I hope you're posting these links to back ElTerribleMorales' post because those links do not say that urine testing is the best. They say that most agencies use a mixture of blood & urine tests & in the 4th link it says that although urine testing was believed to be the most valid, the urine tests have been adapted into blood tests to detect newer erythropoiesis stimulating agents.
And in the last link it says the urine test can only detect 2-5 days after they've been ingested:
Unlike urine testing, which only detects illegal substances between two and five days after they have been ingested, hair samples offer a 'telltale history' of a person’s consumption patterns for up to a year, depending on the length of their hair... Human hair grows on average by 1cm a month, so even cheats with a 'number one' crop (3mm) could not evade detection unless they stopped taking drugs ten days before providing a sample. The test can also be carried out on body hair, so athletes with bald or wet-shaved heads would also expect to be caught out...
Although no definitive test yet exists for the detection of rhGH, there has been some progress of late. One method measures the amount of the 20-kD isomer in the serum, which is present at a level of 10% in normal samples but is suppressed when rhGH is given. This method has shown promise of detecting rhGH within 24 hours of the last dose; however, it requires a blood test and cannot detect cadaveric hGH.
There is mention of scientists developing a urine test that can detect HGH but your links are dated and there is no mention of it being used in the field but rather just mention of it being developed.
Bookmarks