I did not say Dirrel beat Froch. You said Froch owned Dirrel which was totally false. That was a very close fight and there was no "ownage".
And secondly, you say Dirrel was acting -and- you say he was knocked cold, so maybe if you choose -1- of these, it would be a little more believable.
There is a few decisions and things that I don't like about Cole in the match but I can easily see an argument why Abraham has been disqualified, unfortunately...
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
Should Arthur have been Dq'd?? had Dirrell stayed upright no perhaps he should have lost a point but as Dirrell went over and ref didn't know if he was really out or not then yes Arthur should have been dq'd but the only real problem i have is the acting by Dirrell it was embarrassing Arthur skimmed his face with a left and he slipped over he then followed through with the right hand. Now here is the acting Dirrell looks at Arthur he squints his left eye then raises his left hand to his face he falls over then rolls under the ring he then does the river dance with his legs. Then as the ref says get the doctor in here Dirrel as if by miracle turns on to his side perhaps knowing if the doc gets near him he will be found out to be acting he then does his best to avoid the doctor shining the light in his eyes then when interviewed he says he was knocked out then someone says no you won then he says yes i was hit while i was down just got his memory back as quick as that. And he kept holding his left side of his face where he had been hit now this was laughable he had been punched for 11 rounds and this 1 punch was making him hold his face no its cos he was highlighting the fact he had been hit on it. The guy is a joke he ran like a scared child against Froch he also did some daft stuff and now this against Arthur he knew Arthur was catching up to him and he could have got him Dirrell didn't want to end up out cold like Jermain and many other against Arthur this oportunity presented itself and Dirrell took it cos he dint want to be 0-2 in this comp.
Gerald McClennan had a similar delayed reaction and grabbing his head in a similar fashion. Sure he was acting too?
Seriously it's like everyone forgot what a delayed reaction is because they want to convince themself that Abraham was gonna come back and win.
Tell me when was Dirrell ever hurt by anything Abraham threw? When was he ever hanging on for dear life? The fact is the only shot that hurt Dirrell or had him in danger was the one he took on the canvas. Abraham was not close to stopping him at any point in that fight.
Last edited by Majesty; 03-29-2010 at 12:45 PM.
Hidden Content
Original & Best: The Sugar Man
The DQ was justified, but I didn't like seeing it as I thought Dirrell was wilting and Abraham had finally realised it was do or die. You can't hit a man when he is down. It was a rush of blood and Abraham probably will regret it when he watches the video and sees Dirrell down with his legs splayed all over the place.
I also agree with GAME that Froch beat Dirrell, but ownage is probably a bit strong.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks