Please.

Mosley way faster than Hearns? The chunky 154Lbs version of Mosley, who hadn't claimed a convincing victory in three years when Winky caught him? I don't think so.

Winky is a great jabber. I'm not arguing that. And he can counter wonderfully. But Hearns was EXCEPTIONALLY difficult to counter. He darted in and out quickly, on his toes always, moving left and right, poking you with the jab, dropping in the big right hand counter, flurrying. I think you're truly underestimating Tommy here. Winky looked great against Shane because, as I said, Shane was on a bad run, up at an uncomfortable weight, and he CAME STRAIGHT FORWARD. Wink just covered up and outworked him, Shane was wide open for the jab. Tommy is a completely different ball game.

Tommy presents a different challenge than Taylor. Watch the two. Hearns is superb. Taylor is very good.

It's easy to ask 'what known boxer has Tommy outboxed'? What known boxer has Winky outboxed?! He certainly didn't outbox Taylor, that was a real close fight. That point is irrelevant. We KNOW Wink is a great boxer and we know Tommy was too.

WHAT THE HELL? Winky has a a faster jab than Hearns? No way. I have to completely disagree with you there. I've never been like 'Wow, Winks jab is super fast'. When I watch Tommy's that's what I'm thinking.

And Taylor's jab is good, though not as good or as fast as Tommys, and not as sharp. And like I said, he was nullified where Hearns would not be, because the Hitman darts in and out and has great lateral movement. Plus, I don't think Hearns would even need to dance. He steps in with a few well timed, connected right hands Winky is getting smoked.