i'm talking prime wright. i've seen ppl elsewhere compare these two.
i think wright was a LOT better.
i'm talking prime wright. i've seen ppl elsewhere compare these two.
i think wright was a LOT better.
winky defo..
i think in his prime at LMW he was damm near unbeatable..
dont Fuck with the chuck
Abraham is probably a bit bigger, and may not yet have reached his peak yet. It'll be easier to make a judgement after the super six is finished. As of now Wright has the better resume but he may not have by the time AA is finished.
abraham's in his prime right now.
alright. i don't see him beating kessler. and i don't think any of the guys at 168 right now are as good as vargas who wright beat.
Too early to say
Winky beat better fighters than AA has ever been in with, once abraham has been in with that level of opponent i`ll be able to make an accurate assesment!
one dangerous horrible bloke
I think Wright was a much better all around fighter,truer defensively and for the absolute longest very under appreciated.Abraham still has some time,can very well bank career peak on super 6 result.Its been hacked to death...but still had Wright besting Vargas myself.
As of now Winky for sure.
one dangerous horrible bloke
It's impossible to say until both finish their careers (though Winky is just about done).
Right now it's Wright by a wide margin.
I don't really like Arthur Abraham's fighting style, he's basically defensive for 2:30 minutes of a round. Then he explodes with wild punches, im not saying he isn't good or tough. But come on Winky Wright is way better, his defense is better, simply because he could be active and still defend great.
He could be a great boxer with movement, which he showed in his early career. He has a great jab something Arthur Abraham is missing, plus Winky Wright punches with much better technique, his punches at times seemed liked lazers. Arthur Abraham would of got totally outboxed by Winky Wright.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks