Ring Magazine fighters of the decade..

[skel1983]

Totally Disagree with Lennox as HW of the Decade, especially considering he fought only 3 of those years and they were by all accounts years past his prime.

Look at his record: Michael Grant, snoozer agaisnt David Tua, Frans Botha, KO LOSS to Rahman, a 12-years-past-his-prime Mike Tyson and the Vitali fight.

Give it to one of the Klitschkos, who were in their primes during this decade and ruled for much longer.

No disrespect to Lennox, who is one of the greatest HWs to ever grace the ring, but the 2000's weren't his decade.

Who has a better record than that?

Wlad's resume is crap.

Wlad beat up both Botha and Rahman, Tyson was shot, and Tua nor Grant ever won a title, plus he has wins over Byrd, Peter, Brock, Ibragimov, Chagaev, and Chambers

so who honestly did more from 2000 onward?

Was there any point in naming that lot? Even a "shot" Tyson pisses all over them.

You forgot to mention Lewis beat Vitali.

So that's a prime Rahman, compared to the old sumo Wlad beat, Botha, who Lewis beat far more impressively, an unbeaten prime Grant, a prime still deadly Tua, a Tyson that hadn't lost for five years and a prime hungry Vitali.

Now, alongside Wlad's bunch of D-level wins, he was also destroyed by Corrie 'golfer' Sanders and humiliated against Lamon Brewster.

Quality over quantity. Lewis wins easy. Fact.

Lewis by a country mile and some more.