Mike Tyson. Underrated or Overrated?

[generalbulldog]

Seems like there are 2 camps when it comes to evaluating Mike Tyson, the ones who thought he was overrated and the ones who thought he was underrated.

When your biggest wins are against an 38 year old Holmes, an blown up LHW in Spinks (who beat an 36 year old Holmes and got a gift decision in the 2nd fight), weak contenders/paper champions like Seldon, Bruno, Biggs, Williams, Marvis Frazier, Berbick, then that's a pretty weak resume. He looked spectacular fighting weak contenders and knocking them out.

And 1 funny thing, Mike Tyson fans claim Mike was in his prime in the late 80s, it's really funny that Mike was past his prime when Buster Douglass beats him in 1990. I keep hearing that.

So can anyone tell me how can a 23 year old undefeated, supposedly invincible HW champion without that much wear and tear be past his prime in the Douglas fight?

Yeah he was exciting knocking out tomato cans, bums, old ass Larry Holmes, blown up LHW in Spinks, etc. But put me in the overrated camp.

And no way does he even beat an Ali if both were in their prime. I keep hearing that. Ali would just have made fun of his voice and then proceed to give him a beating in the ring.

[Gandalf]

Tyson was a bit of both.

For the period when he good, he was very good. The Douglas loss was not about being beyond his prime, but if you don't train for a fight then what can you do. He came back pretty well with Ruddock both times, but it was 3 years in jail that really ended Tyson.

For that brief period I really think that he was a match for any heavyweight in the history of the sport. He had great skills in terms of movement, output and he would be there until you were stopped or outworked.

Tyson these days is possibly somewhat underrated.

[DaxxKahn]

They overall in ring package of Tyson is definitely underrated when he is spoke about today but during his reign he was greatly over rated mainly due to the fact he had such weak competition during his prime era of the mid to late 1980's.

As a fighter though Mike really had it all, a good chin, great speed and punching technique, defense and heart. When put into a package Mike was a phenom....

I think so much fear was put into his opp back then because no one had actually seen a fighter like him.

Sadly enough in his later years the personal decline and the fact he really lost interest in the sport and boxed more so for money and fact he knew nothing else to do causing shoddy performances and losses to men that in his prime he would have eaten alive inside of 6 rounds to be generous....

If he could have stayed on track a few years longer and out of prison we would have witnessed the true Tyson and what he was really made of because he could have taken part in fights with Bowe and Holyfield when he was at his best..

We would have been able to gage his true over all status more accurately

[yvonne]

They overall in ring package of Tyson is definitely underrated when he is spoke about today but during his reign he was greatly over rated mainly due to the fact he had such weak competition during his prime era of the mid to late 1980's.

As a fighter though Mike really had it all, a good chin, great speed and punching technique, defense and heart. When put into a package Mike was a phenom....

I think so much fear was put into his opp back then because no one had actually seen a fighter like him.

Sadly enough in his later years the personal decline and the fact he really lost interest in the sport and boxed more so for money and fact he knew nothing else to do causing shoddy performances and losses to men that in his prime he would have eaten alive inside of 6 rounds to be generous....

If he could have stayed on track a few years longer and out of prison we would have witnessed the true Tyson and what he was really made of because he could have taken part in fights with Bowe and Holyfield when he was at his best..

We would have been able to gage his true over all status more accurately

Really good realistic point there mate,if he did'nt get too involved with bad situations and kept on the straight and narrow,or if Cus was still alive when he broke onto the professional ranks he would have been unstoppable.There's no doubt Tyson had the whole package in the Heavyweight division,okay we know he did'nt have height,but what he lacked in height he gained in speed and raw power.Tyson was really exciting and dangerous to any heavyweight.Imgaine Tyson in his prime on the scen of the Heavy weights this present day and age??He would just stream role the lot of them.Tyson is a boxer we all loved watching weather you liked him or not you still watched him due to the unexpected of his nature inside and outside of the ring.Tyson was awseome,the way he just smash his opponants with no care and justice was just awesome,pure animal!!!

[Lance Uppercut]

He is generally over rated by younger or new fans.

Although Tyson is tough to rate. He absolutely destroyed mediocre opposition.

There is sort of the same problem with Rocky Marciano- being dominant in a weak era.

The only difference between Rocky and Tyson are that Tyson kept fighting after his decline, where as Rocky quit before it.

Imagine if Tyson retired in 1989 at 37-0

[jon09]

There is always the woulda coulda shoulda thing with Tyson, Cus this and Kevin Rooney that to prison to wrong people in his life blah blah blah. Every fighter has those instances to Bowe and his diet to to Ali and his exile etc. Every person in Saddo has those same scenarios in their life that coulda defined them but they took different paths. Bottom line; I think he was a good heavyweight champion, but not great. He had intimidation going for him just like certain fighters of today have before they get beat, Sam Peter comes to mind and when they find opponents that can overcome that aura and fight back this is when it matters most and Tyson never showed that he had what it took to dig deep for greatness but he sure new how to sell it like he did.

[Chrislfc17]

It's a difficult one to call regarding Mike Tyson. There's no doubt that those first 5 years where impressive. I don't think I've ever seen a HW fight with the aggression and ferocity that Mike did. I always feel that longevity plays a big part when looking back on someone's career though and sadly, for whatever reasons, be it the death of Cus, Don King, or maybe just Mike not being able to handle all the attention and pressure that comes with being the youngest HW ever, he derailed.

Personally I would put Lewis ahead of Tyson in the all time greats purely for his longevity. Tyson just pushed the self destruction button and he pushed it fairly early into his career. For me its a question of what might have been. Once he lost that aura of invincibility he just became another HW.

[Master]

Mike Tyson is just glad to be rated with the greats. In the short space of time he achieved a lot, unified title, youngest champ and biggest fighter since Ali.

[Cressa121]

Its difficult to say really. I'm a huge Tyson fan, but he tends to be overrated somewhat. I disagree with those that say he was past his prime when he lost to Douglas, he didn't take the fight seriously and barely trained for it. I think he would steam through any of today's heavyweights when he was at his best, because although his opposition wasn't the strongest, he was the closest i've seen to an invincible fighter, it just didn't seemlike it was possible to beat him to me. In terms of achievement i wouldn't say he's one of the best ever, but he was an animal in those early years.

[Zilla]

I don't think Mike is really either. He was what we were looking at. It wasn't his fault that he came to prominence when the rest of the division was weak. Who can you say he ducked? Who can you say he was afraid of? The Holyfield fight was a done deal if it hadn't been for Mike getting into that car accident and then going to prison. He wasn't past his physical prime when he fought Douglas, but he was past his mental prime. He stopped doing the things he needed to do to be ready for fights. He surrounded himself with the wrong people. He trusted the wrong people. Had he been able to maintain focus then he would have fought the Holyfields, Lewises and Bowes of the division. Or at least, it wouldn't have been because of any lacking on his part that those fights didn't materialize.

I'm a huge Tyson fan, but I'm not in that camp that would claim Mike could beat anyone. I doubt Mike could have beaten Ali because guys who played keepaway gave him trouble. Mike did the best against guys who didn't move around a lot and Ali would have had him jogging to keep up. I do think he would have killed Joe Frazier, though.

[alanworthy]

when tyson was on his role he was rated number 1 in the world at his weight. what more can i say he was a world champ and ranked number 1.

[DaxxKahn]

Its difficult to say really. I'm a huge Tyson fan, but he tends to be overrated somewhat. I disagree with those that say he was past his prime when he lost to Douglas, he didn't take the fight seriously and barely trained for it. I think he would steam through any of today's heavyweights when he was at his best, because although his opposition wasn't the strongest, he was the closest i've seen to an invincible fighter, it just didn't seemlike it was possible to beat him to me. In terms of achievement i wouldn't say he's one of the best ever, but he was an animal in those early years.

I agree totally about the Douglas comments

Mike was not past his prime when he fought Douglas he was under trained over confident and believed in his power too much to think Douglas had a remote chance at beating him....Foolishness cost him...

Kind of Like Lennox Lewis losing to Rahman...he took Rahman the same as Tyson took Douglas and it cost him

[DaxxKahn]

He is generally over rated by younger or new fans.

Although Tyson is tough to rate. He absolutely destroyed mediocre opposition.

There is sort of the same problem with Rocky Marciano- being dominant in a weak era.

The only difference between Rocky and Tyson are that Tyson kept fighting after his decline, where as Rocky quit before it.

Imagine if Tyson retired in 1989 at 37-0

Well said and though many will disagree with your comparison between him and Marciano it is a good one...

Both fought their primes in weak eras of great former champions on the decline and a mediocre division at best they were surrounded by....Hard to judge exactly what each man had because there was nothing to really test them to the fullest..

Though like you said Marciano retired before he was slipping Tyson stayed around hurting his legacy

[ICB]

I think a bit of both, i think Mike Tyson fans overrate how good he could do vs ATG fighters. And overrate his ability because he looked unbeatable against 2nd tier fighters.

But he's also underrated in other ways like his toughness for example, i think Mike Tyson's chin is the most underrated attribute of his. He took hammering shots off a huge puncher like Razor Ruddock, without showing any real ill effects.

But in the end he did clear out the Heavyweight division, and he did bring excitement to the Heavyweight division when it really needed it.

And whether you love him or hate him, i think he did do alot for the sport and he will never be forgotten.

[El Kabong]

He's always going to be a bit of both. He was a devistating puncher and an exciting fighter in a pretty weak division, I mean it wasn't until the early to mid 1990's when Holyfield, Bowe, Lewis, Mercer, Morrison, Foreman, Ruddock, Moorer et al became prominent in the division when the division became competitive again.

Tyson's era is just about comparable to today's era, only Tyson blasted out his competition in the early rounds whereas the Klitschko's pace themselves more like Larry Holmes did (another fighter with a weaker division).

As I say whenever anyone disses Marciano or Louis, you cannot judge a fighter based soley on the fighters he fought. It's not Tyson's fault that he had a weak era, but that being said I don't rate his chances vs most of the All-Time Greats.