Froch v Kessler - challenge

[ICB]

also dude froch wasnt staggered, that one punch kes landed in round 8 was his best of the fight and froch was slightly off ballance

you are either watching the fight through froch hating glasses or you cant admit you are wrong

Carl Froch dipped down when he got hit by that punch, he was hurt and he for certain felt the weight of that punch. Again you made this thread saying "challenge". Well i challenged your scoring in the 8th round, i gave very good examples of why i felt Mikkel Kessler won the round.

You haven't been able to argue back, why you felt Carl Froch won the round. Because you can't, Carl Froch landed nothing that in that round. And all he did was back up throwing slow jabs that were missing.

Infact i don't think either man really landed anything in the 1st half of the round, but in the 2nd half of the round. Mikkel Kessler landed the big right hand which made Carl Froch dip. He backed up Carl Froch towards the ropes, he also landed another right hand near the end of the round, which clearly gave Mikkel Kessler the round.

Lastly how am i wrong ? the official judges had Mikkel Kessler winning a UD. The majority of the boxing fans would agree with me that Mikkel Kessler won, so what am i wrong about ? you and HTH are the only ones that have the ridiculous scores. Which speaks volumes really.

[erics44]

also dude froch wasnt staggered, that one punch kes landed in round 8 was his best of the fight and froch was slightly off ballance

you are either watching the fight through froch hating glasses or you cant admit you are wrong

Carl Froch dipped down when he got hit by that punch, he was hurt and he for certain felt the weight of that punch. Again you made this thread saying "challenge". Well i challenged your scoring in the 8th round, i gave very good examples of why i felt Mikkel Kessler won the round.

You haven't been able to argue back, why you felt Carl Froch won the round. Because you can't, Carl Froch landed nothing that in that round. And all he did was back up throwing slow jabs that were missing.

Infact i don't think either man really landed anything in the 1st half of the round, but in the 2nd half of the round. Mikkel Kessler landed the big right hand which made Carl Froch dip. He backed up Carl Froch towards the ropes, he also landed another right hand near the end of the round, which clearly gave Mikkel Kessler the round.

Lastly how am i wrong ? the official judges had Mikkel Kessler winning a UD. The majority of the boxing fans would agree with me that Mikkel Kessler won, so what am i wrong about ? you and HTH are the only ones that have the ridiculous scores. Which speaks volumes really.

i have argued back, kessler landed 1 punch in that round froch landed many, admittedly it was one of kesslers better rounds but he didnt win it

like i said before, you dont win a round on 1 punch

and kessler had froch on the ropes in the fight on a few occasions including the 8th, i can tell you now on all thjose occasions combined kessler didnt land a punch of any meaning

i dont think the majority of boxing fans would have froch winning the fight if they watched it without the commentary and were completely non biast

i can almost understand people making a case for saying froch lost to dirrell because dirrel landed maybe even as many punches, even tho they were all on the run, in the kessler fight froch out landed him several to little

froch won of that there is no doubt

[ICB]

also dude froch wasnt staggered, that one punch kes landed in round 8 was his best of the fight and froch was slightly off ballance

you are either watching the fight through froch hating glasses or you cant admit you are wrong

Carl Froch dipped down when he got hit by that punch, he was hurt and he for certain felt the weight of that punch. Again you made this thread saying "challenge". Well i challenged your scoring in the 8th round, i gave very good examples of why i felt Mikkel Kessler won the round.

You haven't been able to argue back, why you felt Carl Froch won the round. Because you can't, Carl Froch landed nothing that in that round. And all he did was back up throwing slow jabs that were missing.

Infact i don't think either man really landed anything in the 1st half of the round, but in the 2nd half of the round. Mikkel Kessler landed the big right hand which made Carl Froch dip. He backed up Carl Froch towards the ropes, he also landed another right hand near the end of the round, which clearly gave Mikkel Kessler the round.

Lastly how am i wrong ? the official judges had Mikkel Kessler winning a UD. The majority of the boxing fans would agree with me that Mikkel Kessler won, so what am i wrong about ? you and HTH are the only ones that have the ridiculous scores. Which speaks volumes really.

i have argued back, kessler landed 1 punch in that round froch landed many, admittedly it was one of kesslers better rounds but he didnt win it

like i said before, you dont win a round on 1 punch

and kessler had froch on the ropes in the fight on a few occasions including the 8th, i can tell you now on all thjose occasions combined kessler didnt land a punch of any meaning

i dont think the majority of boxing fans would have froch winning the fight if they watched it without the commentary and were completely non biast

i can almost understand people making a case for saying froch lost to dirrell because dirrel landed maybe even as many punches, even tho they were all on the run, in the kessler fight froch out landed him several to little

froch won of that there is no doubt

Again what punches did Carl Froch land ? examples ? Carl Froch was backing up throwing slow jabs. Mikkel Kessler was the aggressor, landed the best punch in an uneventful round.

Its like im talking to a brick wall here, you can't be serious. I mean honestly tell me this is wind up, and your just trying to get a rise out of people ? how many people watch fights without sound ?

The way your making it sound, its like this is the worst robbery of the last decade. It would make no difference if you watched it on the moon, under water, on the tv, on the computer, with sound, without sound.

Carl Froch lost get over it, the reason a majority of boxing fans. And some of them know alot more about the sport than you do. And have watched 100's more fights, had Mikkel Kessler winning is because he did win legitmately.

As i've told you and your mate HTH, 100's of times. Yet you both bring up the same pitiful argument. Mikkel Kessler was coming forward, he landed the better punches, he had the better workrate, he closed out the fight in style in the last round.

How hard is that too understand ? i don't care how many times you watch it, while you and your mate HTH are fantasizing over Carl Froch. And giving random rounds to Carl Froch he clearly lost.

It won't make no difference, Carl Froch lost legitmately end of.

[skel1983]

Kessler won a close but clear decision for me, but the sad thing is he was there for the taking and Froch for me was a little under par in that fight.

[erics44]

Kessler won a close but clear decision for me, but the sad thing is he was there for the taking and Froch for me was a little under par in that fight.

which rounds did he win?

[erics44]

also dude froch wasnt staggered, that one punch kes landed in round 8 was his best of the fight and froch was slightly off ballance

you are either watching the fight through froch hating glasses or you cant admit you are wrong

Carl Froch dipped down when he got hit by that punch, he was hurt and he for certain felt the weight of that punch. Again you made this thread saying "challenge". Well i challenged your scoring in the 8th round, i gave very good examples of why i felt Mikkel Kessler won the round.

You haven't been able to argue back, why you felt Carl Froch won the round. Because you can't, Carl Froch landed nothing that in that round. And all he did was back up throwing slow jabs that were missing.

Infact i don't think either man really landed anything in the 1st half of the round, but in the 2nd half of the round. Mikkel Kessler landed the big right hand which made Carl Froch dip. He backed up Carl Froch towards the ropes, he also landed another right hand near the end of the round, which clearly gave Mikkel Kessler the round.

Lastly how am i wrong ? the official judges had Mikkel Kessler winning a UD. The majority of the boxing fans would agree with me that Mikkel Kessler won, so what am i wrong about ? you and HTH are the only ones that have the ridiculous scores. Which speaks volumes really.

i have argued back, kessler landed 1 punch in that round froch landed many, admittedly it was one of kesslers better rounds but he didnt win it

like i said before, you dont win a round on 1 punch

and kessler had froch on the ropes in the fight on a few occasions including the 8th, i can tell you now on all thjose occasions combined kessler didnt land a punch of any meaning

i dont think the majority of boxing fans would have froch winning the fight if they watched it without the commentary and were completely non biast

i can almost understand people making a case for saying froch lost to dirrell because dirrel landed maybe even as many punches, even tho they were all on the run, in the kessler fight froch out landed him several to little

froch won of that there is no doubt

Again what punches did Carl Froch land ? examples ? Carl Froch was backing up throwing slow jabs. Mikkel Kessler was the aggressor, landed the best punch in an uneventful round.

Its like im talking to a brick wall here, you can't be serious. I mean honestly tell me this is wind up, and your just trying to get a rise out of people ? how many people watch fights without sound ?

The way your making it sound, its like this is the worst robbery of the last decade. It would make no difference if you watched it on the moon, under water, on the tv, on the computer, with sound, without sound.

Carl Froch lost get over it, the reason a majority of boxing fans. And some of them know alot more about the sport than you do. And have watched 100's more fights, had Mikkel Kessler winning is because he did win legitmately.

As i've told you and your mate HTH, 100's of times. Yet you both bring up the same pitiful argument. Mikkel Kessler was coming forward, he landed the better punches, he had the better workrate, he closed out the fight in style in the last round.

How hard is that too understand ? i don't care how many times you watch it, while you and your mate HTH are fantasizing over Carl Froch. And giving random rounds to Carl Froch he clearly lost.

It won't make no difference, Carl Froch lost legitmately end of.

watch the 5th and the 11th, is easy for froch in the 5th and the 11th kessler is almost out

the only thing you can give kessler is perhaps he came forward a little more

kessler wasnt competative for most of the fight

end of what?

[HattonTheHammer]

erics44 has only been here a short time and he is already proving he knows more about boxing than most of the veterans on here claim too

ice - you saw a different fight to everyone else, im convinced your talking about the undercard fight as nothing you currently say makes any sense

[skel1983]

Eric I will have to watch the fight again I will get back to you

[HattonTheHammer]

Eric I will have to watch the fight again I will get back to you

turn off the damn showtime commentary this time around eh mate

[erics44]

Eric I will have to watch the fight again I will get back to you

good stuff

like HTH says tho its better with no commentry

[Fenster]

Just watched froch v kessler again and i had it 117-113 to froch

biast i hear you shouting, i dont think so

i challenge to to watch it again, turn the sound down, try and forget how you feel about the fighters and score it as honest as posible

mate asking these lot to score a carl froch fight without any biased is like asking gary glitter to babysit for you

PS:117-113?? you should never score a round 10-10 mate, makes the whole process inadequate

i think i scored 2 rounds 10-10 and that was coz a couple were close and i hadnt given kessler anything

if im not allowed to score them 10 10 then i my card would be 117-111

p.s how did you score round 11 to kes? that and 5 kes looked in trouble

If someone saw the fight the same as you except they found Kessler the winner of your two 10-10 rounds what would their score be?

[HattonTheHammer]

Just watched froch v kessler again and i had it 117-113 to froch

biast i hear you shouting, i dont think so

i challenge to to watch it again, turn the sound down, try and forget how you feel about the fighters and score it as honest as posible

mate asking these lot to score a carl froch fight without any biased is like asking gary glitter to babysit for you

PS:117-113?? you should never score a round 10-10 mate, makes the whole process inadequate

i think i scored 2 rounds 10-10 and that was coz a couple were close and i hadnt given kessler anything

if im not allowed to score them 10 10 then i my card would be 117-111

p.s how did you score round 11 to kes? that and 5 kes looked in trouble

If someone saw the fight the same as you except they found Kessler the winner of your two 10-10 rounds what would their score be?

115-113 - still for froch

[CFH]

I think I had it 115-113 Froch. It' s been a long time since I saw the fight though.

Maybe we can do this one in the 'Controversial Fights' thread next week if there's enough demand.

[armin]

I really don't get where the fuss for this fight is coming from, to have froch winning 117-111, is as bad as one judge having the martinez williams fight 119-111 for williams. It was a fairly close fight in which the right man won, sorry froch just didn't seem to want it as badly tho I don't think. Backing up for most of the fight isn't going to win you the fight if you're not outlanding the dude and making him miss, which froch didn't do. Erics 44 you say kess' best day are behind him and you're right, his 1-2 doesn't look nowhere near as crisp as it used to be, but then if his days are behind him what's that say about froch?

[Therebelsin]

Likekessler. Better. Hate. Froch