Re: Hopkins or Roy Jones!!!

Originally Posted by
Starr

Originally Posted by
miles

Originally Posted by
chamiley

Originally Posted by
Starr

Originally Posted by
freedomfighter2
Roy Jones was the most gifted fighter of this era sure and was a treat
to watch but needed a bigger heart
beating Tarver the first time took LOADS of heart

So did beating Hopkins with a broken right hand(which was broken before the fight happened) beating Telasco with a fractured wrist and NOT pulling out of the third tarver fight despite a broken right hand. These are the kind of things Joe Calzaghe pulls out of fights about

What does calzaghe have to do with the argument.
Exactly. I raised that argument too.
I'm saying that Roy has gone into fights with a broken hadn or a fractured wrist..which are the kinds of things Calzaghe pulls out of fights for

It's a testament to questioning Jones' heart
Even so, it took A LOT of heart for him to dig deep to beat Tarver the first time considering what he was up against.
It is just a case of how you perceive the sport. We see it as warriors fighting in battlefield so to pull out of a fight is seen as an act of cowardice. The Europeans see boxing for what it is, a sport. If you are not 100% going into a match then it is considered a dumb move risking your health. Peer Pressure is a bitch I believe Jones was pressured into taking the third fight with Tarver, clearly he wasn't in it to win the fight.
"Very few people really understand what it means to be a fighter. I hate it when I hear someone say, 'That fighter doesn't have guts. I hate that, I don't care if you're a world champion six times over or a four-round fighter, to step inside that ring, you have to have guts" Oscar De La Hoya
Bookmarks