How Far Away Is Froch From Being a Pound 4 Pounder?

[CFH]

After Pascal beat Dawson, it had me thinking about Froch...

He's beaten Dirrell, Pascal and he knocked out Taylor. He ran Kessler pretty close in Denmark - infact i had it very close, only to be told i was wrong, oddly enough, even by people who'd only watched it on a stream.

That's besides the point. IF Froch beats Abraham, where does that leave him? Talent wise, he'd be nowhere near, but you can't argue with his record (If he beats Abraham).

Would anybody have him anywhere near their top 10?

Pascal was not his best and has improved greatly since then, I pick him over Froch now the way he jumps in scores then keeps his distance so well...JT was beating him until he gassed JT had the fight in the bag, The Kessler fight was closer then given credit for and it is a shame he was given such poor scores...

IF he beats AA it would be a very good run for him but he is not near the P4P top 20 let alone 10...he is not the best SMW in the world let alone asnything else..

He is an exciting fighter who will go at it and you can never say Froch tried to earn an easy payday...He also gives you your Moneys worth even if he is on the losing side I can say that for him and that nis more then a lot of the top 10 P4P ranked guys

His poor defense will catch up to him eventually where he takes too much abuse plus he is not the quickest fighter in the world

I would argue that Pascal was at his best in that fight, such as it was then, and that as a result of the Froch fight he became the fighter he is today.

[DaxxKahn]

After Pascal beat Dawson, it had me thinking about Froch...

He's beaten Dirrell, Pascal and he knocked out Taylor. He ran Kessler pretty close in Denmark - infact i had it very close, only to be told i was wrong, oddly enough, even by people who'd only watched it on a stream.

That's besides the point. IF Froch beats Abraham, where does that leave him? Talent wise, he'd be nowhere near, but you can't argue with his record (If he beats Abraham).

Would anybody have him anywhere near their top 10?

Pascal was not his best and has improved greatly since then, I pick him over Froch now the way he jumps in scores then keeps his distance so well...JT was beating him until he gassed JT had the fight in the bag, The Kessler fight was closer then given credit for and it is a shame he was given such poor scores...

IF he beats AA it would be a very good run for him but he is not near the P4P top 20 let alone 10...he is not the best SMW in the world let alone asnything else..

He is an exciting fighter who will go at it and you can never say Froch tried to earn an easy payday...He also gives you your Moneys worth even if he is on the losing side I can say that for him and that nis more then a lot of the top 10 P4P ranked guys

His poor defense will catch up to him eventually where he takes too much abuse plus he is not the quickest fighter in the world

I would argue that Pascal was at his best in that fight, such as it was then, and that as a result of the Froch fight he became the fighter he is today.

Maybe I worded it wrong....At his best I more or less meant that he was not the best version of Pascal....Pascal is much much better today....

[CFH]

After Pascal beat Dawson, it had me thinking about Froch...

He's beaten Dirrell, Pascal and he knocked out Taylor. He ran Kessler pretty close in Denmark - infact i had it very close, only to be told i was wrong, oddly enough, even by people who'd only watched it on a stream.

That's besides the point. IF Froch beats Abraham, where does that leave him? Talent wise, he'd be nowhere near, but you can't argue with his record (If he beats Abraham).

Would anybody have him anywhere near their top 10?

Pascal was not his best and has improved greatly since then, I pick him over Froch now the way he jumps in scores then keeps his distance so well...JT was beating him until he gassed JT had the fight in the bag, The Kessler fight was closer then given credit for and it is a shame he was given such poor scores...

IF he beats AA it would be a very good run for him but he is not near the P4P top 20 let alone 10...he is not the best SMW in the world let alone asnything else..

He is an exciting fighter who will go at it and you can never say Froch tried to earn an easy payday...He also gives you your Moneys worth even if he is on the losing side I can say that for him and that nis more then a lot of the top 10 P4P ranked guys

His poor defense will catch up to him eventually where he takes too much abuse plus he is not the quickest fighter in the world

I would argue that Pascal was at his best in that fight, such as it was then, and that as a result of the Froch fight he became the fighter he is today.

Maybe I worded it wrong....At his best I more or less meant that he was not the best version of Pascal....Pascal is much much better today....

Absolutely, but I think that's due to the Froch fight. I'd love to see a rematch.

[DaxxKahn]

After Pascal beat Dawson, it had me thinking about Froch...

He's beaten Dirrell, Pascal and he knocked out Taylor. He ran Kessler pretty close in Denmark - infact i had it very close, only to be told i was wrong, oddly enough, even by people who'd only watched it on a stream.

That's besides the point. IF Froch beats Abraham, where does that leave him? Talent wise, he'd be nowhere near, but you can't argue with his record (If he beats Abraham).

Would anybody have him anywhere near their top 10?

Pascal was not his best and has improved greatly since then, I pick him over Froch now the way he jumps in scores then keeps his distance so well...JT was beating him until he gassed JT had the fight in the bag, The Kessler fight was closer then given credit for and it is a shame he was given such poor scores...

IF he beats AA it would be a very good run for him but he is not near the P4P top 20 let alone 10...he is not the best SMW in the world let alone asnything else..

He is an exciting fighter who will go at it and you can never say Froch tried to earn an easy payday...He also gives you your Moneys worth even if he is on the losing side I can say that for him and that nis more then a lot of the top 10 P4P ranked guys

His poor defense will catch up to him eventually where he takes too much abuse plus he is not the quickest fighter in the world

I would argue that Pascal was at his best in that fight, such as it was then, and that as a result of the Froch fight he became the fighter he is today.

Maybe I worded it wrong....At his best I more or less meant that he was not the best version of Pascal....Pascal is much much better today....

Absolutely, but I think that's due to the Froch fight. I'd love to see a rematch.

I agree it more then likely pushed Pascal to make adjustments and work harder...If you look at his resume his comp is better since the loss then it was prior to....A rematch would be a good bout indeed....I am in no way a Froch fan just due to the fact he is an annoying cuss on TV and in person but he will give you the worth of admission and he keeps things interesting because he does have darn good stamina...He looks more beatable then what he is but what makes for a good fighter to watch does not make for a fighters skillset....Froch is a fighter that can beat anyone on any given night but more then not he will fall short against the A comp