Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
Quote Originally Posted by ElTerribleMorales View Post
the fight was also in Manchester, Lazcano had Hatton in plenty of trouble and hurt badly on several occasions, so this is a fight where the scores don't reflect what actually went on in the fight
That is nonsense. Hatton won pretty much all the rounds and you can only really make a case for Hatton losing the two rounds he got buzzed in. In that sense the scores very much reflect what went on.
i thought Hatton won it clearly,, but 120-108 my ass, i had Ricky winning 8 or 9 of the 12 rounds, and the two rounds he lost, were pretty damn ugly, giving the indication that Ricky was anything but "unbeatable" at 140, Hatton although he beat Lazcano clearly he didn't do it effortlessly as some might try to make it out

So what ya saying is Ricky loses 2 maybe 3rds of a 12rd fight and thats not convincing enough for ya It's a boxing match he will get hit, and as we know he does, the is not many fights Ricky has been in that he hasnt been hit hard !

It's the contradiction that gets me, earlier in this thread you said Lazcano gave Ricky ' the fight of his life ' , now ya saying he won clearly but for 2-3rds