Boxing Forums



User Tag List

Thanks Thanks:  0
Likes Likes:  0
Dislikes Dislikes:  0
Results 1 to 15 of 52

Thread: Wladimir cracks the POUND FOR POUND Ratings

Share/Bookmark

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,571
    Mentioned
    12 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    926
    Cool Clicks

  2. #2
    El Kabong Guest

    Default Re: Wladimir cracks the POUND FOR POUND Ratings

    No way Sergio Martinez is that low

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Manchester
    Posts
    8,641
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1402
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir cracks the POUND FOR POUND Ratings


    Boxrec rankings are the biggest joke going mate, after CFH opened the Collazo thread I had a little look to see when Sergiy Dzinziruk was fighting Mayorgo after Collazo didn't fancy it and Boxrec have him ranked at 24 at 154!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! TWENTY FUCKING FOUR LMAO just one ahead of our world class British champion Sam Webb lol.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    kentucky
    Posts
    4,334
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    1192
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir cracks the POUND FOR POUND Ratings

    Yeah got to agree boxrec rankings are basically a joke and whatever points system they have is insane for the most part.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    In a hole in the ground
    Posts
    23,387
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    3382
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir cracks the POUND FOR POUND Ratings

    Completely overdue imo, the guy has dominated the heavyweight scene for the last 4 or so years.

    I know some purists dont like having heavyweights ranked p4p but I really disagree. I think it's important for ALL boxers to be eligable for the p4p rankings. I don't really see them as a 'who would win if all every fighter was the same size' type nonsense, I just see them as who are the top 10 best fighters across all weight classes right now, and clearly Wlad has dominated the heavyweight weight class for pretty much longer than any other fighter has dominated their own, so it's a bit nonsensical to just pretend he doesn't exist because he's a heavyweight.

    I mean if heavyweights are going to feature on the all time rankings how can they not feature in the current rankings, that makes no logical sense to me at all.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2913
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir cracks the POUND FOR POUND Ratings

    I think that's the opposite of how a P4P list should be done, none of that takes into account how a guy actually looks when he gets into the ring.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    The Bay Area
    Posts
    14,471
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Punch Power
    2913
    Cool Clicks

    Default Re: Wladimir cracks the POUND FOR POUND Ratings

    Also I think Fenster has hit the nail on the head here. It's not discrediting Wlad but it's hard to say he's a pound for pound guy when he's the biggest guy in the heavyweight division aside from his stupid brother. I'm a fan of Wlad (the 2005 version of amat wants to fight me now) but he's the biggest guy in the division. Look at his fights with Chambers and Sultan, all he did was use his size advantages and against Sultan he held on whenever Sultan got closer then 15 feet. Bradley fights guys that are his size, how he isn't in the top 10 but Hopkins is is a joke in my opinion. Wlad is a great heavyweight fighter but I'll hold off on the P4P talk.

    If David Haye or Tomas Adamek did what Wlad did then it would be a different story.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-13-2007, 02:10 PM
  2. Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-02-2007, 06:08 AM
  3. Replies: 44
    Last Post: 01-05-2007, 04:39 AM

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  




Boxing | Boxing Photos | Boxing News | Boxing Forum | Boxing Rankings

Copyright © 2000 - 2025 Saddo Boxing - Boxing