What ring size you favor for Floyd-Pacquiao fight?

[killersheep]

I agree that given the tools both fighters have the size of the ring doesn't matter a whole lot, although a smaller ring would give PAC a slight advantage and conversely a larger ring would give PBF a slight advantage. I think 16' x 16' rings should be standardized for all weight classes 154 and below and 20' x 20' rings for Middleweight and above. There really is no reason for a ring bigger than that.

[Fenster]

A square one helps.

[killersheep]

A square one helps.

I was actually thinking a 5' x 30' one would make it interesting.

[Fenster]

A square one helps.

I was actually thinking a 5' x 30' one would make it interesting.

Yes...

How about they try an octagon?

[killersheep]

A square one helps.

I was actually thinking a 5' x 30' one would make it interesting.

Yes...

How about they try an octagon?

Or could just keep it real

[Nameless]

The bigger the ring is, the biggest are the chances that Mayweather might perform another classical volume of dancing with the stars. I would go with 20 x 20 as it sounds fair for everybody, being in the middle of what would advantage too much Pacman or Mayweather. a 16x16 would surely help to stir up action and excitement but I think 20x20 is the most honest compromise.

[OumaFan]

Worst thread ever? Maybe.

[Zilla]

A square one helps.

I was actually thinking a 5' x 30' one would make it interesting.

So like a roped hall then?

[southpaw85]

The smaller the better as far as im concerned, give manny more opportunity to smack the crap out of the much quicker floyd.

[Gandalf]

A square one helps.

Shouldn't a ring be circular?

[CFH]

Fuck it, I'm moving this thread to spam.

[kingfrnk]

yep one of the worst threads ever. maybe cause it was started by one of the worse pactards ever

[fanjohn]

I agree that given the tools both fighters have the size of the ring doesn't matter a whole lot, although a smaller ring would give PAC a slight advantage and conversely a larger ring would give PBF a slight advantage. I think 16' x 16' rings should be standardized for all weight classes 154 and below and 20' x 20' rings for Middleweight and above. There really is no reason for a ring bigger than that.

Well said mate. These 2 are the best boxers in our generation and ring size won't matter much for these 2 boxers. But I favor a smaller ring thinking it will generate more engagement and actions.