Quote Originally Posted by hattonthehammer View Post
exactly

I was a naive voter like many who heard a lot of people finally bringing this subject to our attention and chose to vote them on the basis of the issue that troubled me the most.

I admit i ballsed that up, having actually looked into their policys they are indeed a vile hate mob who want a racially pure nation. But the point i keep trying to explain to merkin is that while they may be neo-nazi thugs the large majority of people that vote for them arent. He wont have that, 8% of the british public are vile racist scum!

Yes i probably am a bit of a homophobe i`ll hold my hands up there, but merkin clearly has issues with "the man" and chooses to voice those on here
I've never assumed everyone who voted for them was a racist, but when I tried to address this to you at the time, you accused me of having an agenda because I didn't vote how you thought I should

You talk about me throwing mud, but you dived into that mud & rolled around in it. You'll find I've very rarely called you out in a thread in the way you've been doing recently & then you're surprised that I respond.

Saying Floyd Mayweather is 'a typical African-American cocky cunt who needs a slap' is racist, regardless of you using the most politically correct language to say it. I tried to discuss this with you seriously on the other thread & either your reading skills or general ambivalence towards any serious discussion led you to ignore it. You've got the freedom to say what you like about people, I have no problem with that, but you can't then complain about me calling you out on it if I disagree with it.

You say I have problems with 'the man', well I've almost certainly worked far more closely with 'the man' than you have so that's a bit of a non-starter. I know it's easy for you to assume I have a chip on my shoulder, but I have no problem with a single other poster's comments on this site & have attacked the dickheads who accuse Missy & Miles of it, just because they hate Khan. It is just yours. Just think about some of the stuff you say & ask yourself if you would really say the same things (most rapes being committed by blacks) in a room full of black people. If you can honestly say you would, then I take it back you're not a racist.

Also if you're going to go on a windup, you might want to do it on a thread where I'm disagreeing with you

Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing
It's alright saying no system should allow corruption but every system does. A constitutional monarchy is the least worst system available, QED.

And again, there's no excess of money going to anyody, there's a massive net saving with a monarchy. Arguing against the monarchy on cost grounds compared to other systems guarantees you lose the argument.

Eventually in a decade or three our system of government will be superseded by a Euro government in which the head of state takes Euro-size bribes and costs us even more so there'll be no saving at all by having a monarch, but the British people will still cling to the monarchy, even more when we're governed by Europe and are looking to preserve national identity as much as possible. London may be very liberal and republican but if you go to the provinces you'll find incredibly strong support for the crown and that's before we end up run by Europe. A sure way to end up in Accident and Emergency is to go into a pub in Sunderland and start badmouthing the Queen.
I've just picked this one out, but I agree with most of Kirkland's points on here. Even if I don't love the monarchy, they do much more good for our country than bad. In addition, the Prince's Trust is one of the single best charitable organisations in this country, particularly for helping young people from disadvantaged backgrounds make something of themselves. Whilst some say they perpetuate the class system, they do more than they need to in trying to help some of the most unfortunate break down the barriers of that system.