Quote Originally Posted by Lyle View Post
Quote Originally Posted by p4pking View Post
Yea it's an odd one.. You can say Wlad is better for every reason under the sun, but the fact remains he's never going to beat anybody Vitali couldn't, or hasn't done so anyways, and he's always going to be more vulnerable.
Chris Byrd....boom your theory is prooven false


Wladimir has ALWAYS been the better BOXER he's technically sound, he's got a great jab, one of the best left hooks in the division and a killer right cross. Wlad COULD get KO'd but he's never in danger of being outboxed.

Vitali is awkward, he gets more KO's but I've noticed since his comeback he has not sat down on his punches and therefore I think you take away Vitali's scary power and just give him above average power then it makes him more vulnerable as the years go on.
Wladimir Klitschko maybe better technically, but if you had a time machine. And you could only pick one brother to fight some of the ATG Heavyweight's which one would you choose ?

Because i know what one i would choose Vitali Klitschko, atleast i could count on his toughness. Skill is only a part of boxing Lyle and yes Wladimir Klitschko is more skilled.

But Vitali Klitschko is mentally tougher, and physically he's tougher. And he's still pretty skilled himself with good power to boot.

I think Vitali Klitschko was beating Chris Byrd clearly, although Chris Byrd was coming on. But then put it this way Lyle, could Wladimir Klitschko have beaten Corrie Sanders ? could he have been competitive with Lennox Lewis ?