Quote Originally Posted by Kel View Post
Quote Originally Posted by fanjohn View Post
Quote Originally Posted by SRR View Post
20 x 20 = compromise = no one can bitch about either fighter having an inherent advantage based purely on ring size.
Ring size won't give an advantage to either boxer but I think smaller ring can help create more action in the fight which is better for the paying fans.
Why make the fucking poll then if you think that? Why should we all nominate a ring size if it don't mean shit?
OK so what's your take about the ring size? Does a particular ring size would favor one boxer? Please enlightened us with your opinion on this matter.