
Originally Posted by
Snakey
Just to clarify, i thought Khan was very impressive against Paulie. He showed good movement,speed and combination punching. But we have to be honest with ourselves, I have nothing against Khan (im not english so I dont know about all the press he gets in england and reputation he has)....but he looked good against a guy that couldnt win. We all knew Paulie was going to get beat although alot of people were hoping for him to pull off an upset. Paulie is a light puncher with alright boxing ability and he faced a very well versed boxer in Khan who had nothing to fear. Dont forget Ricky Hatton looked great outboxing paulie and then got hammered against Pacman..why did he look great, coz he had nothing to fear.
Mayweathers power seems to get underrated around here yet everyone is happy to say that pacmans power comes from the fact hes so quick and you cant see his punches coming. Mayweather would land solidly in one round against Khan let alone over 12, what have we seen from Khan that can say he would be able to take mayweathers best for longer than one round?
Bookmarks