What ring size you favor for Floyd-Pacquiao fight?

[fanjohn]

20 x 20 = compromise = no one can bitch about either fighter having an inherent advantage based purely on ring size.

Ring size won't give an advantage to either boxer but I think smaller ring can help create more action in the fight which is better for the paying fans.

[Kel]

20 x 20 = compromise = no one can bitch about either fighter having an inherent advantage based purely on ring size.

Ring size won't give an advantage to either boxer but I think smaller ring can help create more action in the fight which is better for the paying fans.

Why make the fucking poll then if you think that? Why should we all nominate a ring size if it don't mean shit?

[fanjohn]

20 x 20 = compromise = no one can bitch about either fighter having an inherent advantage based purely on ring size.

Ring size won't give an advantage to either boxer but I think smaller ring can help create more action in the fight which is better for the paying fans.

Why make the fucking poll then if you think that? Why should we all nominate a ring size if it don't mean shit?

OK so what's your take about the ring size? Does a particular ring size would favor one boxer? Please enlightened us with your opinion on this matter.

[killersheep]

I agree that given the tools both fighters have the size of the ring doesn't matter a whole lot, although a smaller ring would give PAC a slight advantage and conversely a larger ring would give PBF a slight advantage. I think 16' x 16' rings should be standardized for all weight classes 154 and below and 20' x 20' rings for Middleweight and above. There really is no reason for a ring bigger than that.

[Fenster]

A square one helps.

[killersheep]

A square one helps.

I was actually thinking a 5' x 30' one would make it interesting.

[Fenster]

A square one helps.

I was actually thinking a 5' x 30' one would make it interesting.

Yes...

How about they try an octagon?

[Zilla]

A square one helps.

I was actually thinking a 5' x 30' one would make it interesting.

So like a roped hall then?

[Gandalf]

A square one helps.

Shouldn't a ring be circular?

[CFH]

Fuck it, I'm moving this thread to spam.

[fanjohn]

I agree that given the tools both fighters have the size of the ring doesn't matter a whole lot, although a smaller ring would give PAC a slight advantage and conversely a larger ring would give PBF a slight advantage. I think 16' x 16' rings should be standardized for all weight classes 154 and below and 20' x 20' rings for Middleweight and above. There really is no reason for a ring bigger than that.

Well said mate. These 2 are the best boxers in our generation and ring size won't matter much for these 2 boxers. But I favor a smaller ring thinking it will generate more engagement and actions.