What More could Dirrell Have done

[HattonTheHammer]

A- Not run around like a headless chicken for 12rounds
B- Stayed on his feet for more than 30 seconds
C- Stopped bitching to the ref everytime froch roughed him up
D- Actually engage in a boxing contest rather than fob everyone off for 12rounds and look to get a decision on points
E- Win more than the 4 clear rounds he only one
F- Actually win the fight which he clearly didnt!!

1st time i scored it........well i didnt i was too drunk
2nd time i had it 114-113 froch
3rd and 4th time viewing it i had it 115-112 froch on both occasions


dirrell lost, the better all round fighter won, stop bitching and look forward to seeing him take another beating once abraham gets hold of him!

[Pugilistic]

A- Not run around like a headless chicken for 12rounds
B- Stayed on his feet for more than 30 seconds
C- Stopped bitching to the ref everytime froch roughed him up
D- Actually engage in a boxing contest rather than fob everyone off for 12rounds and look to get a decision on points
E- Win more than the 4 clear rounds he only one
F- Actually win the fight which he clearly didnt!!

1st time i scored it........well i didnt i was too drunk
2nd time i had it 114-113 froch
3rd and 4th time viewing it i had it 115-112 froch on both occasions


dirrell lost, the better all round fighter won, stop bitching and look forward to seeing him take another beating once abraham gets hold of him!

Dirrell ran and clinched but still landed way more punches and matched Froch for workrate in majority of the rounds.

Running and holding doesn't cost you points unless the ref starts deducting points so Froch can't win the fight based on uneffectively coming forward and clinching less.

When scoring the fight on the 4 scoring criterias : Clean effective punching, effective aggression, ring generalship and defense, there is no doubt that Dirrell clearly won the fight.

I'm laughing my ass off at the bolded comment above also.