Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    830
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    CFH is right. Why do people have to keep ressurecting this issue?

    A thread is started based on a link that isn't even in the English language and posters come out here disparaging Manny. Do you people even understand what is being said or did you just made the comments based on the title?

    They talked about the blood test being REQUIRED of all professional boxers, and about it being obvious that Manny is not comfortable with the test. Manny explained in there why it's hard to have blood test taken near the fight, that he need strength, that if blood is taken it will weaken him and that it will take him 3 - 4 days to recover. He said it's okey to undergo the blood test as long as it's not near the fight date.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    49,121
    Mentioned
    950 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    0
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    CFH is right. Why do people have to keep ressurecting this issue?

    A thread is started based on a link that isn't even in the English language and posters come out here disparaging Manny. Do you people even understand what is being said or did you just made the comments based on the title?

    They talked about the blood test being REQUIRED of all professional boxers, and about it being obvious that Manny is not comfortable with the test. Manny explained in there why it's hard to have blood test taken near the fight, that he need strength, that if blood is taken it will weaken him and that it will take him 3 - 4 days to recover. He said it's okey to undergo the blood test as long as it's not near the fight date.
    The "weaken me" excuse is absurd as anyone who has taken a blood test will tell you. A 14 day window was plenty of time before the fight too and Manny turned it down and here he is once again giving blood, but this time 20 days out. The guy is full of crap. Nothing he says ever seems to add up. Politics might well be the job for him.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    830
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    CFH is right. Why do people have to keep ressurecting this issue?

    A thread is started based on a link that isn't even in the English language and posters come out here disparaging Manny. Do you people even understand what is being said or did you just made the comments based on the title?

    They talked about the blood test being REQUIRED of all professional boxers, and about it being obvious that Manny is not comfortable with the test. Manny explained in there why it's hard to have blood test taken near the fight, that he need strength, that if blood is taken it will weaken him and that it will take him 3 - 4 days to recover. He said it's okey to undergo the blood test as long as it's not near the fight date.
    The "weaken me" excuse is absurd as anyone who has taken a blood test will tell you. A 14 day window was plenty of time before the fight too and Manny turned it down and here he is once again giving blood, but this time 20 days out. The guy is full of crap. Nothing he says ever seems to add up. Politics might well be the job for him.
    It may be absurd to a number of people but there are some who truly believe it.

    Here's a video from an interview of Manny taken sometime in 2005 after the first Erik Morales fight.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_97MccjZwV4

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    130
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    990
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    CFH is right. Why do people have to keep ressurecting this issue?

    A thread is started based on a link that isn't even in the English language and posters come out here disparaging Manny. Do you people even understand what is being said or did you just made the comments based on the title?

    They talked about the blood test being REQUIRED of all professional boxers, and about it being obvious that Manny is not comfortable with the test. Manny explained in there why it's hard to have blood test taken near the fight, that he need strength, that if blood is taken it will weaken him and that it will take him 3 - 4 days to recover. He said it's okey to undergo the blood test as long as it's not near the fight date.
    The "weaken me" excuse is absurd as anyone who has taken a blood test will tell you. A 14 day window was plenty of time before the fight too and Manny turned it down and here he is once again giving blood, but this time 20 days out. The guy is full of crap. Nothing he says ever seems to add up. Politics might well be the job for him.
    It may be absurd to a number of people but there are some who truly believe it.

    Here's a video from an interview of Manny taken sometime in 2005 after the first Erik Morales fight.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_97MccjZwV4
    But to be fair, in regards to the video, he did lose that fight. What do you expect him to say?

    Pacquiao & his people have a history of relying on excuses after they don't get the outcome they wanted. Remember the "wrong kind of socks" fiasco after the first JMM fight?

    I'm not saying it didn't make him weak & that was the reason he lost the fight to Morales. I'm just raising the question would he have said all this if he had won that fight? Would the blood tests have been an issue if he had won?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    830
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by knodaledge View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by miles View Post

    The "weaken me" excuse is absurd as anyone who has taken a blood test will tell you. A 14 day window was plenty of time before the fight too and Manny turned it down and here he is once again giving blood, but this time 20 days out. The guy is full of crap. Nothing he says ever seems to add up. Politics might well be the job for him.
    It may be absurd to a number of people but there are some who truly believe it.

    Here's a video from an interview of Manny taken sometime in 2005 after the first Erik Morales fight.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_97MccjZwV4
    But to be fair, in regards to the video, he did lose that fight. What do you expect him to say?

    Pacquiao & his people have a history of relying on excuses after they don't get the outcome they wanted. Remember the "wrong kind of socks" fiasco after the first JMM fight?

    I'm not saying it didn't make him weak & that was the reason he lost the fight to Morales. I'm just raising the question would he have said all this if he had won that fight? Would the blood tests have been an issue if he had won?
    Your statement implies the possibility that it may have made him weak. That is what I was trying to say in this forum all along, that there are a lot of speculations and possibilities with regards to the Pacquiao-Mayweather fiasco nor in any other fights. As boxing fans, we owe it to the boxers to at least give them the benefit of the doubt in the absence of credible evidence. They put their lives at risk for our entertainment. (I will jump ahead of myself and comment on those thinking that they get paid millions anyway. A select few of them do but they deserved it. However, they all started from the bottom.).

    This forum will be a harmonious place if we just all agree. But then again, it will also make it boring.

    I rest my case.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Beyond the wall
    Posts
    17,202
    Mentioned
    38 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    4426
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by knodaledge View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    It may be absurd to a number of people but there are some who truly believe it.

    Here's a video from an interview of Manny taken sometime in 2005 after the first Erik Morales fight.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_97MccjZwV4
    But to be fair, in regards to the video, he did lose that fight. What do you expect him to say?

    Pacquiao & his people have a history of relying on excuses after they don't get the outcome they wanted. Remember the "wrong kind of socks" fiasco after the first JMM fight?

    I'm not saying it didn't make him weak & that was the reason he lost the fight to Morales. I'm just raising the question would he have said all this if he had won that fight? Would the blood tests have been an issue if he had won?
    Your statement implies the possibility that it may have made him weak. That is what I was trying to say in this forum all along, that there are a lot of speculations and possibilities with regards to the Pacquiao-Mayweather fiasco nor in any other fights. As boxing fans, we owe it to the boxers to at least give them the benefit of the doubt in the absence of credible evidence. They put their lives at risk for our entertainment. (I will jump ahead of myself and comment on those thinking that they get paid millions anyway. A select few of them do but they deserved it. However, they all started from the bottom.).

    This forum will be a harmonious place if we just all agree. But then again, it will also make it boring.

    I rest my case.
    That case and the test he just had for Clottey are more invasive than the one Mayweather was requiring. And by saying there is a possibility it weakened him you must also admit there is a possibility it didn't and Morales was simply in fact the better man that night.

    Damit I didn't mean to get sucked back into this, disregard..............
    For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Not in the Neutral Corner
    Posts
    1,120
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    830
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by killersheep View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by knodaledge View Post

    But to be fair, in regards to the video, he did lose that fight. What do you expect him to say?

    Pacquiao & his people have a history of relying on excuses after they don't get the outcome they wanted. Remember the "wrong kind of socks" fiasco after the first JMM fight?

    I'm not saying it didn't make him weak & that was the reason he lost the fight to Morales. I'm just raising the question would he have said all this if he had won that fight? Would the blood tests have been an issue if he had won?
    Your statement implies the possibility that it may have made him weak. That is what I was trying to say in this forum all along, that there are a lot of speculations and possibilities with regards to the Pacquiao-Mayweather fiasco nor in any other fights. As boxing fans, we owe it to the boxers to at least give them the benefit of the doubt in the absence of credible evidence. They put their lives at risk for our entertainment. (I will jump ahead of myself and comment on those thinking that they get paid millions anyway. A select few of them do but they deserved it. However, they all started from the bottom.).

    This forum will be a harmonious place if we just all agree. But then again, it will also make it boring.

    I rest my case.
    That case and the test he just had for Clottey are more invasive than the one Mayweather was requiring. And by saying there is a possibility it weakened him you must also admit there is a possibility it didn't and Morales was simply in fact the better man that night.

    Damit I didn't mean to get sucked back into this, disregard..............
    For me, Morales was the better man that night. I highlighted that statement to consider the possibility that the 'weaken me' excuse for the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight may actually be valid (even though it may be erroneous).

    Damit also, I already said that I rest my case .............

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1393
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    CFH is right. Why do people have to keep ressurecting this issue?

    A thread is started based on a link that isn't even in the English language and posters come out here disparaging Manny. Do you people even understand what is being said or did you just made the comments based on the title?

    They talked about the blood test being REQUIRED of all professional boxers, and about it being obvious that Manny is not comfortable with the test. Manny explained in there why it's hard to have blood test taken near the fight, that he need strength, that if blood is taken it will weaken him and that it will take him 3 - 4 days to recover. He said it's okey to undergo the blood test as long as it's not near the fight date.



    So why did he not take the fight with Floyd??

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Posts
    14,152
    Mentioned
    124 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1996
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    These test don't test for PEDs and they're scheduled not random anyway. As far as getting blood goes I read that the Brazilian MMA champ Silva (?) gets a blood sample taken at the end of every sparring round when he's building up to a fight to check his lactic acid levels, which puts Pacneedle's refusal in perspective. And before all the testing thing blew up it would have been more like $60 million each, not $40 million. If they'd done 3 million PPVs at sixty dollars a pop that would have been $45 million each just from the PPV money without the gate, site fee, British PPV, foreign TV, sponsorship etc.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2904
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Manny looks a little bloated there there isn't the usual crazy definition in his midsection. As far as the blood test, nothing surprising everyone knew the excuses Roach gave were bullshit anyways. He was just protecting his fighter with that I don't think anybody believed it.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    West,Yorkshire,UK
    Posts
    3,832
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1440
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    CFH is right. Why do people have to keep ressurecting this issue?

    A thread is started based on a link that isn't even in the English language and posters come out here disparaging Manny. Do you people even understand what is being said or did you just made the comments based on the title?

    They talked about the blood test being REQUIRED of all professional boxers, and about it being obvious that Manny is not comfortable with the test. Manny explained in there why it's hard to have blood test taken near the fight, that he need strength, that if blood is taken it will weaken him and that it will take him 3 - 4 days to recover. He said it's okey to undergo the blood test as long as it's not near the fight date.



    So why did he not take the fight with Floyd??
    Maybe he thinks he needs PED's for Floyd but not Clottey

    Just a theory and I don't even believe it myself. I don't think Pac really juices but I have to say some of his behaviour is quite strange.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    California and Philippines
    Posts
    86
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    805
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Pac having blood taken 20 days before the Clottey fight..

    Quote Originally Posted by skel1983 View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by InTheNeutralCorner View Post
    CFH is right. Why do people have to keep ressurecting this issue?

    A thread is started based on a link that isn't even in the English language and posters come out here disparaging Manny. Do you people even understand what is being said or did you just made the comments based on the title?

    They talked about the blood test being REQUIRED of all professional boxers, and about it being obvious that Manny is not comfortable with the test. Manny explained in there why it's hard to have blood test taken near the fight, that he need strength, that if blood is taken it will weaken him and that it will take him 3 - 4 days to recover. He said it's okey to undergo the blood test as long as it's not near the fight date.
    So why did he not take the fight with Floyd??
    not enough time to prepare for fight-Roach even came out and said that. Floyd presents a lot of problems 4 Manny; and he's not the typical slow, in your face, battle worn fighter that he's been feasting on since JMM 2. Counter punchers as skilled and as fast as Floyd clearly give MP trouble and Roach knows he needs more than 2 months.

    Maybe, his mind is on the elections; needed a bit of time to rest from Cotto fight...waiting a bit may make the stakes bigger

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Winner of Valuev vs Haye must fight Ruiz within 90 days.
    By mattboxingfan in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 09-02-2009, 12:27 AM
  2. Mexican Fighter declared brain dead days after fight
    By SorceryatCaesar in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 10-24-2008, 05:24 AM
  3. The big fight is only 4 days away! Who will win??
    By p4pboxing in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 04-16-2008, 07:50 PM
  4. Fighting 2 days after a fight
    By No Contest in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 06-28-2007, 03:56 AM
  5. Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-12-2006, 09:51 PM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing