Yeah, but how would you feel if you were one of the good fighters, who had to be co-champion with one of the crappy fighters.Originally Posted by boozeboxer
 |
|
|
|
Thanks: 0
Likes: 0
Dislikes: 0
Forum Greatest Of All Time
Array
Re: the WBA and their ridiculous worthless titles
Yeah, but how would you feel if you were one of the good fighters, who had to be co-champion with one of the crappy fighters.
Kick his ass Sea Bass!
Array
Re: the WBA and their ridiculous worthless titles
Yeah, but how would you feel if you were one of the good fighters, who had to be co-champion with one of the crappy fighters.
Very thankful for the opportunity to get to unify what I should have had in the first place.
"If there's a better chin in the world than Pryor's, it has to be on Mount Rushmore." -Pat Putnam.
Una mas semana
Array
Re: the WBA and their ridiculous worthless titles
There are some ultra legit fighters in there, but the point remains there should be only one champ per division.
For every story told that divides us, I believe there are a thousand untold that unite us.
Old Guard's cutman
Array
Re: the WBA and their ridiculous worthless titles
Most definitely. Especially because the system being as it is, it means that... there could be 2-3 different unification for the same weight class going on
Hidden Content
That's the way it is, not the way it ends
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks