What Dirrel does that i hate.

[HattonTheHammer]

Did I say that? No, you made your usual poorly conceived comeback. I didn't like how Dirrell fought, but the fact is he was no greater a problem than Froch. Just because you are determined to forcefully ram your tongue up any British fighter's arse no matter what, try & actually read what the guy was saying.

He was talking about the basic fundamental skills you use in boxing, most importantly guarding the chin. You then use it as an excuse to go on about something completely different, because, let's face it, you like boxing to basically be a slightly classier version of the WWE.

Many others saw the irony of you complaining about holding being a Hatton fan, but I suppose that's ok because he used it to shove his head in his opponent's face & punch them illegally

Do you actually listen to yourself sometimes. Seriously read the original post then read what was just highlighted in red.

The guy was pointing out particulars of the fight that he did not like from andre dirrell. I replyed saying andre also wasnt my cup of tea..you completely throw the whole thing together...come up with 47 and then start talking about the "fundamentals of boxing"

The hatton remark wasnt lost on me. As i clearly pointed out hattons technique is a completely valid acceptable one while dirrells wild clambering of an opponent isnt.

If your gonna pick at a post at least get your facts right

jeez

:lolatyou:

Yes, the fundamentals of boxing, something Dirrell wasn't doing. That's what he was criticizing. I agree with him that sliding out move is an accident waiting to happen, he's already been dropped like that once in his career. He was talking about it as a technical issue, that's why he thought you were being sarcastic, because no one can possibly be that dumb.

You talking about facts is funny, it's like Russell Brand talking about abstinence. Seriously, from a boxing stand-point, nothing you said had anything to do with it. You & facts just don't go together. You & brash, baseless generalizations do go together.

You also clearly did not point out how Hatton has a clearly acceptable technique. Show me the post where you did that. Hatton wrestles, hits below the belt, tries every dirty trick in the book. You CANNOT dig your head into your opponent's face, it really is not legit.

JESUS H CHRIST

Have we met before?

Of the 3,000 odd posts ive made on this site im gonna go on record and say at least 700 of them have been about hatton, with a good 50/60 about his style and technique.

I was asked if i was being sarcastic because, and get this.............

he thought i was being "SARCASTIC"

Hatton does this, that etc - i really couldnt give a shit. 90% of fighters at the highest level bend rules as much as they possibly can to get the job done. If you can name me a single fighter in the history of the sport who has never "hit below the belt", "wrestled" "dug head into an opponents face" id just love to hear it.

Yes a lot of what i say on here about fighters i like can at times be biased. I completely agree i do defend my fave fighters (not just british ones) on here because i follow the sport with a passion. But when youve close contests such as this one you have to accept that 50% of the time your boy will miss out and put it down to bad luck rather than bitching about it.