Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Kirkland Laing View Post
Nobody is saying Bush is as bad as Hitler, but you can be less bad than Hitler and still be a war criminal.
...actually you can be worse and still not be a war criminal.

Kirkland you can wish for Bush and Blair to be tried as war criminals in one hand and crap in the other and see which one gets filled first.

Do you people deny the slightest possibility that #1 Some of those "civilian casualties" were actually enemy combatants? or that #2 Perhaps the Allied Forces didn't kill those civilians but the enemy combatants did or that #3 MAYBE the enemy combatants hid themselves around civilians not only to try and blend in but to bait the Allies to attack in turn insighting hatred of the Allied forces by the very civilians they (the enemy) endanger? Are those not plausable reasons behind any if not ALL of the civilians casualties

And Kirkland don't you or anyone else fucking quote the Geneva Convention to anyone the terrorists don't wear uniforms, attack ANYONE civilians/reporters/medical personell, and they cut people's heads off when they have them held captive....but I suppose pouring water on someone who was part of 9/11 just makes us even.
You can start more wars than Hitler and not be a war criminal?

Forget about civilian casualties. Let's just talk about planning an illegal war. That's an unambiguous war crime and it's clear that B and B did lots of planning before they started the war. So they're war criminals, no?

And Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11 or any terrorist attack on America, don't change the subject to Saddam's nonexistent support of Al Quaeda. The reason I'm mentioning the Geneva Conventions is that America and Britain both signed up to them and B and B both clearly broke the laws enshrined in those conventions.