Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 70

Thread: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia. Originally from Canada.
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    857
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    You may just consider me another member of the "anti-pac brigade", as I happen to be a Mayweather fan, but regardless here's my two cents, on your two cents, put em together, and we get four cents. Believe it or not, I like Manny. I agree, he's done wonderful things for the sport of boxing. I think that his well-publicized refusal to random blood-testing may even be one of the last great things he does for the sport, as I believe the sport needs better testing methods. I'll touch on that later.

    Firstly, you labeled PEDs (performance enhancing drugs) all under the same catagory, where "what you increase in strength, you also lose a little in stamina, especially cardio". This is most definitely not true. You are probably thinking of HGH, and while that's a possibility for the weight gain, there are other things like EPO (which Conte said was very likely in Pac's case) which increase your stamina. Whether you like to believe it or not, if used correctly, these drugs (and others) do give you a competitive advantage over your opponents, hence why commissions test for them. My point is that the testing procedures that they have in place at the moment, don't do their job, and as technology improves, so will the drugs, the problem will only get worse.

    Now, label me a Pac-hater or whatever, but I would also like to believe that Pacquiao has achieved these things clean. I am a boxing fan before I am ever a fan of a particular fighter (esp Mayweather). If the tables were turned I would be saying exactly the same thing to him.
    "innocent until proven guilty?" Manny isn't letting us go to the proving grounds/trail. The only way to prove himself not guilty is with a trail, a trail of random blood testing, rather than a lawsuit against Floyd Sr.

    Again, I'm a boxing fan before I'm ever a Mayweather fan. Boxing needs better testing methods in place (probably as much or more than any other sport).

    A good article on your interactions with Pacquiao and his team, which gives a bit of psychological insight, but still, Manny is refusing to fight because of the blood tests. The situation hasn't changed.
    Last edited by TheBranMan; 01-02-2010 at 11:39 AM.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Posts
    25
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBranMan View Post
    You may just consider me another member of the "anti-pac brigade", as I happen to be a Mayweather fan, but regardless here's my two cents, on your two cents, put em together, and we get four cents. Believe it or not, I like Manny. I agree, he's done wonderful things for the sport of boxing. I think that his well-publicized refusal to random blood-testing may even be one of the last great things he does for the sport, as I believe the sport needs better testing methods. I'll touch on that later.

    Firstly, you labeled PEDs (performance enhancing drugs) all under the same catagory, where "what you increase in strength, you also lose a little in stamina, especially cardio". This is most definitely not true. You are probably thinking of HGH, and while that's a possibility for the weight gain, there are other things like EPO (which Conte said was very likely in Pac's case) which increase your stamina. Whether you like to believe it or not, if used correctly, these drugs (and others) do give you a competitive advantage over your opponents, hence why commissions test for them. My point is that the testing procedures that they have in place at the moment, don't do their job, and as technology improves, so will the drugs, the problem will only get worse.

    Now, label me a Pac-hater or whatever, but I would also like to believe that Pacquiao has achieved these things clean. I am a boxing fan before I am ever a fan of a particular fighter (esp Mayweather). If the tables were turned I would be saying exactly the same thing to him.
    "innocent until proven guilty?" Manny isn't letting us go to the proving grounds/trail. The only way to prove himself not guilty is with a trail, a trail of random blood testing, rather than a lawsuit against Floyd Sr.

    Again, I'm a boxing fan before I'm ever a Mayweather fan. Boxing needs better testing methods in place (probably as much or more than any other sport).

    A good article on your interactions with Pacquiao and his team, which gives a bit of psychological insight, but still, Manny is refusing to fight because of the blood tests. The situation hasn't changed.

    Nice thoughts man. I do also believe in BTOD and innocent until proven guilty and also would love pacquiao to take the tests. I mean who wouldn't wanna see mayweather piss in his pants from thinking "Holy shit this guys for real. He did those things with skill alone"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Good posts in this thread.

    I'm of the view that it boils down to 2 demands. One fighter accepted the conditions (weight penalty) and the other outright refused (random drugs test). We can say it boils down to misinformation or Manny having too much pride, but to turn down $40m over a contractual demand which is nothing more than a random blood test, is strange. There is no real reason why Manny cannot go through with it especially if Mayweather will do so too. There is no doubt that we are dealing with fighters who have bloated egos. But Mayweather was actually the one willing to cede something in order to make the fight. Manny has scoffed his nose looking for mega showdowns with Malignaggi and Foreman. Pac trying to sue his way out of this situation, makes him look even worse. All people want is a fight, not a pointless courtroom showdown. Manny's refusal to take the tests has hurt him more than the words of anybody. Nobody listened when Mayweather Snr spoke all those months ago. It's only now Manny has refused a test and started to take legal action that people are really discussing the drug rumours.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1160
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Good posts in this thread.

    I'm of the view that it boils down to 2 demands. One fighter accepted the conditions (weight penalty) and the other outright refused (random drugs test). We can say it boils down to misinformation or Manny having too much pride, but to turn down $40m over a contractual demand which is nothing more than a random blood test, is strange.There is no real reason why Manny cannot go through with it especially if Mayweather will do so too. There is no doubt that we are dealing with fighters who have bloated egos. But Mayweather was actually the one willing to cede something in order to make the fight. Manny has scoffed his nose looking for mega showdowns with Malignaggi and Foreman. Pac trying to sue his way out of this situation, makes him look even worse. All people want is a fight, not a pointless courtroom showdown. Manny's refusal to take the tests has hurt him more than the words of anybody. Nobody listened when Mayweather Snr spoke all those months ago. It's only now Manny has refused a test and started to take legal action that people are really discussing the drug rumours.
    To be honest Miles, I think one demand is par for the course with regards the weight issue, it had to be stipulated after the stunt Floyd pulled with Marquez. It was also pure fact Mayweather came in over the limit. I do concede the penalty is pretty outrageous, but it is what it is. You have to make the limit full stop. How the Cotto fight was for a title a 145lbs is beyond me. The other demand is a slur on Manny and everything he has achieved to date, and most certainly not a fact. As for Manny's court action, it was the only way to go, and I'm sure anyone would have done the same to clear their name. It's not ideal for us as fans, but the bottom line is you have to put yourself in Manny's position. Just think for one moment Manny is completely clean, and just imagine how you would feel with all these allegations. Especially after how hard he has genuinely worked to get to this lofty perch of which he currently resides.

    I have no doubt that when Manny decides giving the random test is the only way, then he will concede to the demand, and everything will be above board. But like I said in my initial post, getting Manny to do something he is not 100% with is like pulling teeth. The on/off saga that went with his fight with Rick was ridiculous, and all over such petty things. In all the years being around Rick I have never seen anything like it, and very little came to light in the media. The proposed fight with Paulie or Yuri is nothing more than a smokescreen, and typical in the bargaining stakes, I've seen it many times in negotiations. Manny is one stubborn man, there is no question about that. How much of that comes from interests around him I'm not sure. I am sure this is a battle of the ego's though and nothing more.
    Last edited by Jimmy G-Force; 01-03-2010 at 10:19 AM.
    Some people say boxing is a matter of life or death, it's not, it's far more important than that.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    975
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Well someone here said that Victor Conte stated Pac was using EPO for his stamina. I disagree with that part. The thread starter is right on 1 thing and that is Pac never had a problem with stamina. I remember ICB started a thread and posted a video of Pac fighting for the WBC FLyweight championship when he was 19, although he was still very raw, you can still see the agression and him continously throwing 80-90 punches per round until the opponent was knockout. And at that time Roach and Ariza were not part of his team. Unless someone here is going to suggest those Fillipino cornermen were supplying him with EPO at that time?

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy G-Force View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Good posts in this thread.

    I'm of the view that it boils down to 2 demands. One fighter accepted the conditions (weight penalty) and the other outright refused (random drugs test). We can say it boils down to misinformation or Manny having too much pride, but to turn down $40m over a contractual demand which is nothing more than a random blood test, is strange.There is no real reason why Manny cannot go through with it especially if Mayweather will do so too. There is no doubt that we are dealing with fighters who have bloated egos. But Mayweather was actually the one willing to cede something in order to make the fight. Manny has scoffed his nose looking for mega showdowns with Malignaggi and Foreman. Pac trying to sue his way out of this situation, makes him look even worse. All people want is a fight, not a pointless courtroom showdown. Manny's refusal to take the tests has hurt him more than the words of anybody. Nobody listened when Mayweather Snr spoke all those months ago. It's only now Manny has refused a test and started to take legal action that people are really discussing the drug rumours.
    To be honest Miles, I think one demand is par for the course with regards the weight issue, it had to be stipulated after the stunt Floyd pulled with Marquez. I do concede the penalty is pretty outrageous, but it is what it is. You have to make the limit full stop. How the Cotto fight was for a title a 145lbs is beyond me. The other demand is a slur on Manny and everything he has achieved to date. As for Manny's court action, it was the only way to go, and I'm sure anyone would have done the same to clear their name. It's not ideal for us as fans, but the bottom line is you have to put yourself in Manny's position. Just think for one moment Manny is completely clean, and just imagine how you would feel with all these allegations. Especially after how hard he has genuinely worked to get to this lofty perch of which he currently resides.

    I have no doubt that when Manny decides giving the random test is the only way, then he will concede to the demand, and everything will be above board. But like I said in my initial post, getting Manny to do something he is not 100% with is like pulling teeth. The on/off saga that went with his fight with Rick was ridiculous, and all over such petty things. In all the years being around Rick I have never seen anything like it, and very little came to light in the media. The proposed fight with Paulie or Yuri is nothing more than a smokescreen, and typical in the bargaining stakes, I've seen it many times in negotiations. Manny is one stubborn man, there is no question about that. How much of that comes from interests around him I'm not sure. I am sure this is a battle of the ego's though and nothing more.
    I agree with the weight stipulation too. Mayweathers behaviour with Marquez was outrageous. Making weight should not really be an issue, but Mayweather did make it an issue through his actions. I was very critical of Mayweather at the time.

    Actually, this current situation is one of the very few times that I have been able to look at things from Mayweathers perspective. I'm usually irritated by him, but on this one point (the drugs test) I do think he has a case. It is unfair to accuse Manny of being on drugs, which some have done. After all, there is no real evidence. But having said that I can see the merits in random drug testing. On an ethical standpoint and looking at it from Mayweathers perspective, if there are loopholes, isn't it a good thing to erase all those loopholes and just make sure? Looking at it like that, I don't see any reason to refuse. If Manny had just agreed with no hullaballoo we would have had a fight made and this whole thing probably wouldn't have blown into the issue that it has become.

    I agree that what we have is a couple of ego's at loggerheads and it has just become plain annoying for the fans. Hopefully something will get worked out because this fight is what boxing needs right now. Would be a great shame to let it pass over what on the surface seems like such a quibble.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1160
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post


    Actually, this current situation is one of the very few times that I have been able to look at things from Mayweathers perspective. I'm usually irritated by him, but on this one point (the drugs test) I do think he has a case. It is unfair to accuse Manny of being on drugs, which some have done. After all, there is no real evidence. But having said that I can see the merits in random drug testing. On an ethical standpoint and looking at it from Mayweathers perspective, if there are loopholes, isn't it a good thing to erase all those loopholes and just make sure? Looking at it like that, I don't see any reason to refuse. If Manny had just agreed with no hullaballoo we would have had a fight made and this whole thing probably wouldn't have blown into the issue that it has become.

    I agree that what we have is a couple of ego's at loggerheads and it has just become plain annoying for the fans. Hopefully something will get worked out because this fight is what boxing needs right now. Would be a great shame to let it pass over what on the surface seems like such a quibble.
    I so wish that was true Miles. Call me a cynic, but from my experiences with both Mayweather and Pacman, this was always a fight that was going to be a million miles away from being signed smoothly. Regardless of the testing issue, there is a long way to go before these two agree amicably and sign on the dotted line.

    Your dead right about the fight though, it's a must have for the sport of boxing, never mind the fans. In 25 years of following the sport, I've not known of a bigger fight. The question about the era's greatest fighter can not be answered until these two meet. I also think when it finally does get made, they will be more than one fight, but I'll stop there as I'm getting waaayyy ahead of myself.
    Last edited by Jimmy G-Force; 01-02-2010 at 01:54 PM.
    Some people say boxing is a matter of life or death, it's not, it's far more important than that.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    170
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    822
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBranMan View Post
    Firstly, you labeled PEDs (performance enhancing drugs) all under the same catagory, where "what you increase in strength, you also lose a little in stamina, especially cardio". This is most definitely not true. You are probably thinking of HGH, and while that's a possibility for the weight gain, there are other things like EPO (which Conte said was very likely in Pac's case) which increase your stamina. Whether you like to believe it or not, if used correctly, these drugs (and others) do give you a competitive advantage over your opponents, hence why commissions test for them. My point is that the testing procedures that they have in place at the moment, don't do their job, and as technology improves, so will the drugs, the problem will only get worse.

    Now, label me a Pac-hater or whatever, but I would also like to believe that Pacquiao has achieved these things clean. I am a boxing fan before I am ever a fan of a particular fighter (esp Mayweather). If the tables were turned I would be saying exactly the same thing to him.
    "innocent until proven guilty?" Manny isn't letting us go to the proving grounds/trail. The only way to prove himself not guilty is with a trail, a trail of random blood testing, rather than a lawsuit against Floyd Sr.

    Again, I'm a boxing fan before I'm ever a Mayweather fan. Boxing needs better testing methods in place (probably as much or more than any other sport).

    A good article on your interactions with Pacquiao and his team, which gives a bit of psychological insight, but still, Manny is refusing to fight because of the blood tests. The situation hasn't changed.
    EPO Drug Testing, EPO Detection - World Anti-Doping Agency problem solved?
    Last edited by erik_corrales; 01-02-2010 at 01:37 PM. Reason: added link

  9. #9
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Sydney, Australia. Originally from Canada.
    Posts
    293
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    857
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by erik_corrales View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by TheBranMan View Post
    Firstly, you labeled PEDs (performance enhancing drugs) all under the same catagory, where "what you increase in strength, you also lose a little in stamina, especially cardio". This is most definitely not true. You are probably thinking of HGH, and while that's a possibility for the weight gain, there are other things like EPO (which Conte said was very likely in Pac's case) which increase your stamina. Whether you like to believe it or not, if used correctly, these drugs (and others) do give you a competitive advantage over your opponents, hence why commissions test for them. My point is that the testing procedures that they have in place at the moment, don't do their job, and as technology improves, so will the drugs, the problem will only get worse.

    Now, label me a Pac-hater or whatever, but I would also like to believe that Pacquiao has achieved these things clean. I am a boxing fan before I am ever a fan of a particular fighter (esp Mayweather). If the tables were turned I would be saying exactly the same thing to him.
    "innocent until proven guilty?" Manny isn't letting us go to the proving grounds/trail. The only way to prove himself not guilty is with a trail, a trail of random blood testing, rather than a lawsuit against Floyd Sr.

    Again, I'm a boxing fan before I'm ever a Mayweather fan. Boxing needs better testing methods in place (probably as much or more than any other sport).

    A good article on your interactions with Pacquiao and his team, which gives a bit of psychological insight, but still, Manny is refusing to fight because of the blood tests. The situation hasn't changed.
    EPO Drug Testing, EPO Detection - World Anti-Doping Agency problem solved?
    Interesting articles. I didn't realize that the urine test for EPO was just as useful as the blood test, however, EPO is only one of MANY performance enhancing drugs, more of which are being developed every year. It is still undeniable that some drugs are not detectable without random blood and urine testing, so the situation stays the same. Manny is refusing to fight because of drug tests. Period.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    3,244
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1402
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by TheBranMan View Post
    You may just consider me another member of the "anti-pac brigade", as I happen to be a Mayweather fan, but regardless here's my two cents, on your two cents, put em together, and we get four cents. Believe it or not, I like Manny. I agree, he's done wonderful things for the sport of boxing. I think that his well-publicized refusal to random blood-testing may even be one of the last great things he does for the sport, as I believe the sport needs better testing methods. I'll touch on that later.

    Firstly, you labeled PEDs (performance enhancing drugs) all under the same catagory, where "what you increase in strength, you also lose a little in stamina, especially cardio". This is most definitely not true. You are probably thinking of HGH, and while that's a possibility for the weight gain, there are other things like EPO (which Conte said was very likely in Pac's case) which increase your stamina. Whether you like to believe it or not, if used correctly, these drugs (and others) do give you a competitive advantage over your opponents, hence why commissions test for them. My point is that the testing procedures that they have in place at the moment, don't do their job, and as technology improves, so will the drugs, the problem will only get worse.

    Now, label me a Pac-hater or whatever, but I would also like to believe that Pacquiao has achieved these things clean. I am a boxing fan before I am ever a fan of a particular fighter (esp Mayweather). If the tables were turned I would be saying exactly the same thing to him.
    "innocent until proven guilty?" Manny isn't letting us go to the proving grounds/trail. The only way to prove himself not guilty is with a trail, a trail of random blood testing, rather than a lawsuit against Floyd Sr.

    Again, I'm a boxing fan before I'm ever a Mayweather fan. Boxing needs better testing methods in place (probably as much or more than any other sport).

    A good article on your interactions with Pacquiao and his team, which gives a bit of psychological insight, but still, Manny is refusing to fight because of the blood tests. The situation hasn't changed.
    i remember back then when me and my bros (i got 5 other brothers who all love boxing) first saw pac when he was maybe around 17 or 18, we were amazed at how manny keeps throwing power shots after power shots and never seem to tire. another thing is the kid has heart coz he doesn't mind getting hit as long as he put in his licks. my eldest bro said that the kid will never get anywhere because he doesn't have the proper boxing fundamentals and will lose once he faces someone with good skills. my bro even said no way he can beat a mexican coz we always considered them to be the best in the lower weight divisions. the rest of us defended manny's chances coz never have i seen anything like what the kid is capable of. we said all he needs is proper training coz he already got all the qualities of a potential great fighter. in time, even without world class training he won a world title and then he met freddy roach. freddy molded pac into what he is today. it took some time but i believe all the hard work paid off finally in the fight against david diaz where pacquiao finally realized his full potential.

    if manny is on epo to increase his stamina, he musta been on it since he started boxing. lol
    Last edited by KKisser; 01-02-2010 at 01:59 PM.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    why did MP react that way? because the accusation came from Mayweather sr.!

    MP knows that the mayweathers gonna play mind games on him.

    had the drugtesting been coursed thru the Nevada state commission, then IMHO, manny would have agreed.

    the key is how to approach MP the right way.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1160
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    the key is how to approach MP the right way.
    Isnt that just the truth. His way or the highway.
    Some people say boxing is a matter of life or death, it's not, it's far more important than that.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy G-Force View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    the key is how to approach MP the right way.
    Isnt that just the truth. His way or the highway.
    Yep, give him and his team ALL they want or no fight for the hungry public. As a man of the people Manny does come come across as a rather selfish and egotistical little man. All it took was a random blood test.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Posts
    314
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1160
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy G-Force View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    the key is how to approach MP the right way.
    Isnt that just the truth. His way or the highway.
    Yep, give him and his team ALL they want or no fight for the hungry public. As a man of the people Manny does come come across as a rather selfish and egotistical little man. All it took was a random blood test.
    Very true Miles. Power, fame and money can do alot to obscure a mans perception of himself. Sad but true. And as much as he comes across as this happy go lucky fighter, there is a huge power freak within that small frame. No question.
    Last edited by Jimmy G-Force; 01-02-2010 at 03:48 PM.
    Some people say boxing is a matter of life or death, it's not, it's far more important than that.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: A neutrals perspective on the Manny debate ..........

    Quote Originally Posted by Jimmy G-Force View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by pacQ View Post
    the key is how to approach MP the right way.
    Isnt that just the truth. His way or the highway.
    hehehehe

    imo, MP was "rubbed the wrong way".

    consider the timing - MP's birthday dec17, and christmas season here in the philippines, MP is very very busy with family and friends etc.

    He also had to deal with: 1) showbizness-his wapakman entry to the film festival. (it flopped) and 2) politics -May2010 elections.

    so many distractions, so much on this simple guy's mind then here comes the drugtesting demand from the mayweather camp.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Top 20 P4P Debate
    By gest12645 in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 27
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 09:13 PM
  2. HW DEBATE
    By SalTheButcher in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 10-04-2007, 03:37 PM
  3. Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-16-2007, 02:52 PM
  4. Pride vs UFC debate
    By VictorCharlie in forum Mixed Martial Arts
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 04-28-2007, 06:54 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing