Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 43

Thread: "Slick" Fighters?

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North of South
    Posts
    2,694
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1081
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Yeah Floyd and Guzman (although he wasn't so slick the last fight) are fighters I would consider the epitome of slick.

    What about the guys I listed?

    Is Hopkins slick?
    Same really as Jimmy mentioned, as for Hopkins, personally no. He is awkward, but not slick, he leaves himself in the pocket for his opponent to miss then counter with a headbutt or shoulder butt for example, maybe the odd punch, but imo he is plain dirty rather than slick.

    I would place Lennox lewis in that mould of slick, rarely did he look troubled and most things he done looked effortless. Slick is getting in to range/ the pocket get ya shots off then get out without taking damage, Lewis opitomised this for me above all else, bar Mayweather.
    Hidden Content SADDO'S FIGHT NIGHT RD4 CHAMPION, TAKING ON ALL COMERS ! Hidden Content

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1287
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mattyhitman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Yeah Floyd and Guzman (although he wasn't so slick the last fight) are fighters I would consider the epitome of slick.

    What about the guys I listed?

    Is Hopkins slick?
    Same really as Jimmy mentioned, as for Hopkins, personally no. He is awkward, but not slick, he leaves himself in the pocket for his opponent to miss then counter with a headbutt or shoulder butt for example, maybe the odd punch, but imo he is plain dirty rather than slick.

    I would place Lennox lewis in that mould of slick, rarely did he look troubled and most things he done looked effortless. Slick is getting in to range/ the pocket get ya shots off then get out without taking damage, Lewis opitomised this for me above all else, bar Mayweather.
    Define your meaning of awkward because i personally feel "awkward" fighters are like Ricardo Mayorga, Emmanuel Augustus,etc.

    Hopkins is not "awkward"

    The check list for being a slick fighter imo is:

    Good footwork/movement
    Elusive/defensively sound
    good counter puncher

    Hopkins gets a tick in all those catergories.

    Hopkins is dirty, but no where near as bad as you make out. The guy has a excellent right hand and his left hook is sneaky and accurate also. He score points with those, Not headbutts and shoulders.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    North of South
    Posts
    2,694
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1081
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Pugilistic View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattyhitman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
    Yeah Floyd and Guzman (although he wasn't so slick the last fight) are fighters I would consider the epitome of slick.

    What about the guys I listed?

    Is Hopkins slick?
    Same really as Jimmy mentioned, as for Hopkins, personally no. He is awkward, but not slick, he leaves himself in the pocket for his opponent to miss then counter with a headbutt or shoulder butt for example, maybe the odd punch, but imo he is plain dirty rather than slick.

    I would place Lennox lewis in that mould of slick, rarely did he look troubled and most things he done looked effortless. Slick is getting in to range/ the pocket get ya shots off then get out without taking damage, Lewis opitomised this for me above all else, bar Mayweather.
    Define your meaning of awkward because i personally feel "awkward" fighters are like Ricardo Mayorga, Emmanuel Augustus,etc.

    Hopkins is not "awkward"

    The check list for being a slick fighter imo is:

    Good footwork/movement
    Elusive/defensively sound
    good counter puncher

    Hopkins gets a tick in all those catergories.

    Hopkins is dirty, but no where near as bad as you make out. The guy has a excellent right hand and his left hook is sneaky and accurate also. He score points with those, Not headbutts and shoulders.
    I was wondering when ya would pick up my Hopkins bashing, evaluation - My definition of awkward in relation to Hopkins ; hard to deal with, difficult to handle or manage, causing inconvenience. This for me is not slick. Listen mate he should have been DQ'ed against Calzaghe for the consistant fouling he done, he is a dirty boxer and he takes it to the limit and beyond. It makes me laugh when Hatton gets slated for wrestling and holding, when Hopkins is the opitomy of this.

    I appreciate he is YOUR hero and fave boxer, but hey thats my take on him and my opinion on his style
    Hidden Content SADDO'S FIGHT NIGHT RD4 CHAMPION, TAKING ON ALL COMERS ! Hidden Content

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Boonies
    Posts
    4,115
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    992
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    As someone brought it up, I can't remember when was the last time I saw a slick non-black boxer. It's pretty much like an white NFL running back, I don't think I've ever seen one in modern times.

  5. #5
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    As someone brought it up, I can't remember when was the last time I saw a slick non-black boxer. It's pretty much like an white NFL running back, I don't think I've ever seen one in modern times.
    Currently i'll say Kevin Mitchell is pretty slick, although he hasn't always shown it. But he made Breidis Prescott basically miss every big shot for 12 rounds, just using his upper body movement.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    18,367
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2572
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    I just think of it as good skills with an emphasis on defensive skills. So yeah Hopkins is an obvious one, Floyd, etc. But its one of those terms that means different things to different people I guess.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Posts
    400
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    876
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by generalbulldog View Post
    As someone brought it up, I can't remember when was the last time I saw a slick non-black boxer. It's pretty much like an white NFL running back, I don't think I've ever seen one in modern times.
    before yiz all laugh, i understand this guy isnt on the level of the guys mentioned here but i would say damaen kelly was pretty slick for a lower weights white guy

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Hopeman, Scotland
    Posts
    3,773
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1287
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mattyhitman View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Pugilistic View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Mattyhitman View Post

    Same really as Jimmy mentioned, as for Hopkins, personally no. He is awkward, but not slick, he leaves himself in the pocket for his opponent to miss then counter with a headbutt or shoulder butt for example, maybe the odd punch, but imo he is plain dirty rather than slick.

    I would place Lennox lewis in that mould of slick, rarely did he look troubled and most things he done looked effortless. Slick is getting in to range/ the pocket get ya shots off then get out without taking damage, Lewis opitomised this for me above all else, bar Mayweather.
    Define your meaning of awkward because i personally feel "awkward" fighters are like Ricardo Mayorga, Emmanuel Augustus,etc.

    Hopkins is not "awkward"

    The check list for being a slick fighter imo is:

    Good footwork/movement
    Elusive/defensively sound
    good counter puncher

    Hopkins gets a tick in all those catergories.

    Hopkins is dirty, but no where near as bad as you make out. The guy has a excellent right hand and his left hook is sneaky and accurate also. He score points with those, Not headbutts and shoulders.
    I was wondering when ya would pick up my Hopkins bashing, evaluation - My definition of awkward in relation to Hopkins ; hard to deal with, difficult to handle or manage, causing inconvenience. This for me is not slick. Listen mate he should have been DQ'ed against Calzaghe for the consistant fouling he done, he is a dirty boxer and he takes it to the limit and beyond. It makes me laugh when Hatton gets slated for wrestling and holding, when Hopkins is the opitomy of this.

    I appreciate he is YOUR hero and fave boxer, but hey thats my take on him and my opinion on his style
    I now see what you mean by Hopkins being awkward. I think Mayweather and other slick fighters belongs in a similar catergory also because they have a similar effect on his opponents. I personally feel all slick fighters have a awkwardness about them because they tend to move well and are tough to hit which is frustrating for alot of boxers.

    I disagree on the Calzaghe fight. Hopkins has been alot more dirty than that in his career (Look at his second fight with Elchols) and to be fair, Calzaghe did his fair share of rabbit punches and low blows on the inside. Hopkins wasn't all to blame when it came to fighting dirty in that fight.

    As far as Hopkins and Hatton are concerned, Hopkins has a excuse for hitting and holding. He is old, really old in boxing years. Holding was never part of Hopkins game in his younger days and his prime.

    Hatton doesn't have that excuse.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    330
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    854
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: "Slick" Fighters?

    Hopkins is definitely slick. the prime Hopkins that is.

    Sergio Martinez defitely is not slick. he's there to be hit.

    top 3 slicksters of the decade:

    1) Floyd
    2) Hopkins
    3) Mijares

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Question about a fighters "prime" / "past his best"
    By Fenster in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 12-07-2008, 10:50 AM
  2. A new British boxing film"FIGHTERS/REAL MONEY"
    By yvonne in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 11-05-2008, 09:20 AM
  3. Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-22-2007, 02:09 AM
  4. Replies: 40
    Last Post: 08-03-2006, 08:19 PM

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing