Majority fans and analysts don't know S**T about boxing!!!

[Kev]

Your Quote " The majority of fans don't know shit about boxing " ?
Well let me start by saying , that personally I am going for a PACMAN win inside 6 rounds . But i like both fighters as they are exciting to watch , and I will be happy whoever wins.
As for opinions like mine " making you sick to your stomach" I find this laughable at best.
Not only should you take time away from masturbating furiously over pictures of the love of your life Cotto , myself and many other fine posters on Saddo's were watching boxing when your were a "GLINT IN THE MILKMAN'S EYE" . If by any chance you are not a prepubescent teen , then you are a mere idiot.
So to sum up your Highness , every one's opinions differ , that's what makes boxing great to watch and discuss.
More to the point thats what makes SADDO BOXING GREAT.
The prosecution rests.

No need to repeat myself , but as i said at the time you are an idiot.

First of all, this is a boxing forum so stick to boxing. Please share your thoughts on masturbation with your mother as I'm sure she would be more then happy to oblige.

Secondly, I will be the first to admit that my prediction was wrong and for the record, I'm also a Pac fan as well (read my other posts). It was the REASONING behind the odds is what didn't make sense to me. It seems everyone was basing the outcome of this fight on Pac's performance against Hatton and ODLH which is what I didn't understand. Those are not examples once should use to determine odds but regardless it was a great fight.

If only Cotto stuck to his jab and pick his spots like he did the first round but when he somewhat abandoned it and started to trade with Pac, he was in trouble.

The deciding factor in this fight was not only Pac's speed, but the unorthodox angle he throws his punches. What's amazing is there were times Cotto landed some flush punches but it didn't even phase Pac! I thought once Pac tastes Cotto power, he would be reluctant to trade but that was not the case at all which is what really perplexed me.

Regardless, this was a great for boxing fans! It's time to bring out Mayweather!

In the meantime Dark Lord Al, you can resume your erotic thoughts on breastfeeding as it appears your mother cut you off a tad to early...or to late.

So what you're saying is that the morons who know nothing about boxing got it right but for the wrong reasons, wheras although you got the result entirely wrong your reasons for doing so were correct?

[sanchez786]

No need to repeat myself , but as i said at the time you are an idiot.

First of all, this is a boxing forum so stick to boxing. Please share your thoughts on masturbation with your mother as I'm sure she would be more then happy to oblige.

Secondly, I will be the first to admit that my prediction was wrong and for the record, I'm also a Pac fan as well (read my other posts). It was the REASONING behind the odds is what didn't make sense to me. It seems everyone was basing the outcome of this fight on Pac's performance against Hatton and ODLH which is what I didn't understand. Those are not examples once should use to determine odds but regardless it was a great fight.

If only Cotto stuck to his jab and pick his spots like he did the first round but when he somewhat abandoned it and started to trade with Pac, he was in trouble.

The deciding factor in this fight was not only Pac's speed, but the unorthodox angle he throws his punches. What's amazing is there were times Cotto landed some flush punches but it didn't even phase Pac! I thought once Pac tastes Cotto power, he would be reluctant to trade but that was not the case at all which is what really perplexed me.

Regardless, this was a great for boxing fans! It's time to bring out Mayweather!

In the meantime Dark Lord Al, you can resume your erotic thoughts on breastfeeding as it appears your mother cut you off a tad to early...or to late.

So what you're saying is that the morons who know nothing about boxing got it right but for the wrong reasons, wheras although you got the result entirely wrong your reasons for doing so were correct?

I guess you could say that...I guess I'm not explaining myself in a manner that is easy to understand. For example, if you ask the general boxing public if Mike Tyson (the Tyson of now) was to fight Vitali , I woudn't be surprised that if the majority of the general pubic would think Tyson would KO Vitali in the 1st round.

This is why I like this forum...posters on this site are actually well educated in the boxing world. The 50/50 split of posters believing either Pac/Cotto win is proof of that where as if you go on any off topic/random sports forum, Pac was an 90% favorite simply because of the fact that he beat an over the hill/weight drained ODLH and overrated Ricky Hatton. Majority of them probably don't know much about Cotto and his victories over fast fighters like Mosley and Judah.

At any rate, it's moot point. Congrats to Pac for a job well done! As far as Cotto is concerned and his comments about still wanting to fight...I think his next fight will be with Hatton.

[skel1983]

First of all, this is a boxing forum so stick to boxing. Please share your thoughts on masturbation with your mother as I'm sure she would be more then happy to oblige.

Secondly, I will be the first to admit that my prediction was wrong and for the record, I'm also a Pac fan as well (read my other posts). It was the REASONING behind the odds is what didn't make sense to me. It seems everyone was basing the outcome of this fight on Pac's performance against Hatton and ODLH which is what I didn't understand. Those are not examples once should use to determine odds but regardless it was a great fight.

If only Cotto stuck to his jab and pick his spots like he did the first round but when he somewhat abandoned it and started to trade with Pac, he was in trouble.

The deciding factor in this fight was not only Pac's speed, but the unorthodox angle he throws his punches. What's amazing is there were times Cotto landed some flush punches but it didn't even phase Pac! I thought once Pac tastes Cotto power, he would be reluctant to trade but that was not the case at all which is what really perplexed me.

Regardless, this was a great for boxing fans! It's time to bring out Mayweather!

In the meantime Dark Lord Al, you can resume your erotic thoughts on breastfeeding as it appears your mother cut you off a tad to early...or to late.

So what you're saying is that the morons who know nothing about boxing got it right but for the wrong reasons, wheras although you got the result entirely wrong your reasons for doing so were correct?

I guess you could say that...I guess I'm not explaining myself in a manner that is easy to understand. For example, if you ask the general boxing public if Mike Tyson (the Tyson of now) was to fight Vitali , I woudn't be surprised that if the majority of the general pubic would think Tyson would KO Vitali in the 1st round.

This is why I like this forum...posters on this site are actually well educated in the boxing world. The 50/50 split of posters believing either Pac/Cotto win is proof of that where as if you go on any off topic/random sports forum, Pac was an 90% favorite simply because of the fact that he beat an over the hill/weight drained ODLH and overrated Ricky Hatton. Majority of them probably don't know much about Cotto and his victories over fast fighters like Mosley and Judah.

At any rate, it's moot point. Congrats to Pac for a job well done! As far as Cotto is concerned and his comments about still wanting to fight...I think his next fight will be with Hatton.

Its a shame the educated people couldnt pass anything onto you.