Re: Haye-Valuev - Who wins? Fact.

Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales

Originally Posted by
Fenster

Originally Posted by
ElTerribleMorales
that has to do more with skill, fighting style, and mindset than it does size, you said it'd be cause he was too small, Holyfield is a fraction of an inch shorter, and he's one of the greatest recent heavies,so don't feed me that bull
And Haye is not. Haye is one of the best recent cruiserweights.
So should Haye lose to a man he is clearly light-years ahead in talent it will be because he is too small. Simple as.
don't know how the hell you figure it has anything to do with him being too small, if Haye ends up being a flop at HW it's cause he wasn't that good to begin with, nothing to do with him being too small, Holyfield ended up being as great as he was cause of his dedication, workrate, and his heart/warrior mentality, he had NO PHYSICAL ADVANTAGES over any of his opponents in terms of size, nutrition is a different story, but hey guess whatever you're smoking is pretty damn strong,
Err.. what? So you are saying if Haye doesn't reach the heights Evander Holyfield did at heavyweight it proves that Haye was never any good at boxing?
You do realise Holyfield was a bit special, right?
How many other cruiserweights have stepped up to heavyweight and matched Holyfields achievements?
3-Time SADDO PREDICTION COMP CHAMPION.
Bookmarks