Quote Originally Posted by Fenster View Post
Quote Originally Posted by Beanflicker View Post
Totally Disagree with Lennox as HW of the Decade, especially considering he fought only 3 of those years and they were by all accounts years past his prime.

Look at his record: Michael Grant, snoozer agaisnt David Tua, Frans Botha, KO LOSS to Rahman, a 12-years-past-his-prime Mike Tyson and the Vitali fight.

Give it to one of the Klitschkos, who were in their primes during this decade and ruled for much longer.

No disrespect to Lennox, who is one of the greatest HWs to ever grace the ring, but the 2000's weren't his decade.
Who has a better record than that?

Wlad's resume is crap.
Wlad beat up both Botha and Rahman, Tyson was shot, and Tua nor Grant ever won a title, plus he has wins over Byrd, Peter, Brock, Ibragimov, Chagaev, and Chambers

so who honestly did more from 2000 onward?