erm... you said he said he got whooped not whopped and he said he got whopped so i said he didnt say it and he didnt say it and you said he did and he didnt therefore i am right and you are wrong
just a note, i wouldnt listen to fenster, he is very biast about a few fighters
I have to rewatch this at some point. I had Froch winning by a round iirc. Like HTH i watched on Primetime on a crystal clear picture, only to be told by a bunch of stream watching wankers that Kessler actually won and it wasn't even close. Pah.
I think Dirrell beat Froch anyway, so it's not like it changes anything. And i daredn't watch that fight again. Not even for money.
http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/
On a stream it seemed Mikkel Kessler won by a wider margin, but i did admit when i rewatched it in good quality. It was a bit closer than i remember, i had it 115-113 for Mikkel Kessler.
But there was still no doubt who the winner was for me. And even if you did have Carl Froch winning, which a majority didn't. It was still no robbery which HTH claimed, which is excuse my french fucking ridiculous.
Last edited by ICB; 09-22-2010 at 02:21 PM.
http://instagram.com/jonnyboy_85_/
exactly mate
primetime were calling it right down the middle, if however you watch showtimes version they would have you believe kessler had pretty much won every single round (theyre always up to that sort of shit)
I dont watch a fight once and throw out an opinion, i wait until ive seen it both drunk, sober, with commentary without commentary, and completely on the fence.
Froch got an absolute mugging when he fought kessler, anyone can see that
one dangerous horrible bloke
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks