Well i'm back from my hiatus....

[Andre]

If its between the two of you, do it via pm's.

[happytrip]

If its between the two of you, do it via pm's.

He abused my humbleness on this board,im just countering.With due respect ,this is my last post about this matter.

[ElTerribleMorales]

Hey dude ...all your anti pacquiao posts were all proven wrong last saturday.Pacquiao hittable?hahaha,he is hittable cos you saw it in the first and second rounds?If you know boxing as you claimed you could have not said Pac is hittable.

I thought you are a real boxing fan?Why cant you recognized that Pac allowed himself to be hit to measure Cotto's power in the first and second rounds.It was so glaring,that Coach FREDDIE even scowled at PAC "Why are you fighting his fight"?

You congratulated Pacquiao but you still have the nerve to post that he is hittable.Yes he got hit in the later rounds but Cotto's power are all diminished at that time.Pacquiao was free whelling on him and going for a stoppage already.beggining the 3rd round IMO,Cotto is ready to go down.He saved himself only by running away.BTW was i right on saying that cotto's face will look like crumpled spam meat SHOULD HE NOT GIVE UP?

You declared here im just a pachugger posting PAC FANTASIES.Then why is it that my post were seem describing the pac vs. cotto fight.And what happened last saturday were what i was posting two days before the fight.Remember i said i give Cotto a chance to win only in the first two rounds.

On the other hand all your posts were nothing but flowering trying hard to be an expert .YOU SOUND AUTHORITATIVE THAT TIME.your clottey,torres,analysis were all false and amatuerist compared to mine.You were not even convinced that COTTO IS SOFT.

And what else?...now whose the boxing IGNORANT between the two of us?

You want us debate on PAC vs. MAYWEATHER?...am sure i will scrub you on the floor once more on this topic..hahahalolz

you saying that Cotto is soft basically diminishes anything Pacquiao accomplished, you want people to appreciate him, yet you yourself say Cotto is weak, so what's the big deal of the win then? cause according to you he beat a weak, "soft", average Cotto, learn to take a compliment and sorry Manny was very hittable from round 1 to about round 9 (when Miguel basically stopped throwing), Cotto was effective when he would use his jab but like DLH against Mayweather he just stopped using it, combined with an ignorant corner, he was extremely ill prepared for the fight, but, there's no one to blame but himself, Pacquiao's main two advantages were speed and his ability to keep composed for MOST of the fight, but he was easily tagged, if anything he showed he had a good chin, and not so much that Cotto is a weak hitter, Mayweather has hands just as fast as Pacquiao, and IMO has faster reflexes, i said it time and time again that both Manny and Cotto would lose to Floyd and a stand by that claim

Well dude,i didnt say that Pac should not be appreciated cos Cotto is soft,because cotto is indeed soft as i implied to you when you were shouting that cotto will pummel PACQUIAO.you insists cOTTO is bigger and stronger...i replied to all your tantrums that should PAC survive the first two rounds with COTTO,he will win whether it is ko,tko,or decision.

That was the subject of our argument and the result is.....you ate your whole shit in that thread.Dont make any diversionary tactic blah blah blah.Focus on your tirades on me that were zapped by a brutal convincing win by PACQUIAO.

you have the balls,be man enough to admit that i scrubbed you on the floor this time around.lolz

Again your shouting about a Mayweather win vs.Pacquiao.hahaha you even imply pacquiao is still in the level of cotto after that sarurday thrashing...

It is glaring you are a pachater,needless to say a ra--st!

I dont buy your greeting of z gorrez as sincere,cos i smell burning plastic on it.

Well ,much as i can avoid,this no brainer pachugger doesnt want to scrub you on the floor once again on a debate re pac vs. pbf.Youre just not in the same level anymore.

Goodbye boxing fan.

are you seriously that stupid? umm you saying Cotto is "soft" or weak, basically turns Manny's win into nothing, he proved jack shit according to you, cause if he beat up a weak Cotto as you yourself have said, why should he be praised for doing the same thing he did against DLH? do i think Cotto was "soft"? NO, that's why i'm praising and giving PACQUIAO (not your retarded ass) all the credit in the world, you didn't prove a thing but show that you still know jack shit about boxing, you picked the favorite and your outcome was completely wrong, you said that Pacquiao was untouchable Cotto landed on him plenty, and was having success early on when he used his jab, but he chose to prove he was the stronger guy and it went downhill from there, you didn't do jack shit seeing how you didn't play any part in his win you friggin psycho

If its between the two of you, do it via pm's.

He abused my humbleness on this board,im just countering.With due respect ,this is my last post about this matter.

then go to a battered womans forum and cry there you pansy

[happytrip]

you saying that Cotto is soft basically diminishes anything Pacquiao accomplished, you want people to appreciate him, yet you yourself say Cotto is weak, so what's the big deal of the win then? cause according to you he beat a weak, "soft", average Cotto, learn to take a compliment and sorry Manny was very hittable from round 1 to about round 9 (when Miguel basically stopped throwing), Cotto was effective when he would use his jab but like DLH against Mayweather he just stopped using it, combined with an ignorant corner, he was extremely ill prepared for the fight, but, there's no one to blame but himself, Pacquiao's main two advantages were speed and his ability to keep composed for MOST of the fight, but he was easily tagged, if anything he showed he had a good chin, and not so much that Cotto is a weak hitter, Mayweather has hands just as fast as Pacquiao, and IMO has faster reflexes, i said it time and time again that both Manny and Cotto would lose to Floyd and a stand by that claim

Well dude,i didnt say that Pac should not be appreciated cos Cotto is soft,because cotto is indeed soft as i implied to you when you were shouting that cotto will pummel PACQUIAO.you insists cOTTO is bigger and stronger...i replied to all your tantrums that should PAC survive the first two rounds with COTTO,he will win whether it is ko,tko,or decision.

That was the subject of our argument and the result is.....you ate your whole shit in that thread.Dont make any diversionary tactic blah blah blah.Focus on your tirades on me that were zapped by a brutal convincing win by PACQUIAO.

you have the balls,be man enough to admit that i scrubbed you on the floor this time around.lolz

Again your shouting about a Mayweather win vs.Pacquiao.hahaha you even imply pacquiao is still in the level of cotto after that sarurday thrashing...

It is glaring you are a pachater,needless to say a ra--st!

I dont buy your greeting of z gorrez as sincere,cos i smell burning plastic on it.

Well ,much as i can avoid,this no brainer pachugger doesnt want to scrub you on the floor once again on a debate re pac vs. pbf.Youre just not in the same level anymore.

Goodbye boxing fan.

are you seriously that stupid? umm you saying Cotto is "soft" or weak, basically turns Manny's win into nothing, he proved jack shit according to you, cause if he beat up a weak Cotto as you yourself have said, why should he be praised for doing the same thing he did against DLH? do i think Cotto was "soft"? NO, that's why i'm praising and giving PACQUIAO (not your retarded ass) all the credit in the world, you didn't prove a thing but show that you still know jack shit about boxing, you picked the favorite and your outcome was completely wrong, you said that Pacquiao was untouchable Cotto landed on him plenty, and was having success early on when he used his jab, but he chose to prove he was the stronger guy and it went downhill from there, you didn't do jack shit seeing how you didn't play any part in his win you friggin psycho

If its between the two of you, do it via pm's.

He abused my humbleness on this board,im just countering.With due respect ,this is my last post about this matter.

then go to a battered womans forum and cry there you pansy

Should be my last post above but i have to reply to this terrible hambugero....sorry mod Andre ;have to take back my promise.

@El terriblemorales;you sure got a thick face and hard head.You got no sense,you use diversionary tactics.you got owned and still you posts here as if your all knowing.If you enjoy being this way....then go on,to me you are nothing but a CLOWN.

[ElTerribleMorales]

Well dude,i didnt say that Pac should not be appreciated cos Cotto is soft,because cotto is indeed soft as i implied to you when you were shouting that cotto will pummel PACQUIAO.you insists cOTTO is bigger and stronger...i replied to all your tantrums that should PAC survive the first two rounds with COTTO,he will win whether it is ko,tko,or decision.

That was the subject of our argument and the result is.....you ate your whole shit in that thread.Dont make any diversionary tactic blah blah blah.Focus on your tirades on me that were zapped by a brutal convincing win by PACQUIAO.

you have the balls,be man enough to admit that i scrubbed you on the floor this time around.lolz

Again your shouting about a Mayweather win vs.Pacquiao.hahaha you even imply pacquiao is still in the level of cotto after that sarurday thrashing...

It is glaring you are a pachater,needless to say a ra--st!

I dont buy your greeting of z gorrez as sincere,cos i smell burning plastic on it.

Well ,much as i can avoid,this no brainer pachugger doesnt want to scrub you on the floor once again on a debate re pac vs. pbf.Youre just not in the same level anymore.

Goodbye boxing fan.

are you seriously that stupid? umm you saying Cotto is "soft" or weak, basically turns Manny's win into nothing, he proved jack shit according to you, cause if he beat up a weak Cotto as you yourself have said, why should he be praised for doing the same thing he did against DLH? do i think Cotto was "soft"? NO, that's why i'm praising and giving PACQUIAO (not your retarded ass) all the credit in the world, you didn't prove a thing but show that you still know jack shit about boxing, you picked the favorite and your outcome was completely wrong, you said that Pacquiao was untouchable Cotto landed on him plenty, and was having success early on when he used his jab, but he chose to prove he was the stronger guy and it went downhill from there, you didn't do jack shit seeing how you didn't play any part in his win you friggin psycho

He abused my humbleness on this board,im just countering.With due respect ,this is my last post about this matter.

then go to a battered womans forum and cry there you pansy

Should be my last post above but i have to reply to this terrible hambugero....sorry mod Andre ;have to take back my promise.

@El terriblemorales;you sure got a thick face and hard head.You got no sense,you use diversionary tactics.you got owned and still you posts here as if your all knowing.If you enjoy being this way....then go on,to me you are nothing but a CLOWN.

cry me a river, and wtf is a thick face? lol funny how more people have agreed with me overall isn't it, and another funny little side note, i haven't had to go and make multiple accounts now have i buddy, unlike some Xadu over there

[kingfrnk]

happytrip, take your pactard fanboy ass on somewhere