.” Ricky Hatton





  12. #12
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    6,229
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2548
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.
    What are the worst decisions you know of to come out of the the UK of late? (Not Europe like you say)
    What is the UK not part of Europe? I did say continent
    Yes the UK is in Europe but you know damn well that you are trying to to say we are like Germany etc.. in terms of bullshit results. Not the case at all.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    5,351
    Mentioned
    116 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1206
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    Your right in everything you say. But Dirrell is not from the UK. So therefor he can not win. The fix was in from the beginning. It's how they roll in the UK and Europe. The home fighter wins no matter what.
    Maybe Dirrell should have knocked out Froch as he was so much better.

    Funny thread that's for sure.
    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.
    You are ridiculous. That just doesn't happen. Sure some european countries are quite bad (Germany, Italy for instance, Italy being the worst IMO) but i honestly don't feel the UK is any worse than anywhere else, and certainly not worse than good ol' YooS.A. You also make a fool of yourself by wrongly viewing Europe as a single entity. Its a diverse continent containing wildly different cultures, customs and ethics. The UK does not exactly have a history of 'corrupt' decisions, and in fact i challenge you to a name and shame. You name an incident of corrupt scoring in the UK and i will reply with an example from the US.

    Oh and just to clarify, i had Dirrell winning by two. But I have no real problem with the decision as he was supposed to be taking part in a boxing match, not strictly come dancing. Either way i think its creative to call the outcome corrupt.
    Saddo Fantasy Premier League
    2011/12 - 2nd
    2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
    2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)

    Saddo World Cup Dream Team
    2014 - 1st Hidden Content

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    18,672
    Mentioned
    40 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman89 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
    Maybe Dirrell should have knocked out Froch as he was so much better.

    Funny thread that's for sure.
    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.
    You are ridiculous. That just doesn't happen. Sure some european countries are quite bad (Germany, Italy for instance, Italy being the worst IMO) but i honestly don't feel the UK is any worse than anywhere else, and certainly not worse than good ol' YooS.A. You also make a fool of yourself by wrongly viewing Europe as a single entity. Its a diverse continent containing wildly different cultures, customs and ethics. The UK does not exactly have a history of 'corrupt' decisions, and in fact i challenge you to a name and shame. You name an incident of corrupt scoring in the UK and i will reply with an example from the US.

    Oh and just to clarify, i had Dirrell winning by two. But I have no real problem with the decision as he was supposed to be taking part in a boxing match, not strictly come dancing. Either way i think its creative to call the outcome corrupt.
    It's obvious your Boxing knowledge is very limited if you actually believe that. Go watch more Boxing and gain more knowledge. Maybe than you'll be worth debating with.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    5,351
    Mentioned
    116 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1206
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Who won? Froch? Or Dirrell?

    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by ryanman89 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Violent Demise View Post

    Like that would of mattered. Soon as Fraud would of hit the canvas the bell would of rang early and Fraud's corner would of rushed in to help him. Some how it would of been ruled a slip. I seen this shiit happen in Europe before. Don't make a fool of yourself by denying it hasn't. It's the most corrupt continent in the whole fukkin world.
    You are ridiculous. That just doesn't happen. Sure some european countries are quite bad (Germany, Italy for instance, Italy being the worst IMO) but i honestly don't feel the UK is any worse than anywhere else, and certainly not worse than good ol' YooS.A. You also make a fool of yourself by wrongly viewing Europe as a single entity. Its a diverse continent containing wildly different cultures, customs and ethics. The UK does not exactly have a history of 'corrupt' decisions, and in fact i challenge you to a name and shame. You name an incident of corrupt scoring in the UK and i will reply with an example from the US.

    Oh and just to clarify, i had Dirrell winning by two. But I have no real problem with the decision as he was supposed to be taking part in a boxing match, not strictly come dancing. Either way i think its creative to call the outcome corrupt.
    It's obvious your Boxing knowledge is very limited if you actually believe that. Go watch more Boxing and gain more knowledge. Maybe than you'll be worth debating with.
    Im thinking i've got more than enough already for someone on your level.
    Anyhow, i wasn't saying bad decisions don't happen. But your crazy example wouldn't happen in the UK. Or can you name one example when something remotely similar to that has happened in the UK?
    Saddo Fantasy Premier League
    2011/12 - 2nd
    2012/13 -1st Hidden Content
    2013/14 - 3rd (Master won)

    Saddo World Cup Dream Team
    2014 - 1st Hidden Content

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Froch Dirrell video
    By skel1983 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 10-17-2009, 05:35 AM
  2. Dirrell will destroy Froch!
    By gest12645 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-15-2009, 04:18 PM
  3. Froch vs Dirrell
    By Tysonbruno in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 38
    Last Post: 10-13-2009, 07:17 PM
  4. Anyone headin to Froch vs Dirrell
    By TheMacMagician in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 09-21-2009, 04:01 AM
  5. Dirrell vs Froch
    By RozzySean in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 12-11-2008, 04:48 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing