Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 25 of 25

Thread: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

Share/Bookmark
  1. #16
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHomo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by amat View Post
    Who knows?

    Also, why wouldn't Showtime want Froch to win against Kessler? Who's more appealing to the Americans, some guy from a country most couldn't place on the right side of the continent or a dumb yet fairly exciting Brit. What is their motivation for conspiring to kick Froch out?

    You're attitude is why good ideas don't last in boxing.

    Why dont we just say if we are gonna have a fair non-biased competition such as this we will hold every single fight in neutral venues thus ensuring that the real winner will provail every time

    the current super 6 reads;
    ward 3
    abraham 3
    Froch 2
    kessler 2
    Dirrell 2
    green 0

    had the results of been fair it would now read:

    abraham 5
    froch 4
    kessler 2
    ward 0
    green 0
    dirrell 0

    see how the american thing comes into play
    First, Ward only has 2 points, not 3.

    You are wrong about two things. One, the pre-tournmanet favorite was Kessler, not Froch. Go back and check the odds. Kessler was the most marketable and well-known (other than Taylor) fighter going into the tournament.

    Second, the toughest schedule is by far that of the Americans, Taylor/Green, with fights against the three toughest challengers and all on their opponent's turf. Taylor/Green fights Abraham (in Germany)/Ward (in Oakland)/Kessler (in Denmark), which is tougher than Froch's Dirrell (In Nottingham), Kessler (Denmark), Abraham (in Neutral Territory).

    Third, Abraham had the weakest schedule with Taylor (in Germany)/Dirrell (In Michigan)/Froch(in Neutral Territory).

    Lastly, either way you look at it, the Froch-Dirrell fight was very close. Yet, Froch got the win!! If this was some American Showtime conspiracy, Dirrell would have got a win in a close fight. Correct?

    Showtime is in this for profit. Do you really think Ward/Dirrell are the most profitable fighters in the tournament? By far, the two most profitable fighters in the tournament are Kessler and Abraham. It's not even close.

    One more thing, You don't think Abraham should have been DQ'd?

    If there is anything conspiratorial in this tournament, it is that the hometown fighter wins every time.
    Last edited by Rantcatrat; 04-27-2010 at 02:45 PM.

  2. #17
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Delaware
    Posts
    6,763
    Mentioned
    32 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1313
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Froch is only 10 seconds (against Taylor) away from having lost 3 in a row
    I was at that fight and I'm telling you that is totally wrong. After approximately the seventh round, there was a huge momentum swing and the you could feel it was just a matter of time before Froch got to him.

    As much as you want to say Froch lost against Dirrell, if there is a reason Dirrell wound up with a loss, it's his fault. Much like Froch said after he lost to Mikkel, Dirrell just didn't do enough. In a fight against a champion on his home turf, you have to win convincingly.

  3. #18
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Posts
    2,250
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1857
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Froch is only 10 seconds (against Taylor) away from having lost 3 in a row
    Very true..

    and even with that 'momentum swing' to froch, the judges cards STILL had Taylor winning even with that knockdown in the last round before the KO.. so regardless of momentum, which means nothing on a score card, if Taylor didn't get KO'd that really was 3 fights Froch was on the verge of losing..

    as i said before this past weekends fight, Froch is very beatable, and for HTH to say he's the best super middle of the last decade or whatever, is ridiculous..

  4. #19
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    london, vegas, crete, algarve, milan
    Posts
    6,339
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1450
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Froch is only 10 seconds (against Taylor) away from having lost 3 in a row
    I was at that fight and I'm telling you that is totally wrong. After approximately the seventh round, there was a huge momentum swing and the you could feel it was just a matter of time before Froch got to him.

    As much as you want to say Froch lost against Dirrell, if there is a reason Dirrell wound up with a loss, it's his fault. Much like Froch said after he lost to Mikkel, Dirrell just didn't do enough. In a fight against a champion on his home turf, you have to win convincingly.
    Well said rant

    froch took at least 2 of the opening 6 and the complete second half of that fight

    Dont get me wrong i only carl a point up going into the last round and wouldnt of cried foul had that of been a mandatory 10-9 taylor last round.

    But world championship boxing in this day and age is a 12round affair and if you arent able to manage that it doesnt matter what you do in the 1st 11
    one dangerous horrible bloke

  5. #20
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Boston
    Posts
    7,040
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1753
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Froch is only 10 seconds (against Taylor) away from having lost 3 in a row
    Thank Christ someone said it.
    Hidden Content
    "There's nothing special about him." -Sergiy Dzinziruk

  6. #21
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    916
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    I actaully throught Froch had the toughest draw.

    Abraham and Kessler are the two toughest and Dirrell is a spolier.

    Froch won all day long against Dirrell, without a shadow of a doubt, but was never going to be a convincing win because of Dirrells tactics.


    Does anyone have/ can put up the fixtures of each fighter? I'm curious now to see who has been fighting who.

  7. #22
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1393
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by 0james0 View Post
    I actaully throught Froch had the toughest draw.

    Abraham and Kessler are the two toughest and Dirrell is a spolier.

    Froch won all day long against Dirrell, without a shadow of a doubt, but was never going to be a convincing win because of Dirrells tactics.


    Does anyone have/ can put up the fixtures of each fighter? I'm curious now to see who has been fighting who.

    Ward fights Kessler/Green/Dirrell

    Dirrell fights Froch/Abraham/Ward

    Froch fights Dirrell/Kessler/Abraham

    Abraham fights Taylor/Dirrell/Froch

    Green fights Ward/Kessler

    Kessler fights Ward/Froch/Green

  8. #23
    ICB Guest

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHomo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by BIG H View Post
    Froch is only 10 seconds (against Taylor) away from having lost 3 in a row
    I was at that fight and I'm telling you that is totally wrong. After approximately the seventh round, there was a huge momentum swing and the you could feel it was just a matter of time before Froch got to him.

    As much as you want to say Froch lost against Dirrell, if there is a reason Dirrell wound up with a loss, it's his fault. Much like Froch said after he lost to Mikkel, Dirrell just didn't do enough. In a fight against a champion on his home turf, you have to win convincingly.
    Well said rant

    froch took at least 2 of the opening 6 and the complete second half of that fight

    Dont get me wrong i only carl a point up going into the last round and wouldnt of cried foul had that of been a mandatory 10-9 taylor last round.

    But world championship boxing in this day and age is a 12round affair and if you arent able to manage that it doesnt matter what you do in the 1st 11
    Wow just wow


  9. #24
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Montreal/Luxembourg
    Posts
    6,399
    Mentioned
    25 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1074
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by ICB View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by HattonTheHomo View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Rantcatrat View Post

    I was at that fight and I'm telling you that is totally wrong. After approximately the seventh round, there was a huge momentum swing and the you could feel it was just a matter of time before Froch got to him.

    As much as you want to say Froch lost against Dirrell, if there is a reason Dirrell wound up with a loss, it's his fault. Much like Froch said after he lost to Mikkel, Dirrell just didn't do enough. In a fight against a champion on his home turf, you have to win convincingly.
    Well said rant

    froch took at least 2 of the opening 6 and the complete second half of that fight

    Dont get me wrong i only carl a point up going into the last round and wouldnt of cried foul had that of been a mandatory 10-9 taylor last round.

    But world championship boxing in this day and age is a 12round affair and if you arent able to manage that it doesnt matter what you do in the 1st 11
    Wow just wow

    Froch was severely outpointed, outboxed and outclassed... I don't see how HThomo could possibly saw Froch leading on points by any mean
    Hidden Content
    That's the way it is, not the way it ends

  10. #25
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Guernsey, Channel Islands
    Posts
    8,719
    Mentioned
    208 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1395
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Super 6 Tiebreaking Rules?

    Quote Originally Posted by Nameless View Post

    Ha ha, only in America!!!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. What are the tiebreaking rules for SMW tourney?
    By JonesJrMayweather in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 04-06-2010, 03:00 AM
  2. Boxrec RULES!!!!
    By killersheep in forum Boxing Talk
    Replies: 133
    Last Post: 12-28-2008, 11:01 PM
  3. Nevada changes rules
    By Taeth in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 25
    Last Post: 12-22-2008, 05:51 PM
  4. Rules for us Ladies...
    By emma in forum Off Topic
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 04-30-2006, 12:42 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing